Skip to main content

The Human Roles in Space

  • Chapter
Space 2000
  • 60 Accesses

Abstract

Traditionally, the subject of this chapter would be expressed as the usual question: Should the space program be manned or unmanned? The traditional way of asking this question is both sexist and misleading. Human beings play an essential role in any space mission, whether or not the mission involves astronauts in space. There is no such thing as an “unmanned” space mission, because humans control and interact with the machines we put in space in a growing variety of ways. The focus of this chapter is really on the variety of roles that people can play in the space program, particularly people who actually travel into space. So far, humans have been spacecraft operators and controllers, test objects, pilots, scientist-explorers, experimenters, repairers, symbols, and ambassadors. Soon to appear will be space travel writers (a role that will include the teachers and journalists) and builders. In the longer run, we can see people as tourists, and possibly even as colonists. Studies of the human response to the zero-gravity environment show no fundamental limitations on what humans can do in space in the short run, though there may be some effects that will limit long-duration existence in space (such as would be required for a human expedition to Mars).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Reference Notes

  1. Stephen B. Hall, ed., The Human Role in Space (Park Ridge, NJ: Noyes Publications, 1985); published by arrangement with NASA-Marshall Space Flight Center.

    Google Scholar 

  2. M. Smith, “The Evolving Role of Man in Space,” in Theodore R. Simpson, eds., The Space Station: An Idea Whose Time Has Come (New York: IEEE Press, 1985), 3–31; talk to the 1983 meeting of the AAAS, available on tapes AAAS83–17 and -18. Many of the roles discussed in this chapter are roles Smith identified, though I have added a few in considering the future.

    Google Scholar 

  3. James E. Oberg and Alcestis R. Oberg, Pioneering Space: Living on the Next Frontier (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1986), 41–62.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Joseph P. Allen with Russell Martin, Entering Space: An Astronaut’s Odyssey, 2nd ed. (New York: Stewart, Tabori, & Chang, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  5. James E. Oberg, Red Star in Orbit (New York: Random House, 1981), 183–201.

    Google Scholar 

  6. S. Matsunaga, The Mars Project: Journeys beyond the Cold War (New York: Hill & Wang, 1986), 164.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kerry Mark Joels and Gregory P. Kennedy, The Space Shuttle Operator’s Manual (New York: Ballantine Books, 1982), 6.2–6.6); Oberg, 99–102.

    Google Scholar 

  8. J. Flinn, Wilmington Morning News, 29 March 1986; S. Nichols, Wilmington Sunday News-Journal, (31 August 1986): G2.

    Google Scholar 

  9. G. K. O’Neill, “The Colonization of Space,” Physics Today (September 1974): 32–40.

    Google Scholar 

  10. See Gerard K. O’Neill, The High Frontier: Human Colonies in Space (New York: Morrow, 1976);

    Google Scholar 

  11. O’Neill, 2081: A Hopeful View of the Future (New York: Simon & Schuster, 1981);

    Google Scholar 

  12. T. A. Heppenheimer, Colonies in Space (Harrisburg, PA: Stakpole Books, 1977);

    Google Scholar 

  13. Richard D. Johnson and Charles Holbrow, eds., Space Settlements: A Design Study, NASA SP-413 (Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1977);

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gerard O’Neill, John Billingham, Brian O’Leary, and Beulah Gossett, eds., Space Resources and Space Settlements, NASA SP-428 (Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  15. A discussion of the merits of various proposed colony locations is contained in Heppenheimer, 109–113.

    Google Scholar 

  16. For costs of the colony, see NASA SP-413, pp. 139–153.

    Google Scholar 

  17. For a guarded, but generally skeptical, view of the solar-power satellite system, see U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment, Solar Power Satellites (Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1981). The comparison of the efficiencies of terrestrial and space solar generators is on p. 128; the environmental hazards are reviewed in Chapter 8.

    Google Scholar 

  18. James A. Van Allen, “Myths and Realities of Space Right,” Science 232, (30 May 1986): 1075–1076; for letters, see Science 233, (8 August 1986): 610–611. An earlier reference to Van Allen’s views in contrast with my own is given in Chapter 2 of this book.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. S. E. Morison, Admiral of the Ocean Sea (Boston: Little, Brown, 1942).

    Google Scholar 

  20. F. Dyson, Disturbing the Universe (New York: Harper & Row, 1979), 118–126.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Recall Chapter 2.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Tom Wolfe, The Right Stuff (New York: Bantam, 1983), Ch. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  23. A summary of physiological responses to spaceflight is given in Arnauld E. Nicogossian and James F. Parker, Space Physiology and Medicine, NASA SP-447 (Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1982), 127–139.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Nicogossian and Parker, 206.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Michael Modell and Jack M. Spurlock, “Rationale for Evaluating a Closed Food Chain for Space Habitats,” in T. Stephen Cheston and David L. Winter, eds., Human Factors of Outer Space Production (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1980), AAAS Selected Symposium Series, Vol. 50, pp. 134–142.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Harlan F. Brose, “Environmental Control and Life Support (ECLS) Design Optimization Approach,” in Mireille Gerard and Pamela W. Edwards, eds., Space Station: Policy, Planning, and Utilization (New York: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 1983), 191.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Quoted in Oberg and Oberg, 129.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Oberg and Oberg, Ch. 12.

    Google Scholar 

  29. See Yvonne Clearwater, “A Human Place in Outer Space,” Psychology Today 19, no. 7 (July 1985): 34–43;

    Google Scholar 

  30. Mary M. Connors, Albert A. Harrison, and Faren R. Akins, Living Aloft: Human Requirements for Extended Spaceflight, NASA SP-483 (Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  31. D. Kent, personal interview, 14 May 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Connors et ai, 152.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Clearwater, 43.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1987 Harry L. Shipman

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Shipman, H.L. (1987). The Human Roles in Space. In: Space 2000. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-6054-2_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-6054-2_13

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-306-42534-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4899-6054-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics