Skip to main content

Detection of Ni-Cu Ultramafic Deposits of the North American Shield by Optimized Geophysical Surveys and Drilling Programs

  • Chapter
Designing Optimal Strategies for Mineral Exploration

Abstract

According to Ross and Travis,(18) there are three main tectonic settings for the sulfide nickel deposits of the World: (1) stable platforms, chiefly of Proterozoic age, (2) remnants of island arcs and mobile belts, mainly of Archean age, referred to as “Greenstone Belts,” and (3) Paleozoic and Mesozoic fold belts. The first two types of setting are well represented in the North American Precambrian Shield; the third one is found along the North American Cordillera Belt. Ross and Travis(18) and Naldrett(16) recognize three genetic and lithologic groups of sulfide nickel deposits throughout the world. The first two are associated with layered complexes and undifferentiated intrusives, while the third one has mafic volcanic affiliations. All three are known to occur in North America.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References and Selected Readings

  1. CAMERON, E. M., SIDDELEY, G., and DURHAM, C. G., 1971, Distribution of ore elements in rocks for evaluating ore potential: Nickel, copper and sulfur in ultra-mafic rocks of the Canadian Shield, Can. Inst. Min. Metall. Spec. Vol. 11, 298–313.

    Google Scholar 

  2. CHAYER, T. P., 1960, Some critical differences between Alpine-type and stratiform peridotite-gabbro complexes, 21st International Geological Congress, Pt. XIII, pp. 247–259.

    Google Scholar 

  3. COAD, P. R., 1979, Nickel sulfide deposits associated with ultramafic rocks of the Abitibi Belt and economic potential of mafic-ultramafic intrusions, Ontario Geological Survey, Study No. 20, Toronto, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  4. CORNWALL, H. R., 1966, Nickel deposits of North America, U.S. Geol. Surv. Bull. No. 1223.

    Google Scholar 

  5. DOWSETT, J. S., 1979, Geophysical exploration methods for nickel, Geol. Surv. Can. Econ. Geol. Rep. No. 31, 310–321.

    Google Scholar 

  6. ECKSTRAND, O. R., 1972, Ultramafic flows and nickel sulfide deposits in the Abitibi Orogenic Belt, Geol. Surv. Can. Pap. 72.-1, part A, 75–81.

    Google Scholar 

  7. IRVINE, T. N., and SMITH, C. H., 1967, The ultrabasic rocks of the Muskox intrusion, N.W.T., Canada, in Ultramafic and Related Rocks, pp. 38–49, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  8. JACKSON, E. D., 1961, Primary textures and mineral associations in the ultramafic zone of the Stillwater complex, Montana, U.S. Geol. Surv. Prof. Pap. No. 358.

    Google Scholar 

  9. KILBURN, L. C., WILSON, H. D. B., GRAHAM, A. R., and OGURA, Y., 1969, Nickel sulfide ores related to ultrabasic intrusions in Canada, Symposium on magmatic ore deposits, Economic Geology Publishing Co, pp. 276–293.

    Google Scholar 

  10. LIEBENBERG, L., 1970, The sulfides in the layered sequence of the Bushveld igneous complex, Geological Society of South Africa, Special Publication No. 1, pp. 108–207.

    Google Scholar 

  11. LUSK, J., 1976, A possible volcanic-exhalative origin for lenticular nickel sulfide deposits of volcanic association, with special references to those of Western Australia; Can. J. Sci. 13, 451–458.

    Google Scholar 

  12. MACKENZIE, B. W., 1968, Nickel: Canada and the World, Mining Rept No. 16, Department of Energy, Mines and Resources, Ottawa.

    Google Scholar 

  13. MILLER, C. P., 1959, A comparison of plant and soil prospecting for nickel, A.I.M.E. Preprint No. 59-L-40.

    Google Scholar 

  14. NALDRETT, A. J., 1966, The role of sulfurization in the genesis of iron–nickel sulfide deposits of the Porcupine District, Can. Inst. Min. Metall. Bull. 59, 489–497.

    Google Scholar 

  15. NALDRETT, A. J., and GASPARRINI, E. L., 1971, Archean nickel sulfide deposits in Canada: Their classification, geological setting and genesis, with some suggestions as to exploration, Geol. Soc. Aust. Spec. Pub. No. 3, 201–226.

    Google Scholar 

  16. NALDRETT, A. J., 1973, Nickel sulfide deposits—Their classification and genesis with special emphasis on deposits of volcanogenic association, Can. Inst. Min. Metall. Bull. 66 (739), 45–63.

    Google Scholar 

  17. OBIAL, R., APELO, M., and SANTOS, G., 1972, Geochemical prospecting for nickel sulfides—An orientation survey, J. Geol. Soc. Philipp. 26, 1–36.

    Google Scholar 

  18. ROSS, J. R., and TRAVIS, G. A., 1981, Nickel sulfide deposits of Western Australia in global perspective, Econ. Geol. 76, 1291–1329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. SHLANKA, R., 1969, Copper, nickel, lead and zinc deposits of Ontario, Ontario Department of Mines, M.R.C. 12, Toronto.

    Google Scholar 

  20. TAYLOR, R. B., 1964, Geology of the Duluth gabbro complex near Duluth, Minnesota, Minn. Geol. Surv. Bull. No. 44.

    Google Scholar 

  21. WAGER, L. R., and BROWN, G. M., 1968, Layered Igneous Rocks, Oliver & Boyd, London.

    Google Scholar 

  22. WAGER, L. R., VINCENT, E. A., and SMALES, A. A., 1957, Sulfides in the Skaergaard intrusion, East Greenland, Econ. Geol. 52, 855–903.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. WALKER, F., 1940, Differentiation of the Palisades diabase, New Jersey, Bull. Geol. Soc. Am. 51, 1059–1106.

    Google Scholar 

  24. WILSON, H. D. B., and BRISBIN, W. C., 1961, Regional structure of the Thompson–Moak Lake Nickel Belt, Can. Inst. Min. Metall. Bull. 54 (596), 815–821.

    Google Scholar 

  25. WYLIE, P. J. (Ed.) 1967, A Review of the Geology of the Ultra-mafic and Related Rocks, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  26. ZURBRIGG, H. F., 1963, Thompson mine geology, Can. Inst. Min. Metall. Bull. 56, 451–460.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1985 Plenum Press, New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

De Geoffroy, J.G., Wignall, T.K. (1985). Detection of Ni-Cu Ultramafic Deposits of the North American Shield by Optimized Geophysical Surveys and Drilling Programs. In: Designing Optimal Strategies for Mineral Exploration. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-1230-7_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-1230-7_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4684-1232-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4684-1230-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics