Abstract
The chapter starts with the question why humans universally spend a considerable amount of their time on the use and production of media and entertainment. In order to find a possible answer, a framework from evolutionary psychology is applied to media psychology. After a general definition of media psychology is provided, the new term evolutionary media psychology is coined and defined, followed by an outline of the methods evolutionary psychologists employ to generate and test specific hypotheses and predictions. Subsequently, the scientific paradigm of evolutionary psychology is discussed within the framework of Popperian and Lakatosian epistemology. Afterwards, important theories of evolutionary media psychology, including the discussion of entertainment as an evolutionary adaptation or a by-product, are presented. To further illustrate the epistemological foundations of evolutionary media psychology, selected studies examining sex-typical preferences in media selection, gossip aspects of new social media, and the seductive qualities of musical skills are described. Finally, the chapter closes by summarizing the described results within the framework of Lakatosian epistemology.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
As the doctoral thesis of De Backer (2005) is solely available in an online HTML version, it is not possible to cite the exact page. Thus, the respective chapter is cited.
- 2.
The SNS http://www.xing.com (a typical example of professional SNS) and http://www.wer-kennt-wen.de (a typical example of private SNS) were analyzed.
- 3.
Due to research heuristics, it was only focused on strategies of heterosexual individuals.
References
Alcock, J. (2005). Animal behavior: An evolutionary approach (8th ed.). Sunderland: Sinauer Associates.
ARD-ZDF-Onlinestudie. (2012). http://www.ard-zdf-onlinestudie.de/index.php?id=353. AccesseD 22 Jan 2013.
Asendorpf, J. (1996). Personality psychology. Basics, Psychologie der Persönlichkeit. Grundlagen. Berlin: Springer.
Astington, J. (1993). The child’s discovery of the mind. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Barkow, J. H., Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (1992). The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture. New York: Oxford University Press.
Bem, S. L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42(2), 155–162. doi:10.1037/h0036215.
Bischof, N. (1985). The puzzle of Oedipus, Das Rätsel Ödipus. München: Piper.
Bischof-Köhler, D. (2002). Different by nature, Von Natur aus anders. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.
Boyd, D. M., & Ellison, N. B. (2007). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 210–230. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00393.x.
Buller, D. J. (2005). Evolutionary psychology: The emperor’s new paradigm. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9(6), 277–283. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2005.04.003.
Buss, D. M. (1989). Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12(1), 1–49. doi:10.1017/S0140525X00023992.
Buss, D. M. (1995). Evolutionary psychology: A new paradigm for psychological science. Psychological Inquiry, 6(1), 1–30. doi:10.1207/s15327965pli0601_1.
Buss, D. M. (1999). Evolutionary psychology: The new science of the mind. Needham Heights: Allyn & Bacon.
Buss, D. M. (2001). Human nature and culture: An evolutionary psychological perspective. Journal of Personality, 69(6), 955–978. doi:10.1111/1467–6494.696171.
Buss, D. M. (2004). Evolutionary psychology: The new science of the mind (2nd ed.). Boston: Pearson.
Buss, D. M., & Barnes, M. (1986). Preferences in human mate selection. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(3), 559–570. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.50.3.559.
Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review, 100(2), 204–232. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.100.2.204.
Carolus, A. (2014). Gossip 2.0.—media communication in social network sites, Gossip 2.0.—Mediale Kommunikation in Sozialen Netzwerkseiten. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.
Confer, J. C., Easton, J. A., Fleischman, D. S., Goetz, C. D., Lewis, D. G., Perilloux, C., & Buss, D. M. (2010). Evolutionary psychology: Controversies, questions, prospects, and limitations. American Psychologist, 65(2), 110–126. doi:10.1037/a0018413.
Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (1992). Cognitive adaptations for social exchange. In J. H. Barkow, L. Cosmides, & J. Tooby (Eds.), The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture (pp. 163–228). New York: Oxford University Press.
Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (1994). Beyond intuition and instinct blindness: Toward an evolutionarily rigorous cognitive science. Cognition, 50(1–3), 41–77. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(94)90020-5.
Darwin, C. (1859). On the origin of species by means of natural selection: Or the preservation of the favoured races in the struggle for life. London: John Murray. doi:10.1037/14088-000.
Darwin, C. (1871). The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex (Vol. 1). London: John Murray. doi:10.1037/12293-000.
Dawkins, R. (1976). The selfish gene. New York: Oxford University Press.
Dawkins, R. (1982). The extended phenotype. San Francisco: Freeman.
Dawkins, R. (1999). The extended phenotype: The long reach of the gene. Revised edition. New York: Oxford University Press.
Dawkins, R. (2004). Extended phenotype—but not too extended. A reply to Laland, Turner and Jablonka. Biology and Philosophy, 19(3), 377–396. doi:10.1023/B:BIPH.0000036180.14904. 96.
De Backer, C. (2005). Like Belgian chocolate for the universal mind: Interpersonal and media gossip from an evolutionary perspective. http://www.ethesis.net/gossip/gossip_contence.htm. Accessed 16 Jan 2005.
Dennett, D. C. (1997). Darwin’s dangerous inheritance, Darwins gefährliches Erbe. Hamburg: Hoffmann und Campe.
Dennett, D. C. (2008). Intentional systems, Intentionale Systeme. In P. A. Bieri (Ed.), Analytical philosophy of the mind, Analytische Philosophie des Geistes. Weinheim: Beltz.
Dissanayake, E. (1992). Homo Aestheticus: Where art comes from and why. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
Dissanayake, E. (1988). What is art for? . Seattle: University of Washington Press.
Dissanayake, E. (1995). Homo aestheticus: Where art comes from and why. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
Dissanayake, E. (2000). Art and intimacy: How the arts began. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
Dunbar, R. (1998a). Grooming, gossip, and the evolution of language. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Dunbar, R. I. M. (1992). Neocortex size as a constraint on group size in primates. Journal of Human Evolution, 22(6), 469–493. doi:10.1016/0047-2484(92)90081-J.
Dunbar, R. I. M. (1998b). The social brain hypothesis. Evolutionary Anthropology, 6, 178–190. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1520–6505 (1998) 6:5 < 178::AID-EVAN5 > 3.0.CO;2–8.
Dunbar, R. M. (1993). Coevolution of neocortical size, group size and language in humans. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 16(4), 681–735. doi:10.1017/S0140525X00032325.
Dunbar, R. M. (2004). Gossip in evolutionary perspective. Review of General Psychology, 8(2), 100–110. doi:10.1037/1089-2680.8.2.100.
Eagly, A. H., Wood, W., & Diekman, A. B. (2000). Social role theory of sex differences and similarities: A current appraisal. In T. Eckes & H. M. Trautner (Eds.), The developmental social psychology of gender (pp. 123–174). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Fitch, W., Hauser, M. D., & Chomsky, N. (2005). The evolution of the language faculty: Clarifications and implications. Cognition, 97(2), 179–210. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2005.02.005.
Fodor, J. (2005). Reply to Steven Pinker ‘So how does the mind work?’. Mind & Language, 20(1), 25–32. doi:10.1111/j.0268-1064.2005.00275.x.
Foster, E. K. (2004). Research on gossip: Taxonomy, methods, and future directions. Review of General Psychology, 8(2), 78–99. doi:10.1037/1089-2680.8.2.78.
Früh, W. (2002). Entertainment through television. A molar theory, Unterhaltung durch das Fernsehen. Eine molare Theorie. Konstanz: UVK.
Furnham, A., Swami, V., & Shah, K. (2006). Body weight, waist-to-hip ratio and breast size correlates of ratings of attractiveness and health. Personality and Individual Differences, 41(3), 443–454. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2006.02.007.
Gangestad, S. W., & Simpson, J. A. (2000). The evolution of human mating: Trade-offs and strategic pluralism. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23(4), 573–644. doi:10.1017/S0140525 X0000337X.
Gigerenzer, G., & Selten, R. (2001). Bounded rationality: The adaptive toolbox. Cambridge: MIT.
Grammer, K., Fink, B., Møller, A. P., & Thornhill, R. (2003). Darwinian aesthetics: Sexual selection and the biology of beauty. Biological Reviews, 78(3), 385–407. doi:10.1017/S146479 3102006085.
Greiling, H., & Buss, D. M. (2000). Women’s sexual strategies: The hidden dimension of extra-pair mating. Personality and Individual Differences, 28(5), 929–963. doi:10.1016/S0191-8869(99)00151-8.
Hagen, E. H. (2005). Controversial issues in evolutionary psychology. In D. M. Buss (Ed.), The handbook of evolutionary psychology (pp. 145–173). Hoboken: Wiley.
Hamilton, W.D. (1964). The genetical evolution of social behavior. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 7(1), 17–52. doi:10.1016/0022-5193(64)90039-6.
Holcomb, H. (1998). Testing evolutionary hypotheses. In C. B. Crawford & D. L. Krebs (Eds.), Handbook of evolutionary psychology: Ideas, issues, and applications (pp. 303–334). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Horton, D., & Wohl, R. (1956). Mass communication and para-social interaction. Psychiatry: Journal for the Study of Interpersonal Processes, 19, 215–229.
Ketelaar, T., & Ellis, B. J. (2000). Are evolutionary explanations unfalsifiable? Evolutionary psychology and the Lakatosian philosophy of science. Psychological Inquiry, 11(1), 1–21. doi:10.1207/S15327965PLI1101_01.
Lakatos, I. (1970). Falsifications and the methodology of scientific research programmes. In I. Lakatos & A. Musgrave (Eds.), Criticism and the growth of knowledge (pp. 91–196). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lakatos, I. (1978). The methodology of scientific research programs: Philosophical papers (Vol. 1). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lewontin, R. C. (1990). The evolution of cognition. In D. N. Osherson & E. E. Smith (Eds.), Thinking: An invitation to cognitive science (Vol. 3, pp. 229–246). Cambridge: MIT
Lewontin, R. C. (1998). The evolution of cognition: Questions we will never answer. In D. Scarborough & S. Sternberg (Eds.), Methods, models, and conceptual issues: An invitation to cognitive science (Vol. 4, pp. 106–132). Cambridge: MIT.
Manning, J. T. (2002). Digit ratio: A pointer to fertility, behavior and health. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.
Mealey, L. (2000). Sex differences. Developmental and evolutionary strategies. San Diego: Academic Press.
Miller, G. (2000). The mating mind: How sexual choice shaped the evolution of human nature. New York: Doubleday.
Miller, G. F. (1998). Sexual selection for cultural displays. In R. Dunbar, C. Knight, & C. Power (Eds.), The evolution of culture. Edinburgh: University Press.
Newell A. (1973). You can’t play 20 questions with nature and win: Projective comments on the papers in this symposion. In W. G. Chase (Ed.), Visual informactino processing (pp. 283–308). New Yord: Academic.
Ohler, P. (2001). Play, evolution, cognition. From the origins of play to the computer games, Spiel, Evolution, Kognition. Von den Ursprüngen des Spiels bis zu den Computerspielen. Bad Heilbrunn: Julius Klinkhardt.
Ohler, P., & Nieding, G. (2006). An evolutionary perspective on entertainment. In J. Bryant & P. Vorderer (Eds.), Psychology of entertainment (pp. 423–433). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Penke, L., & Asendorpf, J. B. (2008). Beyond global sociosexual orientations: A more differentiated look at sociosexuality and its effects on courtship and romantic relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(5), 1113–1135. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.95.5.1113.
Pillsworth, E. G., & Haselton, M. G. (2006a). Male sexual attractiveness predicts differential ovulatory shifts in female extra-pair attraction and male mate retention. Evolution and Human Behavior, 27(4), 247–258. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2005.10.002.
Pillsworth, E. G., & Haselton, M. G. (2006b). Women’s sexual strategies: The evolution of long-term bonds and extrapair sex. Annual Review of Sex Research, 17(1), 59–100. doi:10.1080/10532528.2006.10559837.
Pinker, S. (1997). How the mind works. New York: W Norton.
Popper, K. R. (1959). The logic of scientific discovery. Oxford: Basic Books.
Reeves, B., & Nass, C. (1996). The media equation: How people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places. Chicago: Center for the Study of Language and Information.
Regan, P. C. (1998). What if you can’t get what you want? Willingness to compromise ideal mate selection standards as a function of sex, mate value, and relationship context. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24(12), 1294–1303. doi:10.1177/01461672982412004.
Reinisch, J. M. (1981). Prenatal exposure to synthetic progestins increases potential for aggression in humans. Science, 211(4487), 1171–1173. doi:10.1126/science.7466388.
Rosnow, R. L. (1977). Gossip and marketplace psychology. Journal of Communication, 27(1), 158–163. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1977.tb01811.x.
Schlinger, H. D. (2002). Not so fast, Mr. Pinker: A behaviorist looks at the Blank Slate. A review of Steven Pinker’s the Blank Slate: The modern denial of human nature. Behavior and Social Issues, 12(1), 75–79.
Schmitt, D. P. (2005). Fundamentals of human mating strategies. In D. M. Buss (Ed.), The handbook of evolutionary psychology (pp. 258–291). Hoboken: Wiley.
Schmitt, D. P., & Buss, D. M. (2000). Sexual dimensions of person description: Beyond or subsumed by the Big Five? Journal of Research in Personality, 34(2), 141–177. doi:10.1006/jrpe.1999.2267.
Schramm, H. (2008). Parasocial interaction, Parasoziale Interaktion. In N. C. Krämer, S. Schwan, D. Unz, & M. Suckfüll (Eds.), Media psychology: Key terms and concepts, Medienpsychologie: Schlüsselbegriffe und Konzepte (pp. 253–258). Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.
Schreier, M., & Appel, M. (2002) The distinction between reality and fiction as an aspect of a critical-constructive media-use-competence, ‘Realitäts-Fiktions-Unterscheidungen als Aspekt einer kritisch-konstruktiven Mediennutzungskompetenz’. In N. Groeben & B. Hurrelmann (Eds.), Media competency. Preconditions, dimensions, functions, Medienkompetenz. Voraussetzungen, Dimensionen, Funktionen (pp. 33–56). Weinheim: Juventa.
Schwab, F. (2004) Evolution and emotion: Evolutionary perspectives in emotion research and applied psychology, Evolution und Emotion: evolutionäre Perspektiven in der Emotionsforschung und der angewandten Psychologie. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.
Schwab, F. (2006). Are we amusing ourselves to death? Answers from evolutionary psychology. SPIEL. Siegener Periodikum zur internationalen empirischen Literaturwissenschaft, 22(2), 329–338.
Schwab, F. (2008). Evolutionary explanations, Evolutionäre Erklärungsansätze. In N. C. Krämer, S. Schwan, D. Unz, & M. Suckfüll (Eds.), Media psychology: Key terms and concepts, Medienpsychologie: Schlüsselbegriffe und Konzepte (pp. 41–46). Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.
Schwab, F. (2010a). Moving pictures: An evolutionary media pychology of entertainment, Lichtspiele: Eine evolutionäre Medienpsychologie der Unterhaltung. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.
Schwab, F. (2010b). Darwin as vision aids for psychologists—evolutionary psychology, Darwin als Sehhilfe für die Psychologen—Evolutionspsychologie. In J. Oehler (Ed.), The human being—evolution, nature, and culture: Contributions to our prevailing understanding of human beings, Der Mensch—Evolution, Natur und Kultur: Beiträge zu unserem heutigen (pp. 75–98). Berlin: Springer.
Schwab, F., & Bordin, I. (2009). “Money for nothing and chicks for free”—A Darwinian perspective on entertainment behavior. Proceedings of the 6th Conference of the Media Psychology Division of the German Psychological Society, 9–11 September. Duisburg.
Schwab, F., & Schwender, C. (2010). The decent of emotions in media: Darwinian perspectives. In K. Doveling, C. V. Scheve, & E. A. Konijn (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of emotion and mass media (pp. 15–36). New York: Routledge.
Schwender, C. (2006) Media and emotions. Evolutionary psychological components of a mediatheory, Medien und Emotione. Evolutionspsychologische Bausteine einer Medientheorie (2nd ed.). Wiesbaden: DUV.
Sherry, J. L. (2004). Media effects theory and the nature/nurture debate: A historical overview and directions for future research. Media Psychology, 6(1), 83–109. doi:10.1207/s1532785 xmep0601_4.
Silvers, S. (2010). Methodological and moral muddles in evolutionary psychology. Journal of Mind and Behavior, 31(1–2), 65–84.
Stern, D. N. (2002). The first relationship: Infant and mother. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Tinbergen, N. (1963). On the aims and methods of ethology. Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie, 20(4), 410–433. doi:10.1111/j.1439-0310.1963.tb01161.x.
Tomasello, M., & Call, J. (1997). Primate cognition. New York: Oxford University Press.
Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (1992). The psychological foundations of culture. In J. H. Barkow, L. Cosmides, & J. Tooby (Eds.), The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture (pp. 19–136). New York: Oxford University Press.
Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (2001). Does beauty build adapted minds? Toward an evolutionary theory of aesthetics, fiction and the arts. SubStance, 30(94–95), 6–27. doi:10.2307/3685502.
Trafimow, D., & Gambacorta, D. (2012). How obvious are hypotheses in evolutionary psychology?. The Journal of Social, Evolutionary, and Cultural Psychology, 6(1), 1–12.
Trivers, R. L. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In B. Campbell (Ed.), Sexual selection and the descent of man: 1871–1971 (pp. 136–179). Chicago: Aldine.
Turner, M., Mazur, M. A., Wendel, N., & Winslow, R. (2003). Relational ruin or social glue? The joint effect of relationship type and gossip valence on liking, trust, and expertise. Communication Monographs, 70(2), 129–141. doi:10.1080/0363775032000133782.
Voracek, M., & Loibl, L. M. (2009). Scientometric analysis and bibliography of digit ratio (2D:4D) research. Psychological Reports, 104(3), 922–956. doi:10.2466/pr0.104.3.922-956.
Winterhoff-Spurk, P. (2004). Media psychology. An introduction, Medienpsychologie. Eine Einführung (2nd ed.) Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.
Workman, L., & Reader, W. (2008). Evolutionary psychology: An introduction (2nd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hennighausen, C., Schwab, F. (2015). Evolutionary Media Psychology and Its Epistemological Foundation. In: Breyer, T. (eds) Epistemological Dimensions of Evolutionary Psychology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-1387-9_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-1387-9_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-1386-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-1387-9
eBook Packages: Behavioral ScienceBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)