Skip to main content

Developing Solutions for Coexistence in the EU—Legal, Technical, and Economic Issues

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Coexistence of Genetically Modified, Organic and Conventional Foods

Part of the book series: Natural Resource Management and Policy ((NRMP,volume 49))

Abstract

Coexistence policy in the European Union (EU) is designed to avoid unintended and adventitious presence of genetically modified (GM) crops in other products, preventing the potential economic loss from admixture (European Commission 2010). Coexistence is a direct consequence of the decision to provide consumers with a well informed choice when it comes to food produced from GM crops. While a mandatory labeling regime identifies GM produce in the market place, the availability of both GM and non-GM depends on the possibility of a downstream supply chain to provide both goods. Therefore, what is commonly called “coexistence measures” are a set of technical, administrative, and liability rules set out to avoid the unintended presence of GM material in non-GM crops at the farm level. Hence coexistence measures are not environmental risk management tools but tools to resolve potential market failures arising from GM crop cultivation in the EU.

The views expressed are purely those of the authors and may not in any circumstances be regarded as stating an official position of the European Commission.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The EC funds a research project which will assess the cost of ex ante and ex post coexistence legislation and their effect on adoption. The project’s details and results can be found at http://price-coexistence.com/.

References

  • Areal, F.J., L. Riesgo, M. Gómez-Barbero, and E. Rodríguez-Cerezo. 2012. Consequences of a coexistence policy on the adoption of GMHT crops in the European Union. Food Policy 37(4): 401–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beckmann, V., C. Soregaroli, and J. Wesseler. 2006. Coexistence rules and regulations in the European Union. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 88(5): 1193–1199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beckmann, V., C. Soregaroli, and J. Wesseler. 2010. Ex-ante regulation and ex-post liability under uncertainty and irreversibility: Governing the coexistence of GM crops. Economics: The Open-Access Open Assessment E-Journal 4: 9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breustedt, G., J. Muller-Scheessel, and U. Latacz-Lohmann. 2008. Forecasting the adoption of GM oilseed rape: Evidence from a discrete choice experiment in Germany. Journal of Agricultural Economics 59(2): 237–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demont, M., W. Daems, K. Dillen, E. Mathijs, C. Sausse, and E. Tollens. 2008. Regulating coexistence in Europe: Beware of the domino-effect! Ecological Economics 64(4): 683–689.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demont, M., Y. Devos, and O. Sanvido. 2010. Towards flexible coexistence regulations for GM crops in the EU. EuroChoices 9(2): 18–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demont, M., K. Dillen, W. Daems, C. Sausse, E. Tollens, and E. Mathijs. 2009. On the proportionality of EU spatial ex ante coexistence regulations. Food Policy 34(6): 508–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devos, Y., M. Demont, K. Dillen, D. Reheul, M. Kaiser, and O. Sanvido. 2009. Coexistence of genetically modified (GM) and non-GM crops in the European Union. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 29: 11–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dillen, K., and E. Rodriguez Cerezo. 2013. 15 Years of coexistence between GM and Non-GM maize in Spain: What can be learned from it? Portugal: GMCC Lisbon.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Coexistence Bureau. 2010. Best practice documents for coexistence of genetically modified crops with conventional and organic farming: 1. Maize crop production. JRC Scientific and Technical Reports. E. Commission. EUR24509.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. 2003. Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2003 on genetically modified food and feed. Official Journal of the European Union L268: 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. 2009. On the coexistence of genetically modified crops with conventional and organic farming. COM(2009) 153 final.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. 2010. Commission recommendation of 13 July 2010 on guidelines for the development of national co-existence measures to avoid the unintended presence of GMOs in conventional and organic crops. Official Journal of the European Union C/200:1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koch, B.A. 2012. Liability and redress options for damage caused by GMOs. In Genetically modified and non-genetically modified food supply chains: Co-existence and traceability, ed. 403–413. London: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riesgo, L., F.J. Areal, O. Sanvido, and E. Rodriguez-Cerezo. 2010. Distances needed to limit cross-fertilization between GM and conventional maize in Europe. Nature Biotechnology 28(8): 780–782.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanvido, O., F. Widmer, M. Winzeler, B. Streit, E. Szerencsits, and F. Bigler. 2008. Definition and feasibility of isolation distances for transgenic maize. Transgenic Research 17: 317–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shavell, S. 1984. A model of the optimal use of liability and safety regulation. Rand Journal of Economics 15(2): 271–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skevas, T., P. Fevereiro, and J. Wesseler. 2010. Coexistence regulations and agriculture production: A case study of five Bt maize producers in Portugal. Ecological Economics 69(12): 2402–2408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skevas, T., J. Wesseler, and P. Fevereiro. 2009. Coping with ex-ante regulations for planting Bt Maize: The Portuguese experience. AgBioForum 12(1): 60–69.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) under Grant Agreement No. KBBE-2011-5-289157

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Koen Dillen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dillen, K., Rizov, I., Rodriguez-Cerezo, E. (2016). Developing Solutions for Coexistence in the EU—Legal, Technical, and Economic Issues. In: Kalaitzandonakes, N., Phillips, P., Wesseler, J., Smyth, S. (eds) The Coexistence of Genetically Modified, Organic and Conventional Foods. Natural Resource Management and Policy, vol 49. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-3727-1_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-3727-1_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-3725-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-3727-1

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics