Abstract
Implicit in the title of this chapter is the idea that there can be a gap—potentially a very large one—between the interests of psychology as a profession and the interests of our clients and society as a whole. To George Bernard Shaw’s contemporary followers, those who believe with him that all professions are conspiracies against the laity, it hardly could be otherwise. For many practicing psychologists, however, this idea may seem not only unacceptable but unthinkable. To them, a profession, because it is predicated on the service ethic, must perforce be in the public interest. Nonetheless, professionals, like other people, are guided not only by our desire to do good for others, but by our desire to do all right for ourselves. There is more than one aspect to our motivation. We are influenced not only by the public interest, but by our guild interests: the desire for increased income, social acceptance, influence, and power. The problem for us, and for society, is that these separate interests can and do pull us in different directions. When they do, which way will we turn? Former APA president M. Brewster Smith (1976) has called attention to the “natural tendency” of “APA lobbying and related activity ... to gravitate toward the guild rather than the public interest component” (p. 2).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Accounting: The good guys. Newsweek, January 7, 1974, pp. 57-58.
Ad Hoc Committee on Advocacy. The Social worker as advocate: Champion of social victims. Social Work, 1969, 14, 16–17.
Adams, S., & Orgel, M. Through the mental health maze. Washington, D.C.: Public Citizen’s Health Research Group, 1975.
Agel, J. The radical therapist. New York: Ballantine, 1971.
Alinsky, S. D. Rules for radicals. New York: Random House, 1971.
American Psychological Association. Ethical standards of psychologists. Washington, D.C.: Author, 1963.
American Psychological Association. Committee on Scientific and Professional Responsibility. Social influences on the standards of psychologists. American Psychologist, 1964, 19, 167–173.
American Psychological Association. Psychology as a profession. Washington, D.C.: Author, 1968.
American Psychological Association. Psychology and national health care. American Psychologist, 1971, 26, 1025–1026.
American Psychological Association. Guidelines for conditions of employment of psychologists. American Psychologist, 1972, 27, 331–334.
American Psychological Association. Standards for educational and psychological tests. Washington, D.C.: Author, 1974.(a).
American Psychological Association. Standards for providers of psychological services. Washington, D.C.: Author, 1974.(b).
American Psychological Association. Bylaws of the American Psychological Association. In Biographical Directory, Washington, D.C.: Author, 1975.
American Psychological Association and Conference of State Psychological Associations, Committees on Legislation. Joint report of the APA and CSPA Committees on Legislation. American Psychologist, 1955, 10, 727–756.
Armstrong, J. S. Social irresponsibility in management. Journal of Business Research, 1977, 5, 185–213.
Aug, S. M. Accounting aid without advocacy. Washington Star, October 25, 1977, p. B5.
Bandura, A. An encouraging change. APA Monitor, January 1975, p. 12.
Banfield, E. C. Note on conceptual scheme. In M. Meyerson & E. C. Banfield (Eds.), Politics, planning and the public interest. New York: Free Press, 1955.
Barber, P. Screening criticism rejected. Reno Gazette, November 29, 1977, p. 12.
Bauer, R. A. Can psychologists be socially relevant? Professional Psychology, 1971, 2, 111–117.
Bentham, J. An introduction to the principles of morals and legislation. New York: Hafner, 1948.
Bernal, E. M. A response to “Educational uses of tests with disadvantaged subjects.” American Psychologist, 1975, 30, 93–95.
Berry, J. M. Lobbying for the people: The political behavior of public interest groups. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1977.
Caplan, N., & Nelson, S. D. On being useful: The nature and consequences of psychological research on social problems. American Psychologist, 1973, 28, 199–211.
Cassinelli, C. W. The public interest in political ethics. In C. J. Friedrich (Ed.), The public interest. New York: Atherton, 1962.
Chein, I. The science of behavior and the image of man. New York: Basic Books, 1972.
Citibank. The public interest. The Washington Post, February 22, 1978, p. D16.
Cleary, T. A., Humphreys, L. G., Kendrick, S. A., & Wesman, A. Educational uses of tests with disadvantaged students. American Psychologist, 1975, 30, 15–41.
Cochran, C. C. Political science and “the public interest.” Journal of Politics, 1974, 36, 327–355.
Cohen, H. S., & Miike, L. H. Toward a more responsive system of professional licensure. International Journal of Health Services, 1974, 4, 265–272.
Combs, A. W. Problems and definitions in legislation. American Psychologist, 1953, 8, 554–563.
Conger, J. Proceedings of the American Psychological Association, Incorporated, for the year 1976. American Psychologist, 1977, 32, 408–438.
Dailey, J. T., & Pickrel, E. W. Some psychological contributions to defense against hyjackers. American Psychologist, 1975, 30, 161–165.
Department of Health, Education and Welfare. Report on licensure and related health personnel credentialing. (DHEW Publication No. HSM 72-11) Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1971.
Deutsch, C. P. After legislation—what price psychology. American Psychologist, 1958, 13, 645–52.
Down, A. Inside bureacracy. Boston: Little, Brown, 1967.
Durlak, J. A. Comparative effectiveness of paraprofessional and professional helpers. Psychological Bulletin, 1979, 86, 80–92.
Eastman, H. Statement on S:1210: A bill to protect “whistle blowers.” Testimony presented to the Subcommittee on Administative Practice and Procedure, Committee on the Judiciary, United States Senate, June 13, 1975.
Edsall, J. Scientific freedom and responsibility. Washington, D.C.: American Association for the Advancement of Science, 1975.
Ellis, A. Pros and cons of legislation for psychologists. American Psychologist, 1953, 8, 551–53.
Fairweather, G. W., Sanders, D. H., & Tornatzky, L. G. Creating change in mental health organizations. New York: Pergamon, 1974.
Finkler, E. Dissent and independent initiative in planning offices. Planning Advisory Service Reports, 1971, Report #269.
Flathman, R. E. The public interest: An essay concerning the normative discourse of politics. New York: Wiley, 1966.
Freedman, J. One social worker’s fight for mental patients’ rights. Social Work, 1971, 16, 92–95.
Freundenberger, H. J. Burnout: Occupational hazard of the child care worker. Child Care Quarterly, 1977, 6(2), 90–99.
Friedman, E. A call to action. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 1973, 2, 4–5.
Friedman, M. Capitalism and freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1962.
Friedrich, C. J. (Ed.). The public interest. New York: Atherton, 1962.
Gaylin, W., Glasser, I., Marcus, S., & Rothman, D. Doing good: The limits of benevolence. New York: Pantheon Books, 1978.
Gellhorn, W. Individual freedom and governmental restraints. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, 1936.
Glenn, M., & Kunnes, R. Repression or revolution? Therapy in the United States today. New York: Harper & Row, 1973.
Goode, W. J. Encroachment, charlatanism, and the emerging profession: Psychology, sociology, and medicine. American Sociological Review, 1960, 25, 902–914.
Goodman, C. Whistleblowing and free speech. Paper presented at the meeting of the International Personnel Management Association, Anaheim, California, October 1975.
Goodwin, L. Can social science help resolve national problems? New York: Free Press, 1975.
Green, M. J. The perils of public interest law. New Republic, September 20,1975, p. 20-23.
Gross, S. J. The myth of professional licensing. American Psychologist, 1978, 33, 1009–1016.
Halleck, S. L. The politics of therapy. New York: Science House, 1971.
Hardin, G. The tragedy of the commons. Science, 1968, 162, 1243–1248.
Hardin, G., & Baden, J. (Eds.). Managing the commons. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman, 1977.
Havelock, R. G., & Havelock, M. C. Training for change agents: A guide to the design of tracing programs in education and other fields. Ann Arbor, Michigan: Institute for Social Research, 1973.
Held, V. The public interest and individual interests. New York: Basic Books, 1970.
Henley, N. Facing down the man. In J. Agel (Ed.), Rough times. New York: Ballantine, 1973.
Hentoff, N. Striking to be professional. Village Voice, July 12, 1973, p. 27.
Hogan, D. B. The regulation of psychotherapists (Vol. 1): A study in the philosophy and practice of professional regulation. Cambridge, Mass.: Ballinger, 1979.
Hornstein, H. A., Bunker, B. B., Burke, W. W., Gindes, M., & Lewicki. Social intervention: A behavioral science approach. New York: Free Press, 1971.
Houg, M. R., & Sussman, M. B. Professional autonomy and the revolt of the client. Social Problems, 1969, 17, 153–161.
Howard, J. M., & Somers, R. H. Resisting institutional evil from within. In N. Sanford & C. Comstock (Eds.), Sanctions for evil. Boston: Beacon Press, 1971.
Hurvitz, N. Psychotherapy as a means of social control. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1973, 40, 232–239.
Jackson, G. D. On the report of the ad hoc Committee on Educational Uses of Tests with Disadvantaged Students. American Psychologist, 1975, 30, 88–93.
Jones, W. H. Activist economists. Washington Post, February 25, 1973, p. LI.
Kahn, S. How people get power. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1970.
Kaplan, A. The conduct of inquiry. San Francisco: Chandler, 1964.
Katzell, R. A., & Thompson, A. S. Some comments on “After legislation...” American Psychologist, 1958, 13, 652–654.
Kohl, H. Half the house. New York: Bantam, 1976.
Koocher, G. P. Credentialing in psychology: Close encounters with competence? Unpublished manuscript, 1978.
Kopolow, L. E., & Bloom, H. (Eds.). Mental health advocacy: An emerging force in consumers’ rights. (DHEW Publication No. (ABM) 77–455). Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1977.
Korten, F. F., Cook, S. W., & Lacey, J. I. (Eds.). Psychology and the problems of society. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association, 1970.
Krause, M. S., & Howard, K. L. Program evaluation in the public interest: A new research methodology. Community Mental Health Journal, 1976, 12, 291–300.
Kutchins, H., & Kutchins, S. Advocacy and social work. In G. H. Weber & G. J. McCall (Eds.), Social scientists as advocates: Views from the applied disciplines. Beverley Hills, Calif.: Sage, 1978.
Lawrence, E. S. Where angels fear to tread: Reply to Spaner. In F. F. Korten, S. W. Cook, & J. I. Lacey (Eds.), Psychology and the problems of society. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association, 1970.
League of Women Voters. Public action kit. Washington, D.C.: Author, 1976.
Levine, D. The danger of social action. In D. Harshbarger & R. F. Maley (Eds.), Behavioral analysis and systems analysis. Kalamazoo: Behavioredelia, 1974.
Lindauer, M. J. Government employee disclosures of agency wrongdoing: Protecting the right to blow the whistle. University of Chicago Law Review, 1975, 42, 530–561.
Lippett, R. The dynamics of planned change. New York: Harcourt Brace, 1958.
Lippman, W. Essays in the public philosophy. Boston: Little, Brown, 1955.
Marks, F. R., Leswing, K., & Fortinsky, B. The lawyer, the public, and professional responsibility. Chicago: American Bar Foundation, 1972.
Marston, A. R. Reflections after a confrontation with the Gay Liberation Front. Professional Psychology, 1974, 5, 380–384.
Maslach, C. Burned-out. Human Behavior, 1978, 7(9), 16–22.
Matthews v. Washington, Civil Action No. 76-0918, December 22,1976, U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia.
Maurizi, A. Occupational licensing and the public interest. Journal of Political Economy, 1974, 82, 399–413.
McConochie, W. A. Letter to the editor. Oregon Psychological Association Newsletter, February 1973, p. 5.
Miller, A. Whistleblowing and the law. In R. Nader, P. Petkas, & K. Blackwell (Eds.), Whistle blowing: The report of the conference on professional responsibility. New York: Bantam, 1972.
Minogue, K. Common good (The). In M. Cranston (Ed.), A glossary of political terms; A background book. London: Bodley Head, 1966.
Mitnick, B. M. A topology of conceptions of the public interest. Administration & Society, 1976, 8, 5–28.
Mobil. Who’s the public in “public interest” politics? Washington Post, November 4, 1979, p. C2.
Moore, T. G. The purpose of licensing. Journal of Law and Economics, 1961, 4, 93–117.
Nader, R. An anatomy of whistle blowing. In R. Nader, P. Petkas, & K. Blackwell (Eds.), Whistle blowing: The report of the conference on professional responsibility. New York: Bantam, 1972.
Nader, R., Petkas, P., & Blackwell, K. (Eds.). Whistle blowing: The report of the conference on professional responsibility. New York: Bantam, 1972.
National Institute of Mental Health. Planning for creative change in mental health service: A distillation of principles on research utilization (Vol. 1). Publication No. (HSM) 71–9060. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1972.
National written examination. American Association of State Psychology Boards Newsletter, 1978, 24(1), 9–15.
Nietzel, M. T., & Moss, C. S. The psychologist in the criminal justice system. Professional Psychology, 1972, 3, 259–270.
Nord, W. R. The failure of current applied behavioral science—a Marxian perspective. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 1974, 10, 557–578.
O. M. Collective. The organizer’s manual. New York: Bantam, 1971.
Olley, R. E. The future of self-regulation: A consumer economist’s viewpoint. In P. Slayton & M. J. Trebilcock (Eds.), The professions and public policy. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1978.
Oppenheimer, M., & Lakey, G. A manual for direct action. Chicago: Quadrangle, 1964.
Patti, R. J. Limitations and prospects of internal advocacy. Social Casework, 1974, 55, 537–545.
Patti, R. J., & Resnick, H. Changing the agency from within. Social Work, 1972, 17, 48–57.
Peatman, J. G. The problem of protecting the public by appropriate legislation for the practice of psychology. American Psychologist, 1950, 5, 102–3.
Pennock, J. R. The one and the many: A note on the concept. In C. J. Friedrich (Ed.), The public interest. New York: Atherton, 1962.
Perl, M., Primack, J., & von Hippel, F. Public-interest science—An overview. Physics Today, 1974, 27, 23–31.
Peters, C., & Branch, T. Blowing the whistle: Dissent in the public interest. New York: Praeger, 1972.
Pfeffer, J. Some evidence on occupational licensing and occupational incomes. Social Forces, 1974, 53, 102–111.
Pickering v. Board of Education, 391 U.S. 563 (1968).
Primack, J., & von Hippel, F. Advice and dissent: Scientists in the political arena. New York: New American Library, 1974.
Ralph Nader assesses consumer movements future. Washington Post, August 5, 1979, p. F1.
Rappaport, J. Education, training, and dealing with the contingent future. Unpublished manuscript, 1978.
Ricks, J. H. Certifying psychologists in New York state. In, Competent or incompetent—Decisions from examinations. Symposium presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, Montreal, August 1973.
Rogers, C. Some new challenges. American Psychologist, 1973, 28, 379–87.
Ross, D. K. A public citizen’s action manual. New York: Grossman, 1973.
Rothman, J. Planning and organizing for social change: Action principles from social science research. New York: Columbia University, 1974.
Ryan, W. Blaming the victim. New York: Random House, 1971.
Sanford, D. Me & Ralph: Is Nader unsafe for America? Washington, D.C.: New Republic, 1976.
Schubert, G. Is there a public interest theory? In C. J. Friedrich (Ed.), The public interest. New York: Atherton, 1962.
Scriven, M. “First the roses...” APA Monitor, 1975, 6, 2–3.
Simon, G. C. Professional psychology and the public interest: The report of the summer intern project on increasing professional activity in the public interest. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association, 1973.
Simon, G. C. Psychology and the “treatment rights movement.” Professional Psychology, 1975, 6, 243–251.
Simon, G. C. Ethical and social issues in professional psychology. In B. Wolman (Ed.), International encyclopedia of psychiatry, psychology, psychoanalysis and neurology (Vol. 4). New York: Aesculapius 1977.
Simon, G. C. The psychologist as whistle blower: A case study. Professional Psychology, 1978, 9, 322–40.
Smith, M. B. A fond farewell. APA Monitor, 1976, 7(4), 2.
Sorauf, F. J. The conceptual model. In C. J. Friedrich (Ed.), The public interest. New York: Atherton, 1962.
Spaner, F. E. The psychotherapist as an activity in social change: A proponent. In F. F. Korten, S. W. Cook, & J. I. Lacey (Eds.), Psychology and the problems of society. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association, 1970.
Specht, H. Disruptive tactics. Social Work, 1969, 14, 5–15.
Specter, G. Power: A repossession manual; organizing strategies for citizens. Amherst: University of Massachusetts, 1978.
Stein, D. The community psychologist as advocate: His role and his training. International Journal of Mental Health, 1974, 3, 127–138.
Stigall, T. Comment on Hogan. APA Monitor, September/October 1979, p. 36-37.
Suchotlif, L. C., Steinfeld, G. J., & Tolchin, G. The struggle for patients’ rights in a state hospital. Mental Hygiene, 1970, 54, 230–240.
Sullivan, J. B. Working with citizen’s groups. Physics Today, June 1974, p. 32-37.
Tabachnik, L. Licensing in the legal and medical professions, 1820–1860: A historical case study. In J. Gerstl & G. Jacobs (Eds.), Professions for the people: The politics of skill. New York: Schenkman, 1976.
Talbott, J. A. Radical psychiatry: An examination of the issues. American Journal of Psychiatry, 1974, 131, 121–128.
Tarasoff v. Regents of Univ. of Cal., 529 P.2d 342, 118 Cal. Rptr. 129 (1974), vacated, 17 Cal.3d 425, 551 P.2d 384, 131 Cal. Rptr. 14 (1976).
von Hippel, F., & Primack, J. Public interest science. Science, 1972, 177, 1166–1171.
Warren, R., & Warren, D. I. The neighborhood organizer’s guidebook. Notre Dame. University of Notre Dame Press, 1977.
Weisband, E., & Franck, T. M. Resignation in protest. New York: Penguin Books, 1976.
What is the public interest? Newsweek, March 25,1974, pp. 60-62.
Whyte, W. F. Organizational behavior: Theory and applications. Homewood, Ill.: Irwin-Dorsey, 1969.
Wineman, D., & James, A. The advocacy challenge to schools of social work. Social Work, 1969, 14, 23–32.
Witmer, J. M. Professional disclosure in licensure. Personnel and Guidance Journal, 1978, 38, 71–73.
Wolfinger, R. E., Shapiro, M., & Greenstein, F. Dynamics of American politics. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1976.
Wright, C. ‘Pro Bono’ Cases grow for accounting group. Washington Post, April 9,1978, p. K14.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1983 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Simon, G.C. (1983). Psychology, Professional Practice, and the Public Interest. In: Sales, B.D. (eds) The Professional Psychologist’s Handbook. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-1025-7_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-1025-7_16
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4899-1027-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-4899-1025-7
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive