Skip to main content

Patient Self-Reported Adjustment and Health Beliefs in Compliant versus Noncompliant Hemodialysis Patients

  • Chapter
Psychonephrology 2

Abstract

It is universally assumed among health care professionals in nephrology that compliance to diet and fluid restrictions predicts survival on chronic dialysis. The consequences of noncompliance are more immediate and potentially lethal than in every other chronic disease syndrome. In one of the first clinical studies in this area, eight of the ten fatalities were patients who abused the fluid and dietary regimens.1 Inasmuch as the suicide rate is noted to be far higher than that of the healthy adult population and that nearly all patients abuse their restrictions, noncompliance is tacitly or explicitly linked to patient suicide.2

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Kaplan De-Nour, A., and Czaczkes, J. W. Personality factors in chronic hemodialysis patients causing noncompliance with medical regimen. Psychosomatic Medicine, 1972, 34, 333–344.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Abram, H. S., Moore, G. I., and Westervelt, F. B., Jr. Suicidal behavior in chronic dialysis patients. American Journal of Psychiatry, 1972, 127, 1199–1204.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dunbar, J. Issues in assessment. In S. J. Cohen (Ed.), New directions in patient compliance. Lexington, Massachusetts: D. C. Heath and Company, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Caron, H. S., and Roth, H. P. Patients’ cooperation with a medical regimen. Journal of the American Medical Association, 1968, 203, 120–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Roth, H. P., and Caron, H. S. Accuracy of doctors’ estimates and patients’ statements of adherence to a drug regimen. Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 1978, 23, 361–370.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Park, L. C, and Lipman, R. S. A comparison of patient dosage deviation reports with pill counts. Psychopharmacologia, 1964, 6, 299–302.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Roth, H. P. Problems in conducting a study of the effects on patient compliance of teaching the rationale for antacid therapy. In S. J. Cohen (Ed.), New directions in patient compliance. Lexington, Massachusetts: D. C. Heath and Company, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hartman, P. E., and Becker, M. H. Non-compliance with prescribed regimen among chronic hemodialysis patients: a method of prediction and educational diagnosis. Dialysis and Transplantation, 1978, 7, 978–981; 984; 986; 988-989.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Blackburn, S. L. Dietary compliance of chronic hemodialysis patients. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 1977, 70, 31–37.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Levy, N. B. The psychology and care of the maintenance hemodialysis patient. Heart and Lung, 1973, 2, 400–405.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Germain, C. B., and Gitterman, A. The life of social work practice. New York: Columbia University Press, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Steidl, J. H., Finkelstein, F. Wexler, J. Feignenbaum, H., Kitsen, J., Kliger, A. S., and Quinlan, D. M. Medical condition, adherence to treatment regimen, and family functioning. Archives of General Psychiatry, 1980, 37, 1025–1027.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Becker, M. H. The role of the patient: social and psychological factors in noncompliance. In L. Lasagna (Ed.), Patient compliance. Mount Kisco, New York: Futura Publishing, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Becker, M. H. Understanding patient compliance: the contributions of attitudes and other psychosocial factors. In S. J. Cohen (Ed.), New directions in patient compliance. Lexington, Massachusetts: D. C. Heath and Company, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  15. DeRogatis, L. R., Lipman, R. S., Rickels, K., Uhlenhuth, E. H., and Covi, L. The Hopkins Symptom Checklist (HSCL). In P. Pichot (Ed.), Psychological measurements in psychopharmacology. S. Karger, Basel, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  16. DeRogatis, L. R., and Cleary, P. A. Factorial invariance across gender for the primary symptom dimensions of the SCL-90. British Journal of Social and Clinical Pathology, 1977, 16, 347–356.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Tinsley, H. E. A., and Weiss, D. J. Interrater reliability and agreement of subjective judgments. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 1975, 22, 358–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Sherwood, R. J., and Avram, M. M. The ecological approach to compliance behavior: A realistic model for assessment and intervention. Unpublished manuscript, Long Island College Hospital, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1983 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Armstrong, S., Woods, A. (1983). Patient Self-Reported Adjustment and Health Beliefs in Compliant versus Noncompliant Hemodialysis Patients. In: Levy, N.B., Mattern, W., Freedman, A.M. (eds) Psychonephrology 2. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-6669-8_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-6669-8_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4899-6671-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4899-6669-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics