Abstract
The world is in a moral crisis today, everyone agrees. It is little comfort that many people would have agreed with the preceding statement at just about any time in history. The older generation has worried about the decline in the moral fiber of the young at least since the time of the Greek philosophers, and we still have not quite succumbed. Such a general reassurance can hardly substitute for data, but it would be difficult indeed to conduct an empirical survey of the present moral state of the world, quite aside from the fact that comparable data from earlier times would be even more nearly impossible to obtain. In our huge and pluralistic world, there are many evidences of increased respect for life and for individual liberty, more social justice, and other moral desirables. It is very difficult to balance such trends against the many signs that monetary values override all others in many contexts, that unjustifiable exploitation and privilege are firmly entrenched, and that various types of crime are on the rise.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
J. Schell, The Fate of the Earth, (New York: Avon, 1982).
Sigmund Freud, The Future of an Illusion, (1927) Standard Edition, Vol. 21 (London: Hogarth, 1964).
Roy Schäfer, A New Language for Psychoanalysis (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1976).
R. R. Holt, “The Past and Future of Ego Psychology,” Psychoanalytic Quarterly 44(1975):550–76.
Paul Roazen, Freud and His Followers (New York: Knopf, 1975), pp. 145ff.
E. L. Freud and H. Meng, eds., Psychoanalysis and Faith: Dialogues with the Reverend Oskar Pfister, trans. E. Mosbacher (London: Hogarth Press, 1963), pp. 61–62.
They are, of course, often seriously mistaken in believing that they are looking out for themselves; let me only remind you of Hardin’s “Tragedy of the Commons.” (Cf. G. Hardin, “The Tragedy of the Commons,” Science 162[1968]: 1243–48.)
F. J. Sulloway, Freud, Biologist of the Mind (New York: Basic Books, 1979).
Three Essays on Sexuality (1905), Standard Edition, 7:177.
The Ego and the Id (1923), Standard Edition, 19.
The Future of an Illusion (1927), Standard Edition, 21:53.
Moses and Monotheism (1939), Standard Edition, 23:100.
Cf. R. R. Holt, “On Freedom, Autonomy, and the Redirection of Psychoanalytic Theory: A Rejoinder,” International Journal of Psychiatry 3(1967):524–36; and “Freud’s Mechanistic and Humanistic Image of Man,” in Psychoanalysis and Contemporary Science, Vol. 1, ed. R. R. Holt and E. Peterfreund (New York: Macmillan, 1972), 3–24.
Paul Weiss, “The Living System: Determination Stratified,” in Beyond Reductionism, ed. A. Koestler and J. Smithies (New York: Macmillan, 1969).
“Some Additional Notes on Dream-Interpretation as a Whole” (1925), Standard Edition, 19:133.
Ibid., p. 134.
I want to take at least brief notice of the fact that a case can be made for the proposition that the influence of organized religion has retardec the moral development of humankind.
Philip Rieff, Freud: The Mind of the Moralist (New York: Viking, 1959).
Cf. J. M. Baldwin, Social and Ethical Interpretations in Mental Development (New York: Macmillan, 1897);
L. T. Hobhouse, Morals in Evolution (New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1906);
Edward Westermarck, The Origin and Development of the Moral Ideas, 2 vols. (London: Macmillan, 1906–1908);
William McDougall, An Introduction to Social Psychology (London: Me-thuen, 1908);
and J. Dewey and J. Tufts, Ethics (New York: Holt, 1908).
Cf. Jean Piaget, The Moral Judgment of the Child (New York: Free Press, 1932);
L. Kohlberg, “Stage and Sequence: The Cognitive-Developmental Approach to Socialization,” in Essays on Moral Development (New York: Harper & Row, 1981).
H. Hartmann, Essays on Ego Psychology (New York: International Universities Press, 1964).
It is quite possible that much of the complaint about modern immorality comes from conventional persons alarmed by these signs of moral development.
Douglas Heath, Maturity and Competence (New York: Gardner, 1977);
Andras Angyal, Foundations for a Science of Personality (New York: Commonwealth Fund, 1941).
D. Bakan, The Duality of Human Existence (Chicago: Rand McNally, 1966).
Beyond the Pleasure Principle (1920), Standard Edition, 18.
The Ego and the Id, Standard Edition, 19:56, 59.
Group Psychology and the Analysis of the Ego, Standard Edition, 18.
Paul Roazen, Freud: Political and Social Thought (New York: Knopf, 1968).
M. Walzer, “Nervous Liberals” (Review of The Neoconservatives by Peter Steinfels) New York Review of Books 26(15):(1979), p. 6.
C. Lasch, The Culture of Narcissism (New York: Norton, 1979).
Psychoanalysis and Religion (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1950); You Shall Be as Gods (New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1966).
J. Loevinger, Ego Development: Conceptions and Theories (San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1976).
R. R. Holt, “Loevinger’s Measure of Ego Development: Reliability and National Norms for Short Male and Female Forms,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1980,39,909–920.
H. A. Murray, “Beyond Yesterday’s Idealisms” in Endeavors in Psychology: Selections from the Personology of Henry A. Murray, ed. E. S. Shneidman (New York: Harper & Row, 1981).
According to Carol Gilligan, In Another Voice (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1982), women generally think about moral issues contex-tually and in terms of care and responsibility, while men tend to stress abstract justice. If her data can be generalized, the needed changes described above could be attained without the widespread structural growth that seems so hard to achieve, by society’s giving the alternative moral voice of community a more prominent role in the moral consensus. She stresses that it is by no means exclusive to women. (Note added in proof.)
S. C. Pepper, World Hypotheses: A Study in Evidence (Berkeley, Calif.: University of California Press, 1942).
**S. C. Pepper, World Hypotheses: A Study in Evidence (Berkeley, Calif.: University of California Press, 1942).**Ibid, p. 91.
The coherence of a world hypothesis is not that of a formal system and should not be taken to mean the rigid lucidity of deductive interconnectedness.
Totem and Taboo (1912–1913), Standard Edition, 13.
E. A. Burtt, The Metaphysical Foundations of Modern Physical Science, 2nd ed. (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1932).
A. N. Whitehead, Science in the Modern World, rev. ed. (New York: Mentor, 1952).
Like formism and contextualism, it never captured the popular imagination as animism and mechanism have done.
W. G. Perry, Forms of Intellectual and Ethical Development in the College Years (New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1970).
D. H. Munro, “Relativism in Ethics,” in Dictionary of the History of Ideas, ed. P. P. Wiener, vol. 4 (New York: Scribner’s, 1973).
P. P. Wiener, “Pragmatism,” in Dictionary of the History of Ideas, vol. 3.
D. R. Hofstadter, Gödel, Escher, Bach: An Eternal Golden Braid (New York: Basic Books, 1979).
Wiener, “Pragmatism,” p. 553.
Pepper, World Hypotheses, p. 234.
G. Holton, “Einstein’s Task as a Universe Builder: His Early Years,” Bulletin of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences 33:1(1979): 12–28.
E. Erikson, “Psychoanalytic Reflections on Einstein’s Centenary,” in Albert Einstein, Historical and Cultural Perspectives, eds. G. Holton and Y. Elkana (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1982).
It is instructive if saddening to notice how often transference is construed— even by psychoanalysts themselves—as meaning simply falling in love with your analyst. Here Freud’s own sexual reductionism joined forces with the regressive temptation to which thought is always vulnerable. That tendency itself, incidentally, is another manifestation of the same thought pattern as transference, which Piaget called “assimilation.”
More precisely, those of Lorenz and Minkowski.
E. A. Burtt, “The Status of ‘World Hypotheses,’“Philosophical Review 52(1943):590–601.
Later, he did attempt to state his own fifth world hypothesis. Pepper, Concept and Quality: A World Hypothesis (LaSalle, 111.: Open Court, 1967).
Quoted in L. E. Hahn, “The Stephen C. Pepper Papers, 1903–1972,” Paunch 53–54(1980):75.
S. E. Hyman, The Tangled Bank (New York: Atheneum, 1962).
The Life and Work of Sigmund Freud, vol. 3 (New York: Basic Books, 1957), 247.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1984 The Hastings Center
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Holt, R.R. (1984). Freud’s Impact on Modern Morality and Our World View. In: Caplan, A.L., Jennings, B. (eds) Darwin, Marx and Freud. The Hastings Center Series in Ethics. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-7850-1_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-7850-1_7
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4684-7852-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-4684-7850-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive