Skip to main content

Abstract

In the previous chapter, standard DEA models analyzing the performance of DMUs producing multiple outputs using multiple inputs were presented. These models provide a useful starting point for analyzing educational and other public sector production processes. One of the key distinguishing features of public sector publication is the presence of non-discretionary environmental factors of production that introduces heterogeneity among decision making units. It is well known, for example, that socioeconomic factors such as income, poverty, parental education etc. play a large role in the production of output. In fire services, the material of the houses (brick vs. wood) determines how successful firefighters will be in putting out fires. In health care, preexisting conditions and age of the patients could determine the success of a particular treatment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Estelle, Johnson, and Ruggiero (2010) compare and contrast using OLS, tobit, fractional logit and nonparametric regression in the second stage. The results provide similar results.

  2. 2.

    In the multiple stage model presented later in the chapter, the assumption of a monotonically increasing relationship between output and the environmental factors is dropped.

  3. 3.

    For programming purposes, we refer to the nondiscretionary input as z 1. In Sect. 3.5 we consider the multiple stage model when there are multiple nondiscretionary variables.

  4. 4.

    The environmental scale measures can be defined using either a VRS or CRS technology. We follow Ruggiero (2000) and only consider VRS measures.

  5. 5.

    Alternatively, we could remove scale inefficiency from this measure by using the constant returns to scale projections.

  6. 6.

    The output results are modified for formatting purposes.

  7. 7.

    We could define an index of environmental harshness based on the ratio of minimum costs

  8. 8.

    This variable is labeled C1 in the SAS code that follows.

  9. 9.

    Other regression procedures have been considered. For example, McCarty and Yaisawarng (1993) used Tobit. Banker and Natarajan (2008) provided the conditions under which OLS provided consistent parameter estimates. McDonald (2009) argued that Tobit is inappropriate and recommend either OLS or fractional logit. Estelle et al. (2010) provided a Monte Carlo analysis using OLS, Tobit, fractional logit and nonparametric regression. The models provided nearly identical results. In this chapter, we only consider OLS.

References

  • Banker, R., & Natarajan, R. (2008). Evaluating contextual variables affecting productivity using data envelopment analysis. Operations Research, 56, 48–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Estelle, S., Johnson, A., & Ruggiero, J. (2010). Three-stage DEA models for incorporating exogenous inputs. Computers and Operations Research, 37, 1087–1090.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haelermans, C., & Ruggiero, J. (2013). Estimating technical and allocative efficiency in the public sector: A nonparametric analysis of Dutch Schools. European Journal of Operational Research, 227(1), 174–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCarty, T., & Yaisawarng, S. (1993). Technical efficiency in New Jersey School Districts. In H. O. Fried, C. A. K. Lovell, & S. S. Schmidt (Eds.), The measurement of productive efficiency (pp. 271–287). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, J. (2009). Using least squares and tobit in second stage DEA efficiency analyses. European Journal of Operational Research, 197, 792–798.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ray, S. (1991). Resource-use efficiency in Public Schools: A study of connecticut data. Management Science, 37, 1620–1628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruggiero, J. (1998). Non-discretionary inputs in data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 111, 461–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruggiero, J. (2000). Nonparametric estimation of returns to scale in the Public Sector with an application to the provision of educational services. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 51, 906–912.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Blackburn, V., Brennan, S., Ruggiero, J. (2014). DEA in the Public Sector. In: Nonparametric Estimation of Educational Production and Costs using Data Envelopment Analysis. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, vol 214. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-7469-3_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics