Skip to main content

Communities of Anxiety: Gathering and Dwelling at Causewayed Enclosures in the British Neolithic

  • Chapter
The Archaeology of Anxiety

Abstract

As Martin Heidegger argued, anxiety is a vital element of Being-in-the-world. This recognition challenges us as archaeologists to incorporate emotions like anxiety into our accounts. Yet this has to be done in ways that do not create an essentialist account of the past. In this paper I seek to consider how we can do this by considering anxiety as a crucial element of the affective fields that textured the people, things and places of Early Neolithic Britain. By working at differing scales from the complex histories of the early fourth millennium BC to the practices at specific monuments, I argue that anxiety was a crucial element both of people’s lives and of the historical processes that produced communities and drove change in this period.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Dasein is the term Heidegger (1962) uses in place of human, person, mind or body. He does so to capture the always-already-contextualised nature of Being-in-the-world. There is no existential category of Dasein, separate from the world, which can be discussed apart from the world. Rather Dasein is always part of the world, always thrown into its own history.

  2. 2.

    Of course this division between the social, material and embodied nature of emotions is entirely heuristic. People have social relations with things and material relations with one another, and all of this is embodied. Indeed I mean to imply no categorical distinction between how people relate to each other and to the world in the terms ‘social’ and ‘material’ (cf. Webmoor & Witmore, 2008).

  3. 3.

    The kinds of community I am discussing here forms a scale of analysis between the affective fields instantiated in particular circumstances and the broader emotional communities defined by Rosenwein (2006).

  4. 4.

    The understanding of this transition has somewhat been polarised between people who see it as solely the product of farmers arriving from the continent (e.g. Sheridan, 2010) and others who prefer to see it as the outcome of local hunter gatherers taking up a new lifestyle (e.g. Thomas, 2008). As is often the case, such oppositions do much to suppress the complexity of these processes in the past, and narratives involving both continental farmers and local people playing a key role are more convincing (Cummings & Harris, 2011; Whittle et al., 2011).

  5. 5.

    This is not the place to conduct a detailed review of how Bayesian modelling works (but see Bayliss & Whittle, 2007; Whittle et al., 2011, chapter 2). Suffice it to say it involves the combination of prior knowledge (e.g. of stratigraphic sequence) with computer modelling to combat the scatter inherent in radiocarbon dates. Explicitly interpretive, the models proposed by Whittle et al. (2011) will be challenged or refined over the coming years. In this paper, however, this is not my aim. Rather I have adopted their chronology as the best available in order to develop the historical account I wish to offer. As a result I will not attempt to justify all the dates quoted here, and the reader who wishes to interrogate them should turn to the various references.

  6. 6.

    This remains a very superficial summary of the complex chronology proposed by Whittle et al. (2011); readers are encouraged once more to examine this source for a fuller picture.

  7. 7.

    For the sake of clarity and brevity, I shall gloss over the other forms of monuments constructed in the first half of the fourth millennium cal BC, though these obviously have their role to play as well in the narratives that follow.

  8. 8.

    In commenting on this article Alasdair Whittle pointed out that the choices people had to make around food management in this period was something that processual scholars (e.g. Bogucki, 1988; Halstead, 1996) had tackled much more seriously than their post-processual counterparts. He is undoubtedly right that there would be much to gain from rethinking risk and reward at the beginning of farming from a perspective rooted in the archaeology of anxiety and emotion.

  9. 9.

    See Harris (2011) for further discussion of these spectacular deposits.

  10. 10.

    The cattle humerus, unlike its human counterpart, is still a leg bone of course (Harris, 2011).

Bibliography

  • Ahmed, S. (2004). The cultural politics of emotion. Edinburgh, Scotland: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, B. (1991). Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. London, England: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Appadurai, A. (1986). Introduction: Commodities and the politics of value. In A. Appadurai (Ed.), The social life of things: Commodities in cultural perspective (pp. 3–63). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Averill, J. R. (1980). Emotion and anxiety: Sociocultural, biological and psychological determinants. In A. O’Rorty (Ed.), Explaining emotions (pp. 37–72). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, J. C. (2000). Fields of discourse: Reconstituting a social archaeology. In J. Thomas (Ed.), Interpretative archaeology: A reader (pp. 23–32). London, England: Leicester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayliss, A., & Whittle, A. (eds.). (2007). Histories of the dead: building chronologies for five southern British long barrows. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 17(S1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bogaard, A., & Jones, G. (2007). Neolithic farming in Britain and central Europe: Contrast or continuity. In A. Whittle & V. Cummings (Eds.), Going over: The Mesolithic-Neolithic transition in north-west Europe (pp. 357–375). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bogucki, P. (1988). Forest farmers and stockherders. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, R., & Edmonds, M. (1993). Interpreting the axe trade: Production and exchange in Neolithic Britain. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, J. (1993). Bodies that matter: On the discursive limits of ‘sex’. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cleal, R. (2004). The dating and diversity of the earliest ceramics of Wessex and southwest England. In R. Cleal & J. Pollard (Eds.), Monuments and material culture: Papers in honour of an avebury archaeologist: Isobel Smith (pp. 164–192). Salisbury, England: Hobnob Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collard, M., Edinborough, K., Shennan, S., & Thomas, M. G. (2010). Radiocarbon evidence indicates that migrants introduced farming to Britain. Journal of Archaeological Science, 37, 866–870.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cummings, V., & Harris, O. J. T. (2011). Animals, people and places: The continuity of hunting and gathering practices across the Mesolithic-Neolithic transition in Britain. European Journal of Archaeology, 14(3), 361–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, P. (1988) The Neolithic settlements on Crickley Hill. In C. Burgess, P. Topping, C. Mordant & M. Maddison (Eds.), Enclosures and defences in the Neolithic of Wester Europe (pp. 75–87). Oxford: British Archaeological Reports.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edmonds, M. (1993). Interpreting causewayed enclosures in the past and present. In C. Y. Tilley (Ed.), Interpretative archaeology (pp. 99–142). London, England: Berg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairbairn, A. S. (2000). On the spread of plant crops across Neolithic Britain with special reference to southern England. In A. S. Fairbairn (Ed.), Plants in neolithic Britain and beyond (pp. 107–121). Oxford, England: Oxbow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowler, C. (2010). Pattern and diversity in the Early Neolithic mortuary practice of Britain and Ireland: Contextualising the treatment of the dead. Documenta Praehistorica, 37, 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gosden, C. (2004). Aesthetics, intelligence and emotions: Implications for archaeology. In E. DeMarrais, C. Gosden, & C. Renfrew (Eds.), Rethinking materiality: The engagement of mind with the material world (pp. 33–40). Oxford, England: McDonald Institute for Archaeology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, H. S. (1980). The flint arrowheads of the British Isles. Oxford, England: British Archaeological Reports.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halstead, P. (1996). The development of agriculture and pastoralism in Greece: When, how, who and what? In D. Harris (Ed.), The origins and spread of agriculture and pastoralism in Eurasia (pp. 296–309). London, England: UCL Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harré, R., & Finlay-Jones, R. (1986). Emotion talk across times. In R. Harré (Ed.), The social construction of emotions (pp. 220–233). Oxford, England: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, O. J. T. (2005). Agents of identity: Performative practice at the Etton causewayed enclosure. In D. Hofmann, J. Mills, & A. Cochrane (Eds.), Elements of being: Identities, mentalities and movements (pp. 40–49). Oxford, England: British Archaeological Reports.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, O. J. T. (2006). Identity, memory and emotion in Neolithic Dorset, Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, School of History and Archaeology, Cardiff University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, O. J. T. (2009). Making places matter in Early Neolithic Dorset. Oxford Journal of Archaeology, 28(2), 111–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, O. J. T. (2010). Emotional and mnemonic geographies at Hambledon Hill: Texturing Neolithic places with bodies and bones. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 20, 357–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, O. J. T. (2011). Constituting childhood: Identity, conviviality and community at Windmill Hill. In M. Lally & A. Moore (Eds.), (Re)thinking the little ancestor: New perspectives on the archaeology of infancy and childhood (pp. 122–132). Oxford, England: British Archaeological Reports.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, O. J. T. (2013). Relational communities in prehistoric Britain. In C. Watts (Ed.), Relational archaeologies: Humans, animals, things (pp. 173–189). London, England: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, O. J. T. (2014). (Re)assembling communities. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 21(1), 76–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, O. J. T., & Robb, J. E. (2012). Multiple ontologies and the problem of the body in history. American Anthropologist, 114(4), 668–679.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, O. J. T., & Sørensen, T. F. (2010). Rethinking emotion and material culture. Archaeological Dialogues, 17, 145–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Healy, F., Bayliss, A., Whittle, A., Allen, M. J., Mercer, R., Rawlings, M., et al. (2011). South Wessex. In A. Whittle, F. Healy, & A. Bayliss (Eds.), Gathering time: Dating the Early Neolithic enclosures of southern Britain and Ireland (pp. 111–206). Oxford, England: Oxbow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M. (1962). Being and time. Oxford, England: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Konvalinka, I., Xygalatas, D., Bulbulia, J., Schjødt, U., Jegindø, E.-M., Wallot, S., et al. (2011). Synchronized arousal between performers and related spectator in a fire-walking ritual. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(20), 8514–8519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kristeva, J. (1982). Powers of horror: An essay on abjection. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kus, S. (2010). The matter with emotions. Archaeological Dialogues, 17(3), 167–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lupton, D. (1998). The emotional self. London, England: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lutz, C. A. (1998). Unnatural emotions: Everyday emotions on a Micronesian atoll and their challenge to western theory. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maschio, T. (1998). The narrative and counter-narrative of the gift: emotional dimensions of ceremonial exchange in southwestern New Britain. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 4, 83–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKinley, J. (2008). Human remains. In R. Mercer & F. Healy (Eds.), Hambledon Hill, Dorset, England. Excavations and Survey of a Neolithic Monument Complex and its Surrounding Landscape (pp. 477–535). London, England: English Heritage Archaeological Reports.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mercer, R., & Healy, F. (2008). Hambledon Hill, Dorset, England. Excavations and survey of a Neolithic monument complex and its surrounding landscape. London, England: English Heritage Archaeological Reports.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milton, K. (2005). Afterword. In K. Milston & M. Svašek (Eds.), Mixed emotions: anthropological studies of feeling (pp. 215–224). Oxford, England: Berg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moran, D. (2000). Introduction to phenomenology. London, England: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson Stutz, L. (2003). Embodied ritual & ritualized bodies: Tracing ritual practices in Late Mesolithic burials. Lund, Sweden: Acta Archaeologica Lundensia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Overing, J., & Passes, A. (2000). Introduction: Conviviality and the opening up of Amazonian anthropology. In J. Overing & A. Passes (Eds.), The anthropology of love and anger: The aesthetics of conviviality in native Amazonia (pp. 1–30). London, England: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parrott, F. R. (2005). ‘It’s not forever’: The material culture of hope. Journal of Material Culture, 10(3), 245–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pryor, F. (1998). Etton: Excavations at a Neolithic causewayed enclosure near Maxey Cambridgeshire, 1982–1987. London, England: English Heritage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ratcliffe, M. (2002). Heidegger’s attunement and the neuropsychology of emotion. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 1(3), 287–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richards, M. P. (2000). Human consumption of plant foods in the British Neolithic: Direct evidence from bone stable isotopes. In A. Fairbairn (Ed.), Plants in Neolithic Britain and beyond (pp. 123–135). Oxford, England: Oxbow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, M. P. (2008) Hambledon Hill stable isotope vales. In R. Mercer & F. Healy (Eds.), Hambledon Hill, Dorset, England. Excavations and survey of a Neolithic monument complex and its surrounding landscape (pp. 522–527). London, England: English Heritage Archaeological Reports.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riviere, P. (2000). The more we are together…. In J. Overing & A. Passes (Eds.), The anthropology of love and anger: The aesthetics of conviviality in native Amazonia (pp. 252–268). London, England: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robb, J. E., & Harris, O. J. T. (2013). The body in history: Europe from the Palaeolithic to the future. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenwein, B. H. (2006). Emotional communities in the early middle ages. London, England: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowley-Conwy, P. (2004). How the west was lost. A reconsideration of the agricultural origins in Britain, Ireland and southern Scandinavia. Current Anthropology, 45, 83–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowley-Conwy, P., Albarella, U., & Dobney, K. (2012). Distinguishing wild boar and domestic pigs in prehistory: A review of approaches and recent results. Journal of World Prehistory, 25, 1–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schulting, R. J., & Wysocki, M. (2005). In this chambered tumulus were found cleft skulls…: An assessment of the evidence for cranial trauma in the British neolithic. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society, 71, 107–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seremetakis, C. N. (1991). The last word: Women, death and divination in inner Mani. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharples, N. M. (1991). Maiden Castle excavations and field survey 1985–1986. London, England: English Heritage Arcaeology Reports.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheets-Johnstone, M. (1999). Emotion and movement: A beginning empirical-phenomenological analysis of their relationship. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 6(11–12), 259–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheridan, A. (2010). The neolithization of Britain and Ireland: The ‘big picture’. In B. Finlayson & G. Warren (Eds.), Landscapes in transition (pp. 89–105). Oxford, England: Oxbow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, T., Seymour, B., O’Doherty, J., Kaube, H., Dolan, R. J., & Frith, C. D. (2004). Empathy for pain involves the affective but not sensory components of pain. Science, 303, 1157–1162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slaby, J. (2008). Affective intentionality and the feeling body. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 7, 429–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M., & Brickley, M. (2009). People of the long barrows: Life, death and burial in the earlier neolithic. Stroud, England: The History Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarlow, S. (2000). Emotion in archaeology. Current Anthropology, 41, 713–746.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, J. (1999). Understanding the Neolithic. London, England: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, J. (2008). The Mesolithic-Neolithic transition in Britain. In J. Pollard (Ed.), Prehistoric Britain (pp. 58–89). Oxford, England: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorpe, I. J. N. (2003). Anthropology, archaeology, and the origin of warfare. World Archaeology, 35, 145–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thorpe, I. J. N. (2006). Fighting and feuding in neolithic and bronze age Britain and Ireland. In T. Otto, H. Thrane, & H. Vandkilde (Eds.), Warfare and society: Archaeological and social anthropological perspectives (pp. 141–165). Aarhus, Denmark: Aarhus University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webmoor, T., & Witmore, C. L. (2008). Things are us! a commentary on human/things relations under the banner of a ‘social archaeology’. Norwegian Archaeological Review, 41(1), 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, A. B. (1992). Inalienable possessions: The paradox of keeping-while-giving. Oxford, CA: University of California Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Whittle, A. (2003). The archaeology of people: Dimensions of Neolithic life. London, England: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Whittle, A. (2007). Lived experience in the early neolithic of the great Hungarian plain. In D. Bailey, A. Whittle, & V. Cummings (Eds.), (Un)settling the Neolithic (pp. 64–70). Oxford, England: Oxbow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittle, A. (2013). Enclosures in the making: Knowledge, creativity and temporality. In A. Kulcsar & G. Anders (Eds.), Moments in time: Papers Presented to Pál Raczky on His 60th Birthday (pp. 457–466). Budapest, Hungary: L’Harmattan Kiado.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittle, A., Bayliss, A., & Wysocki, M. (2007). Once in a lifetime: The date of the Wayland’s Smithy long barrow. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 17(S1), 123–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whittle, A., Healy, F., & Bayliss, A. (2011). Gathering time: Dating the Early Neolithic enclosures of southern Britain and Ireland. Oxford, England: Oxbow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittle, A., Pollard, J., & Grigson, C. (1999). The harmony of symbols: The Windmill Hill causewayed enclosure. Oxford, England: Oxbow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yaeger, J. (2000). The social construction of communities in the classic Maya countryside: Strategies of affiliation in western Belize. In J. Yaeger & M. A. Canuto (Eds.), The archaeology of communities: A New World perspective (pp. 123–142). London, England: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yaeger, J., & Canuto, M. A. (2000). Introducing an archaeology of communities. In A. Canuto & J. Yaeger (Eds.), The archaeology of communities: A New World perspective (pp. 1–15). London, England: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Thanks go to Jeff Fleisher and Neil Norman for the invitation to appear in this volume and their patience in waiting for my submission. I am also enormously grateful to Alasdair Whittle and the editors for their comments on this piece. They have improved the work immensely, but they should not feel anxious that anyone will hold them responsible for its inevitable shortcomings. The article was written during a Leverhulme Trust Early Career Fellowship split between Newcastle University and the University of Leicester. I am enormously appreciative of both institutions and the trust for their support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Oliver J. T. Harris .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Harris, O.J.T. (2016). Communities of Anxiety: Gathering and Dwelling at Causewayed Enclosures in the British Neolithic. In: Fleisher, J., Norman, N. (eds) The Archaeology of Anxiety. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-3231-3_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-3231-3_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-3230-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-3231-3

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics