Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Public Administration and Information Technology ((PAIT,volume 21))

  • 642 Accesses

Abstract

The Internet and related technologies have dramatically changed the way we live, work, socialize, and even topple national governments. It is not surprising that they would have a sizeable impact on the way local governments relate to the public, especially their own citizens. As was the case with previous communication technology breakthroughs, such as radio and television, early commentators predicted that the Internet would revolutionize public administration and politics; as we gain some perspective and experience, we find more often that governments adopt Information Communication Technologies (ICTs) as part of their toolbox for facilitating efficient and citizen-oriented service delivery at all levels of government. Local governments, which by definition are the closest to their citizens, have not been an exception to this trend. Local governments across the industrialized democracies have adopted ICTs to facilitate electronic government or e-government in the areas of information dissemination, service delivery, and citizen engagement in government. With a focus on e-government at the local level, this study pursues both a macro and micro perspective of e-government functionality in the federal republics of Germany and the United States and unitary France and Japan. The macro perspective focuses on the state and scope of e-government functionality across a large number of randomly selected municipalities of all sizes in these advanced industrialized countries. Based on a small sample of case studies, the micro perspective analyzes the successful implementation of e-government in Seattle (United States), Nuremberg (Germany), Bordeaux (France), and Shizuoka City (Japan).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Baldersheim, H., & Kersting, N. (2012). The wired city: A new face of power? A citizen perspective. In K. Mossberger & S. E. Clarke (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of urban politics (pp. 590–606). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, F. S., & Berry, W. D. (1999). Innovation and diffusion models in policy research. In P. A. Sabatier (Ed.), Theories of the policy process (pp. 169–200). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, F. S., & Berry, W. D. (2007). Innovation and diffusion models in policy research. In P. A. Sabatier (Ed.), Theories of the policy process (2nd ed., pp. 169–200). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bingham, D. R. (1978). Innovation, bureaucracy, and public policy: A study of innovation adoption by local government. The Western Political Quarterly, 31(June), 178–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chadwick, A. (2003). Bringing e-democracy back in: Why it matters for future research on e-governance. Social Science Computer Review, 21(4), 443–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • City of Shizuoka. (2014). Shizuoka statistics. City of Shizuoka, Japan: Planning Division.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coursey, D., & Norris, D. (2008). Models of e-government: Are they correct? An empirical assessment. Public Administration Review, 68(May/June), 523–536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haug, V. A. (2007). Local democracy on-line: Driven by crisis, legitimacy, resources, or communication gaps? Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 4(2), 79–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hernon, P. (2006). E-government in the United Kingdom. In P. Hernon, R. Cullen, & H. C. Relyea (Eds.), Comparative perspectives on e-government (pp. 55–65). Lanham, MD: The Scarecrow Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hiller, J., & Belanger, F. (2002). Privacy strategies for electronic government. In M. A. Abramson & G. E. Means (Eds.), E-government 2001. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • infoDev/World Bank. (2009). E-government primer. Washington, DC: World Bank. Retrieved June 30, 2014, from http://www.infodev.org/publications

  • Jensen, J. L. (2004). A multi-population comparison of the diffusion of public organizations and policies across space and time. The Policy Studies Journal, 32(1), 109–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, C., & Berry, F. S. (2011). Testing the development and diffusion of e-government and e-democracy: A global perspective. Public Administration Review, 71(3), 444–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miyazaki, T. (2013). Municipal consolidation and local government behavior: Evidence from Japanese voting data on merger referenda (Discussion Paper Series A No. 588). Fukuoka, Japan: Department of Economics, Kyushu University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohr, L. B. (1969). Determinants of innovation in organizations. American Political Science Review, 75, 963–974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moon, J. M. (2002). The evolution of e-government among municipalities: Rhetoric or reality? Public Administration Review, 62(4), 424–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National League of Cities. (2013). Number of municipal governments & population distribution. Retrieved June 29, 2014, from http://www.nlc.org/build-skills-and-networks/resources/cities101/city-structures/number-of-municipal-governments-and-population-distribution

  • Nilsen, K. (2006). E-government in Canada. In P. Hernon, R. Cullen, & H. C. Relyea (Eds.), Comparative perspectives on e-government (pp. 66–83). Lanham, MD: The Scarecrow Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petroni, G., & Tagliente, L. (2005). E-government in the Republic of San Marino: Some successful initiatives. In G. Petroni & F. Cloete (Eds.), New technologies in public administration (pp. 23–37). Amsterdam: IOS Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, J. K. (2006). “E” the people: Do U.S. municipal government web sites support public involvement? Public Administration Review, 66(May/June), 341–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Statistisches Bundesamt. (2013). Statistisches Jahrbuch 2013. Bevölkerung, Familien, Lebensformen. Retrieved June 29, 2014, from https://www.destatis.de/DE/Publikationen/StatistischesJahrbuch/Bevoelkerung.pdf?__blob=publicationFile

  • Wohlers, T., & Bernier, L. (2012). Innovative city hall: A comparative case study of policy adoption in the U.S. and France. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 9(4), 415–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wohlers, T.E., Bernier, L.L. (2016). Introduction. In: Setting Sail into the Age of Digital Local Government. Public Administration and Information Technology, vol 21. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-7665-9_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-7665-9_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4899-7663-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4899-7665-9

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics