Skip to main content

Relationships Between Adaptive Behavior and Impairment

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Assessing Impairment

Abstract

Adaptive behavior generally refers to one’s ability to meet daily living responsibilities and to respond to the needs of others. The American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities (AAIDD) defines adaptive behavior as “the collection of conceptual, social, and practical skills that have been learned and are performed by people in their everyday lives” (AAIDD, 2010, p. 76). The AAIDD’s 2010 definition cited three primary domains of that constitute adaptive behavior: conceptual skills, social skills, and practical skills. The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) emphasizes the importance of these domains in its diagnostic criteria for intellectual disability (intellectual developmental disorder) (American Psychiatric Association (APA), 2013).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disorders. (2010). Intellectual disability: Definitions, classifications, and systems of supports (11th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Bar Association. Task Force on Mental Disability and the Death Penalty. (2006). Recommendations and report on the death penalty and persons with mental disabilities. Mental and Physical Disability Law Reporter, 30, 668–677.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, and National Council on Measurement in Education. (2014). The standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Psychiatric Association. (1995). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed., international version with ICD-10 codes). Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Psychiatric Association (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed., text revision). Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • American Psychological Association. (2002, amended 2010). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Apling, R. N., & Jones, N. L. (2005). Congressional Research Service report for Congress, Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): Analysis of changes made by P. L. 108–446. Washington, DC: Library of Congress.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkins v Virginia. (2002). 536 U.S. 304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bölte, S., & Poustka, F. (2002). The relation between general cognitive level and adaptive behavior domains in individuals with autism with and without co-morbid mental retardation. Child Psychiatry and Human Development, 33, 165–172.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bonnie, R. J. (2004). The American Psychiatric Association’s resource document on mental retardation and capital sentencing: Implementing Atkins v Virginia. Journal of the American Association of Psychiatry and the Law, 32, 304–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonnie, R. J., & Gustafson, K. (2007). The challenges of implementing Atkins v Virginia: How legislatures and courts can promote accurate assessments and adjudications of mental retardation in death penalty cases. University of Richmond Law Review, 41, 810–860.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruininks, R., Woodcock, R., Weatherman, R., & Hill, B. (1996). Scales of independent behavior—Revised. Chicago: Riverside.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, C., Prior, M., & Kinsella, G. (2002). The relationship between executive function abilities, adaptive behaviour, and academic achievement in children with externalizing behaviour problems. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 43, 785–796.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Council for Exceptional Children. (2004). The new IDEA: CEC’s summary of significant issues. Arlington, VA: Council for Exceptional Children

    Google Scholar 

  • Ditterline, J., Banner, D., Oakland, T., & Becton, D. (2008). Adaptive behavior profiles of students with disabilities. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 24, 191–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duvall, J. C., & Morris, R. J. (2006). Assessing mental retardation in death penalty cases: Critical issues for psychology and psychological practice. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 37, 658–665.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, J. W. (2003). Mental retardation and the death penalty: A guide to legislative issues. Mental and Physical Disability Law Reporter, 27(1), 11–24.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Endicott, J., Spitzer, R. L., Fleiss, J. L., & Cohen, J. (1976). The global assessment scale. Archives of General Psychiatry, 33, 766–771.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fisch, G. S., Simensen, R. J., & Schroer, R. J. (2002). Longitudinal changes in cognitive and adaptive behavior scores in children and adolescents with the fragile X mutation or autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 32, 107–114.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, B. J., Del’Homme, M., Guthrie, D., & Zhang, F. (1999). Vineland adaptive behavior scale scores as a function of age and initial IQ in 210 autistic children. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 29, 379–384.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gilotty, L., Kenworthy, L., Sirian, L., Black, D. O., & Wagner, A. E. (2002). Adaptive skills and executive function in autism spectrum disorders. Child Neuropsychology, 8, 241–248.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hall v. Florida. (2014). 572 U.S.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, P. (1990). Mental retardation, adaptive behavior assessment, and giftedness. In A. S. Kaufman (Ed.), Assessing adolescent and adult intelligence (pp. 533–585). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, P., & Oakland, T. (2003). Technical report: Adaptive behavior assessment system (2nd ed.). San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, P., & Oakland, T. (2015). Adaptive behavior assessment system (3rd ed.). San Antonio, TX: Harcourt Assessment.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kostanjsek, T. B., Chatterji, S., & Rehm, J. (2010). Measuring health and disability: Manual for WHO disability assessment schedule WHODAS 2.0.. Geneva: World Health Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leigh, J. (1987). Adaptive behavior of children with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 9, 557–562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liss, M., Harel, B., Fein, D., Allen, D., Dunn, M., Feinstein, C., et al. (2001). Predictors and correlates of adaptive functioning in children with developmental disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 31, 219–230.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Maccow, G., & Zlomke, L. (2001). Review of the scales of independent behavior—Revised. In B. Plake & J. Impara (Eds.), The fourteenth mental measurements yearbook. Lincoln, NE: Buros Institute of Mental Measurements.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olley, J. G., & Cox, A. W. (2008). Assessment of adaptive behavior in adult forensic cases: The use of the Adaptive Behavior Assessment System-II. In T. Oakland & P. Harrison (Eds.), Adaptive Behavior Assessment System-II: Use, interpretation, and application in assessment practice (pp. 198–214). New York: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olley, J. G., Greenspan, S., & Switzky, H. (2006). Division 33 Ad Hoc Committee on mental retardation and the death penalty. Psychology in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 31(2), 11–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2004). Equity in education: Students with disabilities, learning difficulties, and disadvantages. Paris: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reschly, D. J. (1990). Best practices in adaptive behavior. In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology (2nd ed., pp. 29–42). Washington, DC: National Association of School Psychologists.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schatz, J., & Hamdan-Allen, G. (1995). Effects of age and IQ on adaptive behavior domains for children with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 25, 51–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Social Security Administration. (2015). Disability evaluation under social security. SSA Publication Number 64-039 ICN 468600. Retrieved March 30, 2015, from http://www.ssa.gov/disability/professionals/bluebook/

  • Sparrow, S. S., & Cicchetti, D. V. (1987). Adaptive behavior and the psychologically disturbed child. Journal of Special Education, 21, 89–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sparrow, S., Cicchetti, D., & Balla, D. (2005). Vineland adaptive behavior scales (2nd ed.). Circle Pines, MN: AGS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sparrow, S., Cicchetti, D., & Balla, D. (2016). Vineland adaptive behavior scales (3rd ed.). Bloomington, MN: NCS, Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strawser, S., & Weller, C. (1985). Use of adaptive behavior and discrepancy criteria to determine learning disabilities severity subtypes. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 18, 205–212.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Code Service. (2007). 20 USCS Section 1400: Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. Retrieved June 12, 2007, from http://web.lexisnexis.com/universe/document?_m=6af9d78cf01c007d8151e26c38f4192dand_docnum=1andwchp=dGLbVlzzSkVband_md5=412bb646231d76b75426f221f837233a

  • U.S. Department of Education. (2006). The Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004. Retrieved June 13, 2007, from http://www.ed.gov/about/offices/list/osers/osep/index.html

  • Weller, C., & Strawser, S. (1987). Adaptive behavior of subtypes of learning disabled individuals. Journal of Special Education, 21, 102–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization. (1992a). The international classification of diseases and related health problems (10th ed.). Geneva: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization. (1992b). International statistical classification of disease and related health problems (10th rev.). Geneva: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization. (2001). International classification of functioning and disability. Geneva: Author.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeffrey Ditterline Ph.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ditterline, J., Oakland, T., McGoldrick, K.D. (2016). Relationships Between Adaptive Behavior and Impairment. In: Goldstein, S., Naglieri, J. (eds) Assessing Impairment. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-7996-4_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics