Skip to main content

Deindividuation: Loss of Uniqueness

  • Chapter
Uniqueness

Part of the book series: Perspectives in Social Psychology ((PSPS))

Abstract

This final section is aimed at drawing conclusions about the role of uniqueness motivation in our society. The present chapter examines how people may lose their sense of uniqueness in our “mass” societal contexts, which tend to deindividuate people. In this vein, it is important to note that existential philosophers, psychologists, political scientists, and sociologists alike have often portrayed the loss of uniqueness and individualism as one of the central problems in American society. As expressed by Gross and Osterman (1971):

Much of the contemporary American social and political thought can be seen as a continuing debate over problems and prospects of individualism in our national life… so basic is the concept of individualism to American society that every major issue which faces us as a nation invariably poses itself in these terms. (p. xi)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Alvarez, R. Informal reactions to deviance in simulated work organizations: A laboratory experiment. American Sociological Review, 1968, 33, 895–912.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Argyle, M. (Ed.). Social interaction. London: Methuen, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barker, R. G., & Gump, P. V. Big school, small school: High school size and student behavior. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron, R. S. Anonymity, deindividuation and aggression. Paper presented at the Western Psychological Association, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Booker, G. S. Behavioral aspects of disciplinary action. Personnel Psychology, 1969, 15, 525–529.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R. Social psychology. New York: Free Press, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J. P., Dunnette, M. D., Lawler, E. E., III., & Weick, K. E. Managerial behavior performance, and effectiveness. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cannavale, F. J., Scarr, H. A., & Pepitone, A. Deindividuation in the small group: Further evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1970, 16, 141–147.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Couch, C.J. Dimensions of association in collective behavior episodes. Sociometry, 1970, 33, 457–471.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, D. B. The fear of conspiracy: Images of un-American subversion from the revolution to the present. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E., Westford, K. L., Diener, C., & Beaman, A. L. Deindividuating effects of group presence and arousal on stealing by halloween trick-or-treaters. Proceedings of the 81st Annual Convention of the American Psychol-ogical Association, 1973, 8, 219–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E., Westford, K. L., Dineen, J., & Fraser, S. Beat the pacifist: The deindividuating effects of anomymity and group presence. Proceedings of the 81st Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, 1973, 8, 221–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dion, K. L., Baron, R. S., & Miller, N. Why do groups make riskier decisions than individuals? In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, vol. 5. New York: Academic, 1970, pp. 305–377.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dipboye, R. L. Unrestrained behavior, identity seeking, and overcontrolled behaviors as responses to deindividuating environments. Unpublished manuscript. Purdue University, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duval, S., & Wicklund, R. A. A theory of objective self awareness. New York: Academic, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Festinger, L., Pepitone, A., & Newcomb, T. Some consequences of deindividuation in a group. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1952, 47, 382–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiedler, F. E. A theory of leadership effectiveness. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galbraith, J., & Cummings, L. L. An empirical investigation of the motivational determinants of task performance: Interactive effects between instrumentality valence and motivation-ability. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1967, 2, 237–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Georgopolous, B. S., Mahoney, G. M., & Jones, N. W. A path-goal approach to productivity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1957, 41, 345–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghiselli, E. E. Individuality as a factor in the success of management personnel. Personnel Psychology, 1960, 13, 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. On face-work: An analysis of ritual elements in social interactions. Psychiatry, 1955, 18, 213–231.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. Asylums. Garden City, N. Y.: Doubleday Anchor, 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graen, G. Instrumentality theory of work motivation: Some experimental results and suggested modifications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1969, 53 (Whole No. 2, part 2), 1–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gross, E., & Stone, G. P. Embarrassment and the analysis of role requirements. American Journal of Sociology, 1964, 70, 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gross, R., & Osleman, P. Individualism: Man in modern society. New York: Dell, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Indik, B. P. Organization size and member participation: Some empirical tests of alternative explanations. Human Relations, 1965, 18, 339–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James, W. The principles of psychology, vol. 1. New York: Holt & Co., 1890.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Katz, D., & Kahn, R. L. The social psychology of organizations. New York: Wiley, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keniston, K. Young radicals: Notes on committed youth. New York: Harcourt, Brace, & World, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawler, E. E. III. Pay and organizational effectiveness: A psychological view. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulder, F. Characteristics of violators of formal company rules. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1971, 55, 500–502.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Patchen, M. The choice of wage comparisons. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pincus, F. L. Risky and conservative group shifts: Conformity, leadership, or responsibility diffusion. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reich, C. A. The greening of America. New York: Random House, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schein, E. H. Organizational socialization and the profession of management. Industrial Management Review, 1968, 9, 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schein, E. H. The individual, the organization, and the career: A conceptual scheme. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 1971, 7, 401–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W. E. Activation theory and task design. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1966, 1, 3–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, D. M. Size of share in task motivation and work group. Sociometry, 1960, 23, 203–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singer, J. E., Brush, C. A., & Lublin, S. C. Some aspects of deindividuation: Identification and conformity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1965, 1, 356–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinha, J. B. P., & Wherry, R. J., Jr. Determinants of norm violating behavior in a simulated industrial setting. Personnel Psychology, 1965, 18, 403–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, C. R. Comparisons. Milbrae, Calif.: Celestial Arts, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suran, B. Oddballs: The social maverick and the dynamics of individuality. Chicago: Nelson-Hall, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teger, A. I., & Pruitt, D. G. Components of group risk taking. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1967, 3, 189–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tyran, K. Orson Welles. Playboy, 1967, 14, 53–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vonnegut, K. Harrison Bergeron. In K. Vonnegut, Welcome to the monkey house. New York: Dell, 1971, pp. 7–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, C. R., & Guest, R. H. The man on the assembly line. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1952.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warner, W. K., & Hilander, J. S. The relationship between size of organization and membership participation. Rural Sociology, 1964, 29, 30–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, R. I., Jr. Investigation into deindividuation using a cross-cultural survey technique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1973, 25, 342–345.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • White, R. K., & Lippitt, R. Autocracy and democracy: An experimental inquiry. New York: Harper & Row, 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whyte, W. H. The organization man. New York: Simon & Schuster, 1956.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilken, P. H. Size of organization and member participation in church congregations. Administrative Sciences Quarterly, 1971, 16, 173–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zabrack, M., & Miller, N. Group aggression: The effects of friendship ties and anonymity. Proceedings of the 80th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, 1972, 7, 211–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziller, R. C. Individuation and socialization: A theory of assimilation in large organizations. Human Relations, 1964, 17, 341–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimbardo, P. G. The human choice: Individuation, reason, and order vs. deindividuation, impulse, and chaos. In W. Arnold & D. Levine (Eds.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, vol. xvii. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1969, pp. 237–307.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1980 Plenum Press, New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Snyder, C.R., Fromkin, H.L. (1980). Deindividuation: Loss of Uniqueness. In: Uniqueness. Perspectives in Social Psychology. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-3659-4_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-3659-4_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4684-3661-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4684-3659-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics