Skip to main content
  • 1806 Accesses

Abstract

There is still a controversy over the use of residual income as a tool for the measurement of the performance of units and managers in divisionalized organizations. This has been highlighted by the recent debate in this journal between Cyril Tomkins [1, 2] and Lloyd Amey [3]. Tomkins advocates the use of residual income for profit centres where control over working capital is vested with the division, although he dismisses it as redundant for full investment centres. Amey specifically denies the appropriateness of residual income in either case. David Solomons [4] originally proposed residual income as a measure capable of separately appraising the performance of both an investment centre and its manager. There is thus wide disagreement as to the validity and usefulness of residual income. The objective of this note is to outline the practical and theoretical benefits and limitations of the residual income concept as a means of appraising performance in divisionalized organizations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Tomkins C.R. ‘Another Look at Residual Income’, Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, Spring 1975, pp. 39-53.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Tomkins C.R. ‘Residual Income — A Rebuttal of Professor Amey’s Arguments’, Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, Summer 1975, pp. 161-168.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Amey L.R. ‘Tomkins on “Residual Income”’, Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, Spring 1975, pp. 55-68.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Solomons D., Divisional Performance: Measurement and Control, Irwin, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Amey L.R., op. cit., p. 58.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Amey L.R., The Efficiency of Business Enterprises, George Allen and Unwin, 1969, p. 145.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Tomkins C.R., Financial Planning in Divisionalized Companies, Accountancy Age, 1973, pp. 23-24.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Mauriel J.J. & Anthony R.N., ‘Misevaluation of Investment Centre Performance’, Harvard Business Review, March–April, 1966, pp. 98-105.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Tomkins C.R., op. cit., pp. 172-175.

    Google Scholar 

  10. ‘Who makes the Profit Decision?’, Dun’s Review and Modern Industry, Vol. 80 No. 3, September 1962, (quoted in Solomons [4]).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Morgan J. & Luck M., Managing capital investment, Mantec, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Solomons D., op. cit., p. 155.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Bromwich M., ‘Measurement of Divisional Performance: A Comment and an Extension’, Accounting and Business Research, Spring 1973, pp. 123-132.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hopwood A.G., An Accounting System and Managerial Behaviour, Saxon House, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Amey L.R., op. cit., pp. 61-65.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lipsey R.G., An Introduction to Positive Economics, Weidenfeld and Nicholson, 1963, p. 482.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Baumol W.J., Economic Theory and Operations Analysis, Prentice-Hall, 1965, p. 315.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Samuelson P.A., Economics, McGraw-Hill, 1967, p. 443.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Flower J.F., ‘Measurement of Divisional Performance’, Accounting and Business Research, No. 3 Summer 1971, pp. 205-214.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Henderson B.D. & Dearden J., ‘New System for Divisional Control’, Harvard Business Review, September–October, 1966, pp. 144-160.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Robichek A.A. & Myers, S.C., Optimal Financing Decisions, Prentice-Hall, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Fawthrop R.A., ‘Underlying Problems in Discounted Cash Flow Appraisal’, Accounting and Business Research, Summer 1971, pp. 187-198.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Hertz D.B., ‘Risk Analysis in Capital Investment’, Harvard Business Review, January–February, 1964, pp. 95-106.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Shwayder K., ‘A Proposed Modification to Residual Income — Interest Adjusted Income’, The Accounting Review, April 1970, pp. 299-307.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Amey L.R., op. cit., p. 144.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Henderson B.D. & Dearden J., op. cit.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1976 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Emmanuel, C.R., Otley, D.T. (1976). The usefulness of residual income. In: Emmanuel, C., Otley, D., Merchant, K. (eds) Readings in Accounting for Management Control. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-7138-8_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-7138-8_17

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-412-41490-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4899-7138-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics