Abstract
Advances in technology have greatly influenced the practice of surgery in multiple ways. Not only is the surgeon of today patient-centered, academically oriented, disease-based, and highly specialized, but the entire spectrum of surgical care now is more technology-driven than ever before. While these facets of surgery are not totally new, the environment on which the surgeon is operating is rapidly changing for the better. Today’s surgeon incorporates genomics, nanotechnology tools, robots, and cameras to provide care and has much greater knowledge of the biology of disease than in the past. This has resulted in a substantial metamorphosis of the surgeon. While the surgical foundation is fundamentally the same, the modus operandi of the practice of surgery has changed substantially. Today’s surgeon is working in a collaborative environment that is heavily influenced by the financial bottom line, multiple layers of bureaucracy and administration, insurance companies, and continuing changing public policies and perceptions pertaining to health. Regardless of the many outside influences, surgeons continue to strive to maintain the basic principles of caring, teaching, mentoring, and advancing the art and science of the surgical discipline above everything else. The transformation in health care and surgical practice has not changed the basic tenets: surgeons care for the sick and injured, surgeons are healers, surgeons strive for perfection, but surgeons respect the rich surgical past and contributions of our teachers. However, in order to be prepared proficiently for the future, surgeons must constantly strive to understand and master the magnitude and complexities of the new body of knowledge, technology, and teamwork essential to optimal health care today. And finally, the training of the new surgeons needs to be addressed. The new surgeons that we are educating must above all be adaptable because we can expect technology to come in successive waves to challenge our prejudice and demand the best in critical understanding of the changing options for patient care. In this chapter, we discuss some of the elements that we believe are paramount in changing “the old surgeon” to “the new surgeon”: one who can navigate nanotechnology and surgical science, yet maintain the skills of comforting a dying patient, as well as working effectively under exceptionally stressful situations such as war, other disasters, and a myriad variety of other emergencies.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Rickert J. Patient centered care: what it means and how to get there. Health Affairs Blog. http://healthaffairs.org/blog/2012/01/24/patient-centered-care-what-it-means-and-how-to-get-there/ Accessed 19 Nov 2014.
Sosin M, Patel KM, Nahabedian MY, Bhanot P. Patient-centered outcomes following laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: a systematic review of the current literature. Am J Surg. 2014;208:677–84.
Liang MK, Clapp M, Li LT, Berger RL, Hicks SC, Awad S. Patient satisfaction, chronic pain, and functional status following laparoscopic ventral hernia repair. World J Surg. 2013;37(3):530–7.
Durham RM, Zuckerman D, Wolverson M, Heiberg E, Luchtefeld WB, Herr DJ, Shapiro MJ, Mazuski JE, Salimi Z, Sundaram M. Computed tomography as a screening exam in patients with suspected blunt aortic injury. Ann Surg. 1994;220(5):699–704.
Brooks AP, Olson LK, Shackford SR. Computed tomography in the diagnosis of traumatic rupture of the thoracic aorta. Clin Radiol. 1989;40:133–8.
Moore FD. Metabolic care of the surgical patient. Philadelphia and London: W. B. Saunders Co; 1959.
Dudrick SJ, Wilmore DW, Vars HM, Rhoads JE. Long-term total parenteral nutrition with growth, development, and positive nitrogen balance. Surgery. 1968;64:134.
Lerner BH. The breast cancer wars. Fear, hope, and pursuit of a cure in 20th century America. New York: Oxford University Press; 2001.
Hermann RE. Three unforgettable surgeons. Surgery. 2004;135:1114–7.
Saxon W. Dr. George Crile Jr, 84, Foe of unneeded surgery dies. New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/1992/09/12/us/dr-george-crile-jr-84-foe-of-unneeded-surgery-dies.html. Accessed 19 Nov 2014.
Reynolds Jr W. The first laparoscopic cholecystectomy. JSLS. 2001;5(1):89–94.
Iribarne A, Milner R, Merlo AE, Singh A, Saunders CR, Russo MJ. Outcomes following emergent open repair for thoracic aortic dissection are improved at higher volume centers. J Card Surg. 2015;30(1):74–9.
Cameron JL, Riall TS, Coleman J, Belcher KA. One thousand consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies. Ann Surg. 2006;244(1):10–5.
Winter JM, Cameron JL, Campbell KA, Arnold MA, Chang DC, Coleman J, Hodgin MB, Sauter PK, Hruban RH, Riall TS, Schulick RD, Choti MA, Lillemoe KD, Yeo CJ. 1423 pancreaticoduodenectomies for pancreatic cancer: a single-institution experience. J Gastrointest Surg. 2006;10(9):1199–210. discussion 1210-1.
Freischlag JA, Kibbe MR. The evolution of surgery: the story of “Two Poems”. JAMA. 2014;312(17):1737–8.
Pruitt Jr BA. Combat casualty care and surgical progress. Ann Surg. 2006;243(6):715–29.
Blackbourne LH, Baer DG, Eastridge BJ, Kheirabadi B, Bagley S, Kragh Jr JF, Cap AP, Dubick MA, Morrison JJ, Midwinter MJ, Butler FK, Kotwal RS, Holcomb JB. Military medical revolution: prehospital combat casualty care. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012;73(6 Suppl 5):S372–7.
Ingalls N, Zonies D, Bailey JA, Martin KD, Iddins BO, Carlton PK, Hanseman D, Branson R, Dorlac W, Johannigman J. A review of the first 10 years of critical care aeromedical transport during operation Iraqi freedom and operation enduring freedom: the importance of evacuation timing. JAMA Surg. 2014;149(8):807–13.
Palm K, Apodaca A, Spencer D, Costanzo G, Bailey J, Blackbourne LH, Spott MA, Eastridge BJ. Evaluation of military trauma system practices related to damage-control resuscitation. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012;73(6 Suppl 5):S459–64.
Shanafelt TD, Balch CM, Dyrbye L, Bechamps G, Russell T, Satele D, Rummans T, Swartz K, Novotny PJ, Sloan J, Oreskovich MR. Special report. Suicidal ideation among American surgeons. Arch Surg. 2011;146(1):54–62.
Bittner 4th JG, Khan Z, Babu M, Hamed O. Stress, burnout, and maladaptive coping: strategies for surgeon well-being. Bull Am Coll Surg. 2011;96(8):17–22.
Balch CM, Freischlag JA, Shanafelt TD. Stress and burnout among surgeons: understanding and managing the syndrome and avoiding the adverse consequences. Arch Surg. 2009;144(4):371–6.
Balch CM, Shanafelt T. Combating stress and burnout in surgical practice: a review. Adv Surg. 2010;44:29–47. Review.
Shanafelt TD, Oreskovich MR, Dyrbye LN, Satele DV, Hanks JB, Sloan JA, Balch CM. Avoiding burnout: the personal health habits and wellness practices of US surgeons. Ann Surg. 2012;255(4):625–33.
Sakran JV, Kaafarani H, Mouawad NJ, Santry HP. When things go wrong. ACS Bull. 2011;96(8):13–6.
Luu S, Leung SO, Moulton CA. When bad things happen to good surgeons: reactions to adverse events. Surg Clin North Am. 2012;92(1):153–61.
Wu A. Medical error: the second victim. the doctor who makes the mistake needs help too. BMJ. 2000;320:726–7.
Wallace JE, Lemaire JB, Ghali WA. Physician wellness: a missing quality indicator. Lancet. 2009;374(9702):1714–21.
Look FD. Leadership and medicine. Gulf Breeze, FL: Fire Starter Publishing; 2009.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Latifi, R., Dudrick, S.J., Merrell, R.C. (2015). The New Surgeon: Patient-Centered, Disease-Focused, Technology-Driven, and Team-Oriented. In: Latifi, R., Rhee, P., Gruessner, R. (eds) Technological Advances in Surgery, Trauma and Critical Care. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2671-8_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2671-8_1
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-2670-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-2671-8
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)