Skip to main content

Evaluation of Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy: From Angiography to Intravascular Ultrasound and Beyond

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Imaging Coronary Atherosclerosis

Part of the book series: Contemporary Cardiology ((CONCARD))

  • 1175 Accesses

Abstract

Cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality after heart transplantation and results from complex mechanisms ultimately leading to diffuse intimal hyperplasia throughout the coronary vasculature. Available treatment options, at best slow the progression of disease and if diagnosed late, outcomes remain poor. Early diagnosis of CAV is of critical importance as timely and aggressive treatments can be associated with improved long-term outcomes.

While noninvasive imaging techniques and routine coronary angiography have been utilized in establishing the diagnosis of CAV, intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) enables the clinician to determine the presence of disease with high sensitivity and early in its course. Improved diagnostic accuracy associated with IVUS has led to its emergence as the imaging modality of choice for the diagnosis of CAV in patients with heart transplantation. Serial, longitudinal assessment of the coronary vasculature with IVUS has led to improved understanding of disease progression and predictors of outcome.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Taylor DO, Stehlik J, Edwards LB, et al. Registry of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation: Twenty-sixth Official Adult Heart Transplant Report-2009. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2009;28:1007–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Robbins RC, Barlow CW, Oyer PE, et al. Thirty years of cardiac transplantation at Stanford university. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1999;117:939–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Tuzcu EM, Kapadia SR, Tutar E, et al. High prevalence of coronary atherosclerosis in asymptomatic teenagers and young adults: evidence from intravascular ultrasound. Circulation. 2001;103:2705–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Rahmani M, Cruz RP, Granville DJ, McManus BM. Allograft vasculopathy versus atherosclerosis. Circ Res. 2006;99:801–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ramzy D, Rao V, Brahm J, Miriuka S, Delgado D, Ross HJ. Cardiac allograft vasculopathy: a review. Can J Surg. 2005;48:319–27.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Jimenez J, Kapadia SR, Yamani MH, et al. Cellular rejection and rate of progression of transplant vasculopathy: a 3-year serial intravascular ultrasound study. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2001;20:393–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Billingham ME. Histopathology of graft coronary disease. J Heart Lung Transplant. 1992;11:S38–44.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Tuzcu EM, De Franco AC, Goormastic M, et al. Dichotomous pattern of coronary atherosclerosis 1 to 9 years after transplantation: insights from systematic intravascular ultrasound imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996;27:839–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Labarrere CA, Nelson DR, Faulk WP. Endothelial activation and development of coronary artery disease in transplanted human hearts. JAMA. 1997;278:1169–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Valantine HA. Cardiac allograft vasculopathy: central role of endothelial injury leading to transplant “atheroma”. Transplantation. 2003;76:891–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Suciu-Foca N, Ciubotariu R, Liu Z, Ho E, Rose EA, Cortesini R. Persistent allopeptide reactivity and epitope spreading in chronic rejection. Transplant Proc. 1998;30:2136–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Colvin-Adams M, Agnihotri A. Cardiac allograft vasculopathy: current knowledge and future direction. Clin Transplant. 2011;25:175–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Weis M, von Scheidt W. Cardiac allograft vasculopathy: a review. Circulation. 1997;96:2069–77.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Keogh AM, Valantine HA, Hunt SA, et al. Impact of proximal or midvessel discrete coronary artery stenoses on survival after heart transplantation. J Heart Lung Transplant. 1992;11:892–901.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Fang JC, Rocco T, Jarcho J, Ganz P, Mudge GH. Noninvasive assessment of transplant-associated arteriosclerosis. Am Heart J. 1998;135:980–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Akosah KO, Mohanty PK, Funai JT, et al. Noninvasive detection of transplant coronary artery disease by dobutamine stress echocardiography. J Heart Lung Transplant. 1994;13:1024–38.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Spes CH, Klauss V, Mudra H, et al. Diagnostic and prognostic value of serial dobutamine stress echocardiography for noninvasive assessment of cardiac allograft vasculopathy: a comparison with coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound. Circulation. 1999;100:509–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Elhendy A, van Domburg RT, Vantrimpont P, et al. Prediction of mortality in heart transplant recipients by stress technetium-99 m tetrofosmin myocardial perfusion imaging. Am J Cardiol. 2002;89:964–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hacker M, Tausig A, Romuller B, et al. Dobutamine myocardial scintigraphy for the prediction of cardiac events after heart transplantation. Nucl Med Commun. 2005;26:607–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Wu YW, Yen RF, Lee CM, et al. Diagnostic and prognostic value of dobutamine thallium-201 single-photon emission computed tomography after heart transplantation. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2005;24:544–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Sigurdsson G, Carrascosa P, Yamani MH, et al. Detection of transplant coronary artery disease using multidetector computed tomography with adaptative multisegment reconstruction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;48:772–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Pflugfelder PW, Boughner DR, Rudas L, Kostuk WJ. Enhanced detection of cardiac allograft arterial disease with intracoronary ultrasonographic imaging. Am Heart J. 1993;125:1583–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Costanzo MR, Naftel DC, Pritzker MR, et al. Heart transplant coronary artery disease detected by coronary angiography: a multiinstitutional study of preoperative donor and recipient risk factors. Cardiac Transplant Research Database. J Heart Lung Transplant. 1998;17:744–53.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Rickenbacher PR, Pinto FJ, Chenzbraun A, et al. Incidence and severity of transplant coronary artery disease early and up to 15 years after transplantation as detected by intravascular ultrasound. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995;25:171–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Johnson DE, Alderman EL, Schroeder JS, et al. Transplant coronary artery disease: histopathologic correlations with angiographic morphology. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1991;17:449–57.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Spes CH, Klauss V, Rieber J, et al. Functional and morphological findings in heart transplant recipients with a normal coronary angiogram: an analysis by dobutamine stress echocardiography, intracoronary Doppler and intravascular ultrasound. J Heart Lung Transplant. 1999;18:391–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. St Goar FG, Pinto FJ, Alderman EL, et al. Intracoronary ultrasound in cardiac transplant recipients. In vivo evidence of “angiographically silent” intimal thickening. Circulation. 1992;85:979–87.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Fang JC, Kinlay S, Wexberg P, et al. Use of the thrombolysis in myocardial infarction frame count for the quantitative assessment of transplant-associated arteriosclerosis. Am J Cardiol. 2000;86:890–2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Yeung AC, Davis SF, Hauptman PJ, et al. Incidence and progression of transplant coronary artery disease over 1 year: results of a multicenter trial with use of intravascular ultrasound. Multicenter Intravascular Ultrasound Transplant Study Group. J Heart Lung Transplant. 1995;14:S215–20.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Tsutsui H, Ziada KM, Schoenhagen P, et al. Lumen loss in transplant coronary artery disease is a biphasic process involving early intimal thickening and late constrictive remodeling: results from a 5-year serial intravascular ultrasound study. Circulation. 2001;104:653–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Li H, Tanaka K, Oeser B, Kobashigawa JA, Tobis JM. Vascular remodelling after cardiac transplantation: a 3-year serial intravascular ultrasound study. Eur Heart J. 2006;27:1671–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Lim TT, Liang DH, Botas J, Schroeder JS, Oesterle SN, Yeung AC. Role of compensatory enlargement and shrinkage in transplant coronary artery disease. Serial intravascular ultrasound study. Circulation. 1997;95:855–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Rickenbacher PR, Pinto FJ, Lewis NP, et al. Prognostic importance of intimal thickness as measured by intracoronary ultrasound after cardiac transplantation. Circulation. 1995;92:3445–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Tuzcu EM, Kapadia SR, Sachar R, et al. Intravascular ultrasound evidence of angiographically silent progression in coronary atherosclerosis predicts long-term morbidity and mortality after cardiac transplantation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;45:1538–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Mehra MR, Ventura HO, Stapleton DD, Smart FW, Collins TC, Ramee SR. Presence of severe intimal thickening by intravascular ultrasonography predicts cardiac events in cardiac allograft vasculopathy. J Heart Lung Transplant. 1995;14:632–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Kobashigawa JA, Tobis JM, Starling RC, et al. Multicenter intravascular ultrasound validation study among heart transplant recipients: outcomes after five years. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;45:1532–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Zakliczynski M, Swierad M, Zakliczynska H, Maruszewski M, Buszman P, Zembala M. Usefulness of Stanford scale of intimal hyperplasia assessed by intravascular ultrasound to predict time of onset and severity of cardiac allograft vasculopathy. Transplant Proc. 2005;37:1343–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Hernandez JM, de Prada JA, Burgos V, et al. Virtual histology intravascular ultrasound assessment of cardiac allograft vasculopathy from 1 to 20 years after heart transplantation. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2009;28:156–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Konig A, Kilian E, Sohn HY, et al. Assessment and characterization of time-related differences in plaque composition by intravascular ultrasound-derived radiofrequency analysis in heart transplant recipients. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2008;27:302–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Raichlin E, Bae JH, Kushwaha SS, et al. Inflammatory burden of cardiac allograft coronary atherosclerotic plaque is associated with early recurrent cellular rejection and predicts a higher risk of vasculopathy progression. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;53:1279–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Kapadia SR, Ziada KM, L’Allier PL, et al. Intravascular ultrasound imaging after cardiac transplantation: advantage of multi-vessel imaging. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2000;19:167–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Ramasubbu K, Schoenhagen P, Balghith MA, et al. Repeated intravascular ultrasound imaging in cardiac transplant recipients does not accelerate transplant coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;41:1739–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Keogh A, Richardson M, Ruygrok P, et al. Sirolimus in de novo heart transplant recipients reduces acute rejection and prevents coronary artery disease at 2 years: a randomized clinical trial. Circulation. 2004;110:2694–700.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Mancini D, Pinney S, Burkhoff D, et al. Use of rapamycin slows progression of cardiac transplantation vasculopathy. Circulation. 2003;108:48–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Kobashigawa JA, Tobis JM, Mentzer RM, et al. Mycophenolate mofetil reduces intimal thickness by intravascular ultrasound after heart transplant: reanalysis of the multicenter trial. Am J Transplant. 2006;6:993–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Kobashigawa JA, Moriguchi JD, Laks H, et al. Ten-year follow-up of a randomized trial of pravastatin in heart transplant patients. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2005;24:1736–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Kobashigawa JA, Katznelson S, Laks H, et al. Effect of pravastatin on outcomes after cardiac transplantation. N Engl J Med. 1995;333:621–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Schroeder JS, Gao SZ, Alderman EL, et al. A preliminary study of diltiazem in the prevention of coronary artery disease in heart-transplant recipients. N Engl J Med. 1993;328:164–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Mehra MR, Ventura HO, Smart FW, Collins TJ, Ramee SR, Stapleton DD. An intravascular ultrasound study of the influence of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and calcium entry blockers on the development of cardiac allograft vasculopathy. Am J Cardiol. 1995;75:853–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Bonaros NE, Kocher A, Dunkler D, et al. Comparison of combined prophylaxis of cytomegalovirus hyperimmune globulin plus ganciclovir versus cytomegalovirus hyperimmune globulin alone in high-risk heart transplant recipients. Transplantation. 2004;77:890–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Bader FM, Kfoury AG, Gilbert EM, et al. Percutaneous coronary interventions with stents in cardiac transplant recipients. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2006;25:298–301.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Halle 3rd AA, Disciascio G, Massin EK, et al. Coronary angioplasty, atherectomy and bypass surgery in cardiac transplant recipients. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995;26:120–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Musci M, Loebe M, Wellnhofer E, et al. Coronary angioplasty, bypass surgery, and retransplantation in cardiac transplant patients with graft coronary disease. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1998;46:268–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Boucek MM, Faro A, Novick RJ, Bennett LE, Keck BM, Hosenpud JD. The Registry of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation: Fourth Official Pediatric Report—2000. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2001;20:39–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. Murat Tuzcu MD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Aksoy, O., Tuzcu, E.M. (2014). Evaluation of Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy: From Angiography to Intravascular Ultrasound and Beyond. In: Nicholls, S., Crowe, T. (eds) Imaging Coronary Atherosclerosis. Contemporary Cardiology. Humana Press, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-0572-0_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-0572-0_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-0571-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-0572-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics