Skip to main content

Carotid Endarterectomy: A Challenge for Scientific Medicine

  • Chapter
Prevention of Stroke
  • 161 Accesses

Abstract

Carotid endarterectomy (CE) was introduced very shortly after cerebral angiography identified the extracranial portion of the carotid artery as a common site responsible for stroke-threatening transient ischemic attacks (TIA). On the face of it, it was, and to many remains, as logical a surgical activity as the removal of an acoustic neuroma or the clipping of a saccular intracranial aneurysm. Why, then, has the procedure fallen afoul of universal acceptance? The reasons are several:

  1. 1.

    In the case of a ruptured aneurysm, the mortality, let alone the morbidity, from a recurrent hemorrhage is close to 50%. The survivors have almost an equal chance of being left with a serious disability. The TIA patient has at least a 90% chance of going through each successive year after the initial event(s) without a serious outcome.

  2. 2.

    If a stroke does occur, there is at least a 30% chance of its being in another arterial territory from that of the artery that caused the presenting symptoms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bisch L, Lee KI, Mark E. Major Causes of Death, Canada 1989. Chronic Diseases in Canada, Health and Welfare Canada, 1989; pp 22–24.

    Google Scholar 

  2. MacMahon S, Peto R, Cutler J, et al. Part 1: Prolonged differences in blood pressure: prospective observational studies corrected for the regression dilution bias. Lancet. 1990;335:765–774.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Collins R, Peto R, MacMahon HP, et al. Part 2: Short-term reductions in blood pressure: overview of randomized drug trials in their epidemiological context. Lancet. 1990;335:827–838.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Walker WJ. Change in per capita consumption in the United States 1963–1980. N Engl J Med. 1983;308: 649–651.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Antiplatelet Trialists’ Collaboration. Secondary prevention of vascular disease by prolonged antiplatelet treatment. Br Med J. 1988;296:320–331.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gent M, Blakely JA, Easton JD, et al. The Canadian-American Ticlopidine Study (CATS) in thromboembolic stroke. Lancet. 1989;1215–1220.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hass WK, Easton JD, Adams HP, et al. A randomized trial comparing Ticlopidine hydrochloride with Aspirin for the prevention of stroke in high-risk patients. New Engl J Med. 1989;321:501–507.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Dyken ML, Pokras R. The performance of endarterectomy for disease of the extracranial arteries of the head. Stroke. 1984;15:948–950.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Dyken ML. Carotid endarterectomy studies: a glimmering of science (editorial). Stroke. 1986;17:355–358.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Ernest FIV, Forbes G, Sandok BA, et al. Complications of cerebral angiography: Prospective assessment of risk. AJNR. 1983;4:1191–1197.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Dion JE, Gates PC, Fox AJ, et al. Clinical events following neuroangiography: a prospective study. Stroke. 1987;18:997–1004.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Fisher B, Bauer M, Margolese R, et al. Five-year results of a randomized clinical trial comparing total mastectomy and segmental mastectomy with or without radiation in the treatment of breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 1985;312:665–673.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. The EC/IC Bypass Study Group. Failure of extracranial-intracranial arterial bypass to reduce the risk of ischemic stroke. New Engl J Med. 1985; 393:1191–1200.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Fields WS, Maslenikov V, Meyer JS, et al. Joint study of extracranial arterial occlusion. JAMA. 1970;211:1993–2003.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Shaw DA, Venables GS, Cartlidge NEF, et al. Carotid endarterectomy in patients with transient cerebral ischemia. J Neurol Sci. 1984;64:45–53.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Chambers BR, Norris JW. Outcome in patients with asymptomatic neck bruits. N Engl J Med. 1986; 315:860–865.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Barnett HJM, Plum F, Walton JN. Carotid endarterectomy-an expression of concern. Stroke. 1984; 15:941–943.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Caplan LR. Carotid-artery disease (editorial). N Engl J Med. 1987;315:886–888.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Warlow CP. Carotid endarterectomy: does it work? Stroke. 1984;15:1068–1076.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Trobe JD. Carotid endarterectomy: who needs it? Ophthalmology. 1987;94:725–730.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Pokras R, Dyken ML. Dramatic changes in the performance of endarterectomy for diseases of the extracranial arteries of the head. Stroke. 1988;19: 1289–1290.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. News programs 20/20, Nightline. ABC Television, New York, New York, February 6, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Califano JA Jr. Billions blown on health. New York Times, 12 April 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ludtyke M. Physician, inform thyself. New York Times Magazine, 16 April 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Rich S. Califano calls U.S. health bill at least $125 billion too high. Washington Post. 9 May 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Surtees L. Doubts on operation make it hard to find patients for research. Toronto Globe and Mail, 17 June 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Katz S. Do you really need surgery? Chatelaine. August 1989;65–67.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Beebe HG, Clagett GP, DeWeese JA, et al. Assessing risk associated with carotid endarterectomy: a statement for health professionals by an ad hoc committee on carotid surgery standards of the Stroke Council, American Heart Association. Circulation. 1979; 2:314–315.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Feussner JR, Matchar DB. When and how to study the carotid arteries. Ann Intern Med. 1988;109:805–818.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Callow AD, Caplan LR, Correll JW, et al. Carotid endarterectomy-what is its current status? Am J Med. 1988;85:835–838.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Interim assessment: carotid endarterectomy: report of the American Academy of Neurology, Therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subcommittee. Neurology. 1990;40: 682–683.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Committee of Health Care Issues. American Neurological Association. Does carotid endarterectomy decrease stroke and death in patients with transient ischemic attacks? Ann Neurol. 1987;22:72–76.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Winslow CM, Solomon DH, Chassin MR, et al. The appropriateness of carotid endarterectomy. N Engl J Med. 1988;318:721–727.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Lord RSA. Surgery of Occlusive Cerebrovascular Disease. St. Louis, MO: C.V. Mosby Company; 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Hertzer NR. Presidential address. Carotid endarterectomy — a crisis in confidence. J. Vasc. Surg. 1988; 7:611–619.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Thompson JE. Don’t throw out the baby with the bath water. A perspective on carotid endarterectomy. J Vasc Surg. 1986;4:543–545.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Goldring S, Zervas N, Langfitt T. The extracranial-intracranial bypass study: a report of the committee appointed by the American Association of Neurological Surgeons to examine the study. N Engl J Med. 1987;316:817–820.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Sundt I. Was the international randomized trial of an extracranial-intracranial arterial bypass representative of the population at risk? N Engl J Med. 1987; 316:814–816.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Relman A. The extracranial-intracranial arterial bypass study—what have we learned? N Engl J Med. 1987;316:809–810.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Barnett, HJM, Sackett D, Taylor DW, et al. Are the results of the extracranial-intracranial bypass trial generalizable? N Engl J Med. 1987;316:820–824.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Chalmers TC, Meier P, Plum F. The EC/IC bypass study (letter to the editor). N Engl J Med. 1987; 317:1030–1031.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Hobson RW II, Towne J. Carotid endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid stenosis (editorial). Stroke. 1989;20:575–576.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1991 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Barnett, H.J.M. (1991). Carotid Endarterectomy: A Challenge for Scientific Medicine. In: Norris, J.W., Hachinski, V.C. (eds) Prevention of Stroke. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-4226-8_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-4226-8_14

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4757-4228-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-4226-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics