Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Natural Resource Management and Policy ((NRMP,volume 23))

Abstract

This chapter connects assumptions about probability distributions, decision makers’ risk attitudes, and the resulting methods used to order risky choices. The methods we discuss are consistent with the expected utility hypothesis because up to this point in time no alternative for decision making under risk has gained widespread acceptance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Hadar, J., and W.R. Russell. 1969. “Rules for Ordering Uncertain Prospects.” American Economic Review 59: 25–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanoch, G., and H. Levy. 1969. “Efficiency Analysis of Choices Involving Risk.” Review of Economic Studies 38: 335–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kimball, M. 1993. “Standard Risk Aversion.” Economnetrica 61: 589–611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, R., and L. Robison. 1981. “An Interval Approach to Measuring Decision Maker Preferences.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 63: 510–520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kramer, R.A., and R.D. Pope. 1981. “Participation in Farm Commodity Programs: A Stochastic Dominance Analysis.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 63: 119–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, D.J., and J. Meyer. 2001. “Habit Formation Utility, the Equity Premium Puzzle, and Risk Preferences in Multi-Period Consumption Models.” Draft Working Paper (January).

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J. 1977. “Choice Among Distributions.” Journal of Economic Theory 14: 326–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J. 1987. “Two Moment Decision Models and Expected Utility Maximization.” American Economic Review 77: 421–430.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J., and R.H. Rasche. 1992. “Sufficient Conditions for Expected Utility to Imply Mean-Standard Deviation Rankings: Empirical Evidence Concerning the Location and Scale Condition.” The Economic Journal 102: 91–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pope, R.D., and R.F. Ziemer. 1984. “Stochastic Efficiency, Normality, and Sampling Errors in Agricultural Risk Analysis.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 66: 31–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robison, L.J., and P.J. Barry. 1987. The Competitive Firm’s Response to Risk. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robison, L.J., and L. Lev. 1986. “Distinguishing Between Indirect and Direct Outcome Variables to Predict Choices Under Risk or Why Woody Chip Went to the Air.” North Central Journal of Agricultural Economics 8: 59–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothschild, M., and J.E. Stiglitz. 1971. “Increasing Risk II: Its Economic Consequences.” Journal of Economic Theory 2: 66–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinn, H.-W. 1983. Economic Decisions Under Uncertainty. New York: North-Holland Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Robison, L.J., Myers, R.J. (2002). Ordering Risky Choices. In: Just, R.E., Pope, R.D. (eds) A Comprehensive Assessment of the Role of Risk in U.S. Agriculture. Natural Resource Management and Policy, vol 23. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-3583-3_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-3583-3_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-4924-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-3583-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics