Skip to main content

Women in Positions of Authority

A Case Study of Changing Sex Roles

  • Chapter
The Gender Gap in Psychotherapy
  • 371 Accesses

Abstract

This paper aims to contribute to the study of women in positions of authority. By examining the dynamics of patriarchal relations, sex roles, and sex-role behavior among the staff of an American university in a stressed situation, it attempts to go beyond traditional sociological explanations of the way men and women behave in small groups.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Jo Freeman, “The Tyranny of Structurelessness,” Berkeley Journal of Sociology 17 (197273): 151–64.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Robert F. Bales, Interaction Process Analysis (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1951); Talcott Parsons et al., Family, Socialization, and Interaction Process (Glencoe, Ill.: Free Press, 1955). See the extensive bibliography on small-group research in R. E. L. Faris, ed., The Handbook of Modern Sociology ( Chicago: Rand McNally & Co., 1964 ), pp. 257–64.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Philip Slater, Microcosm (New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1966); and Peter Berger and Thomas Luckmann, The Social Construction of Reality ( New York: Doubleday & Co., 1966 ).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Tavistock theory is based on the work of W. R. Bion, Experiences in Groups (New York: Basic Books, 1959 ) and A. K. Rice, Learning for Leadership ( London: Tavistock Publications, 1965 ).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Max Horkheimer, “Authority and the Family,” Critical Theory: Selected Essays ( New York: Herder & Herder, 1972 ), pp. 47–129.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Norman O. Brown, Love’s Body (New York: Random House, 1966).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Douglas T. Hall, “A Model of Coping with Role Conflict: The Role Behavior of College Educated Women,” Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 17 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  8. R.D. Mann, Interpersonal Styles and Group Development ( New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1967 ).

    Google Scholar 

  9. A. Leffler, D. L. Gillespie, and E. Lerner Ratner, “Academic Feminists and the Women’s Movement,” Insurgent Sociologist$14, no. 1 (Fall 1973 ): 45–56.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1979 University of Chicago

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mayes, S.S. (1979). Women in Positions of Authority. In: Rieker, P.P., Carmen, E. (eds) The Gender Gap in Psychotherapy. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-4754-5_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-4754-5_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4684-4756-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4684-4754-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics