Abstract
Despite inclusion in the American Cancer Society’s list of symptoms indicating possible malignancy, most women who present for evaluation of a nipple discharge will be found to have benign breast conditions or a cause extrinsic to the breast. Although approximately 5% of women presenting for breast evaluation will have a nipple discharge as their primary symptom, in most healthy women variable amounts of fluid can be obtained from the nipple with manual or mechanical stimulation. Of those presenting for evaluation of a nipple discharge, approximately 10–15% will be found to have an underlying breast malignancy. Patient age, characteristics of the discharge, and associated clinical and radiographic findings can be used to distinguish those who require specific evaluation to exclude carcinoma. To aid in this distinction, nipple discharge has been classified in the literature as secretion, which must be expressed, versus discharge, which is spontaneous (also termed provoked versus spontaneous). A classification of galactorrhea (milky) versus physiologic versus pathologic discharge has also been used. In the final analysis, the point of any classification is to identify patients whose symptoms indicate intrinsic breast pathology that requires a histologic diagnosis.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Bibliography
Bauer RL, Eckhert KH Jr, Nemoto T (1998) Ductal carcinoma in situ-associated nipple discharge: a clinical marker for locally extensive disease. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 5, 452–455.
Bolivar AV, Alvaro RML, Garcia EO (1997) Intraductal placement of a Kopans spring-hookwire guide to localize nonpalpable breast lesions detected by galactography. Acta Radiol. 38, 240–242.
Carter D (1977) Intraductal papillary tumors of the breast—a study of 78 cases. Cancer 39, 1689–1692.
Carty NJ, Mudan SS, Ravichandran D, Royle GT, Taglor I (1994) Prospective study of outcome in women presenting with nipple discharge. Ann. R. Coll. Surg. Engl. 76, 387–389.
Chaudary MA, Millis RR, Davies GC, Hayward JL (1982) Nipple discharge: the diagnostic value of testing for occult blood. Ann. Surg. 196, 651–655.
Chung SY, Lee KW, Park KS, Lee Y, Bae SH (1995) Breast tumors associated with nipple discharge: correlation of findings on galactography and sonography. Clin. Imaging 9, 165–171.
Ciatto S, Bravetti P, Cariaggi P (1986) Significance of nipple discharge clinical patterns in the selection of cases for cytologic examination. Acta Cytol. 30, 17–20.
Dawes LG, Bowen C, Venta LA, Morrow M (1998) Ductography for nipple discharge: no replacement for ductal excision. Surgery 124, 685–691.
Foretova L, Garber JE, Sadowsky NL, et al. (1998) Carcinoembryonic antigen in breast nipple aspirate fluid. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prey. 7, 195–198.
Gülay H, Bora S, Kilicturgay S, Hamaloglu E, Goksel HA (1994) Management of nipple discharge. J. Am. Coll. Surg. 178, 471–474.
Haagensen CD (1986) Diseases of the Breast. WB Saunders, Philadelphia.
Hittmair AP, Lininger RA, Tavassoli FA (1998) Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) in the male breast. Cancer 83, 2139–2149.
Hou M, Huang CJ, Huang YS, et al. (1998) Evaluation of galactography for nipple discharge. Clin. Imaging 22, 89–94.
Hou MF, Huang TJ, Huang YS, Hsieh JS (1995) A simple method of duct cannulation and localization for galactography before excision in patients with nipple discharge. Radiology 195, 568–569.
Hughes LE, Mansel RE, Webster DJT (eds.) (1989) Benign Disorders and Disease of the Breast: Concepts and Clinical Management. Baillière Tindall, London.
Ito Y, Tamaki Y, Nakano Y, et al. (1997) Nonpalpable breast cancer with nipple discharge: how should it be treated? Anticancer Res. 17, 791–894.
Jardines L (1996) Management of nipple discharge. Am. Surg. 62, 119–122.
Kawamoto M (1994) Breast cancer diagnosis by lactate dehydrogenase isoenzymes in nipple discharge. Cancer 73, 1836–1841.
Keller-Wood M, Bland KI (1991) Breast physiology in normal, lactating and diseased states. In: Bland KI, Copeland EM (eds.) The Breast. WB Saunders, Philadelphia, pp. 36–45.
King EB and Goodson, WH III (1991) Discharges and secretions of the nipple. In: Bland KI, Copeland EM (eds.) The Breast. WB Saunders, Philadelphia, pp. 46–67.
Kleinberg DL, Gordon LN, Frantz AG (1977) Galactorrhea: a study of 235 cases, including 48 with pituitary tumors. N. Engl. J. Med. 296, 589–600.
Kline TS Lash S (1962) Nipple secretion in pregnancy—a cytologic and histologic study. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 37, 626–632.
Koretz M, Strano S (1998) Bloody nipple discharge after lumpectomy (letter). Am. J. Radiol. 170, 1400.
Lafreniere R (1990) Bloody nipple discharge during pregnancy: a rationale for conservative treatment. J. Surg. Oncol. 43, 228–230.
Makita M, Sakamoto G, Akiyama F, et al. (1991) Duct endoscopy and endoscopic biopsy in the evaluation of nipple discharge. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 18, 179–188.
Ohuchi N, Abe R, Kasai M (1984) Possible cancerous change of intraductal papillomas of the breast. Cancer 54, 605–611.
Ohuchi N, Furuta A, Mori S (1994) Management of ductal carcinoma in situ with nipple discharge. Cancer 74, 1294–1302.
Petrakis NL (1986) Physiologic, biochemical, and cytologic aspects of nipple aspirate fluid. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 8, 7–19.
Petrakis NL (1993) Nipple aspirate fluid in epidemiologic studies of breast disease. Epidemiol. Rev. 15, 188–195.
Rongione AJ, Evans BD, Kling KM, McFadden DW (1996) Ductography is a useful technique in evaluation of abnormal nipple discharge. Am. Surg. 62, 785–788.
Sardanelli F, Imperiale A, Zandrino F, et al. (1997) Breast intraductal masses: ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration after galactography. Radiology 204, 143–148.
Sauter ER, Daly M, Linahan K, et al. (1996) Prostate-specific antigen levels in nipple aspirate fluid correlate with breast cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prey. 5, 967–970.
Sauter ER, Ross E, Daly M, et al. (1997) Nipple aspirate fluid: a promising non-invasive method to identify cellular markers of breast cancer risk. Br. J. Cancer 76, 494–501.
Seltzer MH, Perloff LJ, Kelley RI, Fitts WT Jr (1970) The significance of age in patients with nipple discharge. Surg. Gynecol. Obstet. 131, 519–522.
Van Zee KJ, Ortega Perez G, Minnard E, Cohen MA (1998) Preoperative galactography increases the diagnostic yield of major duct excision for nipple discharge. Cancer 82, 1974–1880.
Yoshimoto M, Kasumi F, Iwase T, Takahashi K, Tada T, Uchida Y (1997) Magnetic resonance galactography for a patient with nipple discharge. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 42, 87–90.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2002 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Boraas, M. (2002). Nipple Discharge. In: Torosian, M.H. (eds) Breast Cancer. Current Clinical Oncology. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59259-161-9_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59259-161-9_18
Publisher Name: Humana Press, Totowa, NJ
Print ISBN: 978-1-61737-216-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-59259-161-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive