Skip to main content

Clinical Scenario: Microscopic Hematuria and Atypical Cytology

68-Year-old man with asymptomatic microscopic hematuria, significant tobacco history, negative upper tract imaging, and persistently atypical and suspicious cytology

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Management of Bladder Cancer

Abstract

A 68-year-old man who was a former cigarette smoker was found to have atypical/suspicious cells on urinary cytology obtained during a work up for microscopic hematuria. Imaging (presumably a CT urogram) and cystoscopy did not identify an obvious tumor. He has three risk factors for urothelial cancer (UC): male, smoking history, and hematuria. The absence of a cytology that indicates “positive for cancer cells” is most important. Close follow-up by repeat cytology and possibly cystoscopy is reasonable but we would not proceed with bladder or prostatic urethra biopsies, upper tract cytology, ureteroscopy, or submitting the urine for the FISH analysis unless cells consistent with cancer are identified by an experienced cytopathologist. Such investigative procedures for an atypical report would, in our view, subject the patient to potential morbidity with a low likelihood of identifying a UC.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Britton JP. Effectiveness of haematuria clinics. Br J Urol. 1993;71(3):247–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Benbassat J, Gergawi M, Offringa M, Drukker A. Symptomless microhaematuria in schoolchildren: causes for variable management strategies. QJM. 1996;89:845–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Loo RK, Lieberman SF, Slezak JM, et al. Stratifying risk of urinary tract malignant tumors in patients with asymptomatic microscopic hematuria. Mayo Clin Proc. 2013;88:129–38.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Parkin DM. The global burden of urinary bladder cancer. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 2008;42:12–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Nieder AM, John S, Messina CR, et al. Are patients aware of the association between smoking and bladder cancer? J Urol. 2006;176:2405–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Diagnosis, evaluation and follow-up of asymptomatic microhematuria (AMH) in adults: AUA Guideline. 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Takahashi N, Glockner JF, Hartman RP, et al. Gadolinium enhanced magnetic resonance urography for upper urinary tract malignancy. J Urol. 2010;183:1330–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Datta SN, Allen GM, Evans R, et al. Urinary tract ultrasonography in the evaluation of hematuria-areort of over 1000 cases. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2002;84:203–5.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Edwards TJ, Dickinson AJ, Natale S, et al. A prospective analysis of the diagnostic yield resulting from the attendance of 4020 patients at a protocol-driven haematuria clinic. BJU. 2006;97:301–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chlapoutakis K, Theocharopoulos N, Yarmentitis S, et al. Performance of computed tomographic urography in diagnosis of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma, in patients presenting with hematuria: systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Radiol. 2010;73:334–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Papanicolaou GN. Cytology of the urine sediment in neoplasms of the urinary tract. J Urol. 1947;57: 375–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Owens CL, Vandenbussche CJ, Burroughs FH, Rosenthal DL. A review of reporting systems and terminology for urine cytology. Cancer Cytopathol. 2013;121:9–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Muus Ubago J, Mehta V, Wojcik EM, Barkan GA. Evaluation of atypical urine cytology progression to malignancy. Cancer Cytopathol. 2013;121:387–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Renshaw AA. Subclassifying atypical urinary cytology specimens. Cancer. 2000;90:222–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Brimo F, Vollmer RT, Case B, Aprikian A, Kassouf W, Auger M. Accuracy of urine cytology and the significance of an atypical category. Am J Clin Pathol. 2009;132:785–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Layfield LJ, Elsheikh TM, Fili A, Nayar R, Shidham V. Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology. Review of the state of the art and recommendations of the Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology for urinary cytology procedures and reporting : the Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology Practice Guidelines Task Force. Diagn Cytopathol. 2004;30:24–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Murphy WM, Soloway MS, Jukkola AF, Crabtree WN, Ford KS. Urinary cytology and bladder cancer. The cellular features of transitional cell neoplasms. Cancer. 1984;53:1555–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kapur U, Venkataraman G, Wojcik EM. Diagnostic significance of “atypia” in instrumented versus voided urine specimens. Cancer. 2008;114:270–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Nabi G, Greene D, Donnel MO. Suspicious urinary cytology with negative evaluation for malignancy in the diagnostic investigation of haematuria: how to follow up? J Clin Pathol. 2004;57:365–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Stenberg I, Rona R, Olsfanger S, Lew S, Leibovitch I. The clinical significance of class III (suspicious) urine cytology. Cytopathol Off J Br Soc Clin Cytol. 2011;329–33.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Lokeshwar VB, Habuchi T, Grossman HB, et al. Bladder tumor markers beyond cytology: International consensus panel on bladder tumor markers. Urology. 2005;66:35–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Planz B, Jochims E, Deix T, et al. The role of urinary cytology for detection of bladder cancer. EJSO. 2005;31:304–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Raab SS, Grzybicki DM, Brbin CM, et al. Urine cytology discrepancies—frequency, causes and outcomes. Am J Clin Pathol. 2007;127:946–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Piaton E, Advenier AS, Benaïm G, et al. A typical urothelial cells (AUC): a Bethesda-derived wording applicable to urinary cytopathology. Ann Pathol. 2011;31(1):11–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Sarosdy MF, Kahn PR, Ziffer MD, Love WR, Barkin J, Abara EO, et al. Use of a multitarget fluorescence in situ hybridization assay to diagnose bladder cancer in patients with hematuria. J Urol. 2006;176:44–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Halling KC, King W, Sokolova IA, Meyer RG, Burkhardt HM, Halling AC, et al. A comparison of cytology and fluorescence in situ hybridization for the detection of urothelial carcinoma. J Urol. 2000;164:1768–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Nieder AM, Soloway MS, Herr HW. Should we abandon the FISH test? Eur Urol. 2007;51:1469–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Tomasini JM, Konety BR. Urinary markers/cytology: what and when should a urologist use. Urol Clin North Am. 2013;40:165–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Tapia C, Glatz K, Obermann EC, Grilli B, Barascud A, Herzog M, et al. Evaluation of chromosomal aberrations in patients with benign conditions and reactive changes in urinary cytology. Cancer Cytopathol. 2011;119:404–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Dimashkieh H, Wolff DJ, Smith TM, Houser PM, Nietert PJ, Yang J. Evaluation of urovysion and cytology for bladder cancer detection: a study of 1835 paired urine samples with clinical and histologic correlation. Cancer Cytopathol. 2013;121:591–7.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Sadek S, Soloway MS, Hook S, Civantos F. The value of upper tract cytology after transurethral resection of bladder tumor in patients with bladder transitional cell cancer. J Urol. 1999;161:77–9. discussion 79–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mark S. Soloway M.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gomez, C.S., Soloway, M.S., Caso, J.R., Rojas, C.P., Jorda, M. (2015). Clinical Scenario: Microscopic Hematuria and Atypical Cytology. In: Konety, B., Chang, S. (eds) Management of Bladder Cancer. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-1881-2_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-1881-2_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-1880-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-1881-2

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics