Skip to main content

Using Cognitive Grammar, Natural Phonology, and Item Response Theory to Explain ESL Subjects’ Control of the [D] and [Z] Morphemes

  • Chapter
Language Proficiency

Abstract

Our purpose in this paper is to apply selected notions from cognitive grammar, natural phonology, and item response theory in order to give better insight on ESL subjects’ processing of the D and Z morphemes in English.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Berko, Jean. 1961. The child’s learning of English morphology. In Sol Saporta (Ed.), Psycholinguistics. A Book of Readings. New York: Holt, Rhinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brutten, Sheila R., John T. Mouw, and Kyle Perkins. 1985. The effect of instruction on ESL speaker control of the D and Z morphemes. Paper presented at the Delaware Symposium VII on Language Studies. October 25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hambleton, Ronald K. and Hariharan Swaminathan. 1985. Item Response Theory. Principles and Applications. Boston: Kluwer. Nijhoff Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langacker, Ronald. 1982. Space grammar, analysability, and the English passive. Language, 58, 22–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lumsden, J. 1976. Test theory. In M.R. Rosenzweig and L.W. Porter (Eds.), Annual Review of Psychology. Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nathan, Geoffrey S. 1986. Phonemes as mental categories. In V. Nikiforidou, Mary Van Clay, M. Niepokuj, and D. Feder (Eds.), Proceedings of the Twelfth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (pp. 212–223). Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society, University of California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosch, Eleanor. 1973. On the internal structure of perceptual and semantic categories. In T.E. Moore (Ed.), Cognitive Development and the Acquisition of Language. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosch, Eleanor. 1977. Human categorization. In Neil Warren (Ed.), Studies in Cross-Cultural Psychology, Vol. 1. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosch, Eleanor. 1978. Principles of categorization. In Eleanor Roscn and Barbara Lloyd (Eds.), Cognition and Categorization. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1990 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Perkins, K., Brutten, S.R. (1990). Using Cognitive Grammar, Natural Phonology, and Item Response Theory to Explain ESL Subjects’ Control of the [D] and [Z] Morphemes. In: Arena, L.A. (eds) Language Proficiency. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-0870-4_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-0870-4_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4899-0872-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4899-0870-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics