Skip to main content

Psychology, Professional Practice, and the Public Interest

  • Chapter
The Professional Psychologist’s Handbook

Abstract

Implicit in the title of this chapter is the idea that there can be a gap—potentially a very large one—between the interests of psychology as a profession and the interests of our clients and society as a whole. To George Bernard Shaw’s contemporary followers, those who believe with him that all professions are conspiracies against the laity, it hardly could be otherwise. For many practicing psychologists, however, this idea may seem not only unacceptable but unthinkable. To them, a profession, because it is predicated on the service ethic, must perforce be in the public interest. Nonetheless, professionals, like other people, are guided not only by our desire to do good for others, but by our desire to do all right for ourselves. There is more than one aspect to our motivation. We are influenced not only by the public interest, but by our guild interests: the desire for increased income, social acceptance, influence, and power. The problem for us, and for society, is that these separate interests can and do pull us in different directions. When they do, which way will we turn? Former APA president M. Brewster Smith (1976) has called attention to the “natural tendency” of “APA lobbying and related activity ... to gravitate toward the guild rather than the public interest component” (p. 2).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Accounting: The good guys. Newsweek, January 7, 1974, pp. 57-58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ad Hoc Committee on Advocacy. The Social worker as advocate: Champion of social victims. Social Work, 1969, 14, 16–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adams, S., & Orgel, M. Through the mental health maze. Washington, D.C.: Public Citizen’s Health Research Group, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agel, J. The radical therapist. New York: Ballantine, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alinsky, S. D. Rules for radicals. New York: Random House, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Psychological Association. Ethical standards of psychologists. Washington, D.C.: Author, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Psychological Association. Committee on Scientific and Professional Responsibility. Social influences on the standards of psychologists. American Psychologist, 1964, 19, 167–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • American Psychological Association. Psychology as a profession. Washington, D.C.: Author, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Psychological Association. Psychology and national health care. American Psychologist, 1971, 26, 1025–1026.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • American Psychological Association. Guidelines for conditions of employment of psychologists. American Psychologist, 1972, 27, 331–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • American Psychological Association. Standards for educational and psychological tests. Washington, D.C.: Author, 1974.(a).

    Google Scholar 

  • American Psychological Association. Standards for providers of psychological services. Washington, D.C.: Author, 1974.(b).

    Google Scholar 

  • American Psychological Association. Bylaws of the American Psychological Association. In Biographical Directory, Washington, D.C.: Author, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Psychological Association and Conference of State Psychological Associations, Committees on Legislation. Joint report of the APA and CSPA Committees on Legislation. American Psychologist, 1955, 10, 727–756.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, J. S. Social irresponsibility in management. Journal of Business Research, 1977, 5, 185–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aug, S. M. Accounting aid without advocacy. Washington Star, October 25, 1977, p. B5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. An encouraging change. APA Monitor, January 1975, p. 12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banfield, E. C. Note on conceptual scheme. In M. Meyerson & E. C. Banfield (Eds.), Politics, planning and the public interest. New York: Free Press, 1955.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barber, P. Screening criticism rejected. Reno Gazette, November 29, 1977, p. 12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, R. A. Can psychologists be socially relevant? Professional Psychology, 1971, 2, 111–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentham, J. An introduction to the principles of morals and legislation. New York: Hafner, 1948.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernal, E. M. A response to “Educational uses of tests with disadvantaged subjects.” American Psychologist, 1975, 30, 93–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berry, J. M. Lobbying for the people: The political behavior of public interest groups. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caplan, N., & Nelson, S. D. On being useful: The nature and consequences of psychological research on social problems. American Psychologist, 1973, 28, 199–211.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cassinelli, C. W. The public interest in political ethics. In C. J. Friedrich (Ed.), The public interest. New York: Atherton, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chein, I. The science of behavior and the image of man. New York: Basic Books, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Citibank. The public interest. The Washington Post, February 22, 1978, p. D16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cleary, T. A., Humphreys, L. G., Kendrick, S. A., & Wesman, A. Educational uses of tests with disadvantaged students. American Psychologist, 1975, 30, 15–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cochran, C. C. Political science and “the public interest.” Journal of Politics, 1974, 36, 327–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, H. S., & Miike, L. H. Toward a more responsive system of professional licensure. International Journal of Health Services, 1974, 4, 265–272.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Combs, A. W. Problems and definitions in legislation. American Psychologist, 1953, 8, 554–563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conger, J. Proceedings of the American Psychological Association, Incorporated, for the year 1976. American Psychologist, 1977, 32, 408–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dailey, J. T., & Pickrel, E. W. Some psychological contributions to defense against hyjackers. American Psychologist, 1975, 30, 161–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Department of Health, Education and Welfare. Report on licensure and related health personnel credentialing. (DHEW Publication No. HSM 72-11) Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, C. P. After legislation—what price psychology. American Psychologist, 1958, 13, 645–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Down, A. Inside bureacracy. Boston: Little, Brown, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durlak, J. A. Comparative effectiveness of paraprofessional and professional helpers. Psychological Bulletin, 1979, 86, 80–92.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Eastman, H. Statement on S:1210: A bill to protect “whistle blowers.” Testimony presented to the Subcommittee on Administative Practice and Procedure, Committee on the Judiciary, United States Senate, June 13, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edsall, J. Scientific freedom and responsibility. Washington, D.C.: American Association for the Advancement of Science, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, A. Pros and cons of legislation for psychologists. American Psychologist, 1953, 8, 551–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fairweather, G. W., Sanders, D. H., & Tornatzky, L. G. Creating change in mental health organizations. New York: Pergamon, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finkler, E. Dissent and independent initiative in planning offices. Planning Advisory Service Reports, 1971, Report #269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flathman, R. E. The public interest: An essay concerning the normative discourse of politics. New York: Wiley, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freedman, J. One social worker’s fight for mental patients’ rights. Social Work, 1971, 16, 92–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freundenberger, H. J. Burnout: Occupational hazard of the child care worker. Child Care Quarterly, 1977, 6(2), 90–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, E. A call to action. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 1973, 2, 4–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. Capitalism and freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedrich, C. J. (Ed.). The public interest. New York: Atherton, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaylin, W., Glasser, I., Marcus, S., & Rothman, D. Doing good: The limits of benevolence. New York: Pantheon Books, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gellhorn, W. Individual freedom and governmental restraints. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, 1936.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glenn, M., & Kunnes, R. Repression or revolution? Therapy in the United States today. New York: Harper & Row, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goode, W. J. Encroachment, charlatanism, and the emerging profession: Psychology, sociology, and medicine. American Sociological Review, 1960, 25, 902–914.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, C. Whistleblowing and free speech. Paper presented at the meeting of the International Personnel Management Association, Anaheim, California, October 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, L. Can social science help resolve national problems? New York: Free Press, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, M. J. The perils of public interest law. New Republic, September 20,1975, p. 20-23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gross, S. J. The myth of professional licensing. American Psychologist, 1978, 33, 1009–1016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halleck, S. L. The politics of therapy. New York: Science House, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardin, G. The tragedy of the commons. Science, 1968, 162, 1243–1248.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hardin, G., & Baden, J. (Eds.). Managing the commons. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Havelock, R. G., & Havelock, M. C. Training for change agents: A guide to the design of tracing programs in education and other fields. Ann Arbor, Michigan: Institute for Social Research, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Held, V. The public interest and individual interests. New York: Basic Books, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henley, N. Facing down the man. In J. Agel (Ed.), Rough times. New York: Ballantine, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hentoff, N. Striking to be professional. Village Voice, July 12, 1973, p. 27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogan, D. B. The regulation of psychotherapists (Vol. 1): A study in the philosophy and practice of professional regulation. Cambridge, Mass.: Ballinger, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hornstein, H. A., Bunker, B. B., Burke, W. W., Gindes, M., & Lewicki. Social intervention: A behavioral science approach. New York: Free Press, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Houg, M. R., & Sussman, M. B. Professional autonomy and the revolt of the client. Social Problems, 1969, 17, 153–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howard, J. M., & Somers, R. H. Resisting institutional evil from within. In N. Sanford & C. Comstock (Eds.), Sanctions for evil. Boston: Beacon Press, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurvitz, N. Psychotherapy as a means of social control. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1973, 40, 232–239.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, G. D. On the report of the ad hoc Committee on Educational Uses of Tests with Disadvantaged Students. American Psychologist, 1975, 30, 88–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, W. H. Activist economists. Washington Post, February 25, 1973, p. LI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahn, S. How people get power. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, A. The conduct of inquiry. San Francisco: Chandler, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katzell, R. A., & Thompson, A. S. Some comments on “After legislation...” American Psychologist, 1958, 13, 652–654.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohl, H. Half the house. New York: Bantam, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koocher, G. P. Credentialing in psychology: Close encounters with competence? Unpublished manuscript, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kopolow, L. E., & Bloom, H. (Eds.). Mental health advocacy: An emerging force in consumers’ rights. (DHEW Publication No. (ABM) 77–455). Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korten, F. F., Cook, S. W., & Lacey, J. I. (Eds.). Psychology and the problems of society. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krause, M. S., & Howard, K. L. Program evaluation in the public interest: A new research methodology. Community Mental Health Journal, 1976, 12, 291–300.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kutchins, H., & Kutchins, S. Advocacy and social work. In G. H. Weber & G. J. McCall (Eds.), Social scientists as advocates: Views from the applied disciplines. Beverley Hills, Calif.: Sage, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, E. S. Where angels fear to tread: Reply to Spaner. In F. F. Korten, S. W. Cook, & J. I. Lacey (Eds.), Psychology and the problems of society. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • League of Women Voters. Public action kit. Washington, D.C.: Author, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine, D. The danger of social action. In D. Harshbarger & R. F. Maley (Eds.), Behavioral analysis and systems analysis. Kalamazoo: Behavioredelia, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindauer, M. J. Government employee disclosures of agency wrongdoing: Protecting the right to blow the whistle. University of Chicago Law Review, 1975, 42, 530–561.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lippett, R. The dynamics of planned change. New York: Harcourt Brace, 1958.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lippman, W. Essays in the public philosophy. Boston: Little, Brown, 1955.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marks, F. R., Leswing, K., & Fortinsky, B. The lawyer, the public, and professional responsibility. Chicago: American Bar Foundation, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marston, A. R. Reflections after a confrontation with the Gay Liberation Front. Professional Psychology, 1974, 5, 380–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maslach, C. Burned-out. Human Behavior, 1978, 7(9), 16–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews v. Washington, Civil Action No. 76-0918, December 22,1976, U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maurizi, A. Occupational licensing and the public interest. Journal of Political Economy, 1974, 82, 399–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McConochie, W. A. Letter to the editor. Oregon Psychological Association Newsletter, February 1973, p. 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, A. Whistleblowing and the law. In R. Nader, P. Petkas, & K. Blackwell (Eds.), Whistle blowing: The report of the conference on professional responsibility. New York: Bantam, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minogue, K. Common good (The). In M. Cranston (Ed.), A glossary of political terms; A background book. London: Bodley Head, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitnick, B. M. A topology of conceptions of the public interest. Administration & Society, 1976, 8, 5–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mobil. Who’s the public in “public interest” politics? Washington Post, November 4, 1979, p. C2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, T. G. The purpose of licensing. Journal of Law and Economics, 1961, 4, 93–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nader, R. An anatomy of whistle blowing. In R. Nader, P. Petkas, & K. Blackwell (Eds.), Whistle blowing: The report of the conference on professional responsibility. New York: Bantam, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nader, R., Petkas, P., & Blackwell, K. (Eds.). Whistle blowing: The report of the conference on professional responsibility. New York: Bantam, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Institute of Mental Health. Planning for creative change in mental health service: A distillation of principles on research utilization (Vol. 1). Publication No. (HSM) 71–9060. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • National written examination. American Association of State Psychology Boards Newsletter, 1978, 24(1), 9–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nietzel, M. T., & Moss, C. S. The psychologist in the criminal justice system. Professional Psychology, 1972, 3, 259–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nord, W. R. The failure of current applied behavioral science—a Marxian perspective. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 1974, 10, 557–578.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O. M. Collective. The organizer’s manual. New York: Bantam, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olley, R. E. The future of self-regulation: A consumer economist’s viewpoint. In P. Slayton & M. J. Trebilcock (Eds.), The professions and public policy. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oppenheimer, M., & Lakey, G. A manual for direct action. Chicago: Quadrangle, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patti, R. J. Limitations and prospects of internal advocacy. Social Casework, 1974, 55, 537–545.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patti, R. J., & Resnick, H. Changing the agency from within. Social Work, 1972, 17, 48–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peatman, J. G. The problem of protecting the public by appropriate legislation for the practice of psychology. American Psychologist, 1950, 5, 102–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pennock, J. R. The one and the many: A note on the concept. In C. J. Friedrich (Ed.), The public interest. New York: Atherton, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perl, M., Primack, J., & von Hippel, F. Public-interest science—An overview. Physics Today, 1974, 27, 23–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters, C., & Branch, T. Blowing the whistle: Dissent in the public interest. New York: Praeger, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J. Some evidence on occupational licensing and occupational incomes. Social Forces, 1974, 53, 102–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickering v. Board of Education, 391 U.S. 563 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  • Primack, J., & von Hippel, F. Advice and dissent: Scientists in the political arena. New York: New American Library, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ralph Nader assesses consumer movements future. Washington Post, August 5, 1979, p. F1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rappaport, J. Education, training, and dealing with the contingent future. Unpublished manuscript, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricks, J. H. Certifying psychologists in New York state. In, Competent or incompetent—Decisions from examinations. Symposium presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, Montreal, August 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, C. Some new challenges. American Psychologist, 1973, 28, 379–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross, D. K. A public citizen’s action manual. New York: Grossman, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothman, J. Planning and organizing for social change: Action principles from social science research. New York: Columbia University, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, W. Blaming the victim. New York: Random House, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanford, D. Me & Ralph: Is Nader unsafe for America? Washington, D.C.: New Republic, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schubert, G. Is there a public interest theory? In C. J. Friedrich (Ed.), The public interest. New York: Atherton, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scriven, M. “First the roses...” APA Monitor, 1975, 6, 2–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, G. C. Professional psychology and the public interest: The report of the summer intern project on increasing professional activity in the public interest. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, G. C. Psychology and the “treatment rights movement.” Professional Psychology, 1975, 6, 243–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, G. C. Ethical and social issues in professional psychology. In B. Wolman (Ed.), International encyclopedia of psychiatry, psychology, psychoanalysis and neurology (Vol. 4). New York: Aesculapius 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, G. C. The psychologist as whistle blower: A case study. Professional Psychology, 1978, 9, 322–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M. B. A fond farewell. APA Monitor, 1976, 7(4), 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorauf, F. J. The conceptual model. In C. J. Friedrich (Ed.), The public interest. New York: Atherton, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spaner, F. E. The psychotherapist as an activity in social change: A proponent. In F. F. Korten, S. W. Cook, & J. I. Lacey (Eds.), Psychology and the problems of society. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Specht, H. Disruptive tactics. Social Work, 1969, 14, 5–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Specter, G. Power: A repossession manual; organizing strategies for citizens. Amherst: University of Massachusetts, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein, D. The community psychologist as advocate: His role and his training. International Journal of Mental Health, 1974, 3, 127–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stigall, T. Comment on Hogan. APA Monitor, September/October 1979, p. 36-37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suchotlif, L. C., Steinfeld, G. J., & Tolchin, G. The struggle for patients’ rights in a state hospital. Mental Hygiene, 1970, 54, 230–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, J. B. Working with citizen’s groups. Physics Today, June 1974, p. 32-37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tabachnik, L. Licensing in the legal and medical professions, 1820–1860: A historical case study. In J. Gerstl & G. Jacobs (Eds.), Professions for the people: The politics of skill. New York: Schenkman, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Talbott, J. A. Radical psychiatry: An examination of the issues. American Journal of Psychiatry, 1974, 131, 121–128.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tarasoff v. Regents of Univ. of Cal., 529 P.2d 342, 118 Cal. Rptr. 129 (1974), vacated, 17 Cal.3d 425, 551 P.2d 384, 131 Cal. Rptr. 14 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  • von Hippel, F., & Primack, J. Public interest science. Science, 1972, 177, 1166–1171.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Warren, R., & Warren, D. I. The neighborhood organizer’s guidebook. Notre Dame. University of Notre Dame Press, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisband, E., & Franck, T. M. Resignation in protest. New York: Penguin Books, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • What is the public interest? Newsweek, March 25,1974, pp. 60-62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whyte, W. F. Organizational behavior: Theory and applications. Homewood, Ill.: Irwin-Dorsey, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wineman, D., & James, A. The advocacy challenge to schools of social work. Social Work, 1969, 14, 23–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witmer, J. M. Professional disclosure in licensure. Personnel and Guidance Journal, 1978, 38, 71–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfinger, R. E., Shapiro, M., & Greenstein, F. Dynamics of American politics. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, C. ‘Pro Bono’ Cases grow for accounting group. Washington Post, April 9,1978, p. K14.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1983 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Simon, G.C. (1983). Psychology, Professional Practice, and the Public Interest. In: Sales, B.D. (eds) The Professional Psychologist’s Handbook. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-1025-7_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-1025-7_16

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4899-1027-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4899-1025-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics