Skip to main content

The syntax of pictorial instructions

  • Chapter
Processing of Visible Language

Part of the book series: Nato Conference Series ((HF,volume 13))

Abstract

Describing an action and co-ordinating representational and non-representational elements to express an idea are two of the most important tasks facing the designer of pictorial instructions. Previous attempts to describe a syntax for the organization of graphic materials are discussed. An experiment in which subjects drew their own pictorial instructions showed how people represent actions pictorially, the syntactic categories of elements with which they operate, and the variety ofsyntactic forms which can be used to express a pictorial instruction. Care must be taken, however, in generalizing conclusions from the production exercise to the design of easily comprehensible instructions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References Notes

  1. Adler, M. Understanding Peanuts cartoons. In J. A. M. Howe & B. Meltzer (Eds.), Progress in perception (Research Report No. 13). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Department of Artificial Intelligence, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Karsh, R., & Mudd, S. A Design of a picture language to identify vehicle controls: III. A comparative evaluation of selected picture-symbol designs. (Technical Memorandum 15–62, AD No. 289544). Aberdeen, Md.: U.S. Army Human Engineering Laboratories, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Mudd, S. A., & Karsh, R. Design of a picture language to identify vehicle controls. I. General method and II. Investigation of population stereotypes. (Technical Memorandum No. 22–61, AD No. 272263). Aberdeen, Md.: U.S. Army Human Engineering Laboratory, 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Rankin, B. K., III, Sillars, W. A., & Hsu, R. W. On the pictorial structure of the Chinese character (Technical Note 254). Washington, D.C.: National Bureau of Standards, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Rutley, K. S., & Christie, A. W. A comparison of the varieties of traffic signalfilter arrow (RRL Report No. 33). Crowthorne: Ministry of Transport, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Szlichcinski, K.P. The language of pictorial instructions: A production experiment. Martlesham: British Post Office Research Department Report, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Szlichcinski, K.P. Understanding pictorial instructions: Five experiments. Martlesham: British Post Office Research Department Report, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Watt, W. C. Morphology of the Nevada cattlebrands and their blazons, Part One (Report No. 9050). Washington, D.C.: National Bureau of Standards, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

References

  • Barnard, P., & Marcel, T. Representation and understanding in the use of symbols and pictograms. In R. Easterby H. Zwaga (Eds.), The visual presentation of information. Chichester: Wiley, in press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brainard, R. W., Campbell, R. J., & Elkin, E. H. Design and interpretability of road signs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1961,45, 130–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, A. A first language. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clowes, M. B. Scene analysis and picture grammars. In F. Nake & A. Rosenfeld (Eds.), Graphic languages. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coppen, H. Visual perception: a review of the literature relating to studies relevant to the development of teaching materials in the Commonwealth. London: Commonwealth Secretariat, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, R. L. The intelligent eye. London: Weidenfeld & Nicholson, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harmon, L. D., & Julesz, B. Masking in visual recognition: effects of two- dimensional filtered noise. Science, 1973, 180, 1194–1197.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes-Roth, F. Learning by example. In A. M. Lesgold, J. W. Pellegrino, F. D. Fokkema, & R. M. Glaser (Eds.), Cognitive psychology and instruction. New York: Plenum Press, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howell, W. C., & Fuchs, A. H. Population stereotypy in code design. Organizational Behaviour and Human Performance, 1968,5,310–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ivins, W. M. Prints and visual communication, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1953.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolers, P. A. Some formal characteristics of pictograms. American Scientist, 1969, 57,348–363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krampen, M. The production method in sign design research. Print, 1969,23, 59–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Longuet-Higgins, H. C., & Steedman, M.J. On interpreting Bach. In B. Meltzer & D. Michie (Eds.), Machine intelligence 6, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcel, T., & Barnard, P. Paragraphs of pictographs: the use of non-verbal instructions for equipment. In P. A. Kolers, M. E. Wrolstad,& H. Bouma (Eds.), Processing of visible language 1, New York and London: Plenum Press, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G. A. English verbs of motion: A case study in semantics and lexical memory. In A. W. Melton & E. Martin (Eds.), Coding processes in human memory. Washington: Winston, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G. A., & Johnson-Laird, Language and perception. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagao, M. Picture recognition and data structure. In F. Nake & A. Rosenfeld (Eds.), Graphic languages. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rankin, B. K., III. A linguistic study of the formation of Chinese characters. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Pennsylvania, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichenbach, H. Elements of symbolic logic. In D. Davidson & G. Harman (Eds.), The logic of grammar. Encino, Cal.: Dickenson, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A., & Hayes, J. R. Understanding complex task instructions. In D. Klahr (Ed.), Cognition and instruction. Potomac: Erlbaum, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szlichcinski, K. P. The art of describing sounds. Applied Ergonomics, 1979,10, 131–138. (a)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Szlichcinski, K. P. Diagrams and illustrations as aids to problem solving. Instructional Science, 1919, 8, 253–274. (b)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szlichcinski, K. P. Factors affecting the comprehension of pictographic instructions. In R. Easterby & H. Zwaga (Eds.), The visual presentation of information. Chichester: Wiley, in press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tweney, R. D., Heiman, G. W., & Hoemann, H. W. Psychological processing of sign language: effects of visual disruption on sign intelligibility. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1977,106, 255–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1980 Plenum Press, New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Szlichcinski, K.P. (1980). The syntax of pictorial instructions. In: Kolers, P.A., Wrolstad, M.E., Bouma, H. (eds) Processing of Visible Language. Nato Conference Series, vol 13. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-1068-6_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-1068-6_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4684-1070-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4684-1068-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics