Skip to main content

Implementation of a Performance Measurement Framework in Greek Manufacture: An Empirical Research

  • Chapter
Managing in Uncertainty: Theory and Practice

Part of the book series: Applied Optimization ((APOP,volume 19))

  • 586 Accesses

Abstract

This paper presents an overview of an empirical research on performance measurement at Greek manufacturing industries. The main objective of the research was to investigate the extent to which an integrated, balanced performance measurement system is or can be implemented successfully in Greek industry. Based on the guidelines of the Nolan Norton Framework, the survey focused on four key areas of business activity: (a) customer satisfaction, (b) business processes, (c) organizational learning, and (d) financial performance. The responding companies evaluate and assess at a large extent the critical business factors, concerning the four areas mentioned above. However, some basic organizational changes are essential, so that the companies can implement successfully an integrated performance measurement system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Eccles, R.G. (1991), “The performance measurement manifesto”, Harvard Business Review, January-February, 117–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geanurakos, J. and Meiklejohn, I. (1993), Performance Measurement: The New Agenda, Business Intelligence.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, R.S. and Norton, D.P. (1992), “The balanced scorecard — Measures that drive performance”, Harvard Business Review, January-February, 71–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, R.S. and Norton, D.P. (1993), “Putting the balanced scorecard to work”, Harvard Business Review, September-October, 134–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, R.S. and Norton, D.P. (1996), “Using the balanced scorecard as a strategic management system”, Harvard Business Review, January-February, 75–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nolan Norton (1991), Executive Summary, Measuring Performance in the Organisation of the Future: A Research Study, Nolan Norton & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ploss, G. (1991), Managing in the New World of Manufacturing: How companies can improve operations to compete globally, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mandaraka, M., Legal, M. (1998). Implementation of a Performance Measurement Framework in Greek Manufacture: An Empirical Research. In: Zopounidis, C., Pardalos, P.M. (eds) Managing in Uncertainty: Theory and Practice. Applied Optimization, vol 19. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-2845-3_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-2845-3_23

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-4801-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-2845-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics