Skip to main content

Should Abnormal Fetuses Be Brought to Term for the Sole Purpose of Providing Infant Transplant Organs?

  • Chapter
Biomedical Ethics Reviews · 1989

Part of the book series: Biomedical Ethics Reviews ((BER))

  • 42 Accesses

Abstract

I would deny that a woman who is pregnant with an anencephalic fetus has an obligation to continue the pregnancy in order to provide organs for transplant. Furthermore, if a woman in this situation were to ask me for advice about doing so, I would counsel against it. However, if I were consulted by an obstetrician with a patient who had already made up her mind and was determined to continue such a pregnancy for such a purpose, I would urge the physician to cooperate with her in this attempt (with certain qualifications to be explained below). To put my position in another way, I am convinced that there is no duty on the part of the mother to provide organs in this way; I am not even convinced that it is a wise thing for her to do; but I see no reason for saying that it would be wrong, if the woman strongly wanted to do so and understood what she was getting into.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes and References

  1. D. Alan Shewmon (1988) Anencephaly: Selected Medical Aspects. Hastings Center Report 18: 5, 11–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. lbid., p. 15.

    Google Scholar 

  3. bid.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ibid., p. 16.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Shewmon, pp. 14–15; cf D. Alan Shewmon (1988) Caution in the Definition and Diagnosis of Infant Brain Death, in Medical Ethics: A Guide for Health Professionals,(John F. Monagle and David C. Thomasma, eds.), Aspen Publishers, Rockville, MD, pp. 38–67, especially p. 49.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cf In re Quinlan,70 NJ, 10, 355 A2d 647; In re Conroy,98 NJ, 321, 486 A2nd 1209 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Susan Tefft Nicholson (1978) Abortion and the Roman Catholic Church,Religious Ethics, Knoxville, TN, pp. 53–54, 57,58.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cf Richard B. Brandt (1979) A Theory of the Good and the Right, Clarendon Press, Oxford, especially p. 113ff.

    Google Scholar 

  9. 1n re Conroy, at 1229.

    Google Scholar 

  10. James K. Walters and Stephen Ashwal (1988) Organ Prolongation in Anencephalic Infants: Ethical and Medical Issues, Hastings Center Report 18:5, pp. 22,23. “Ibid., p. 23.

    Google Scholar 

  11. For example, see President’s Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research (1981) Defining Death,US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, pp. 38–40.

    Google Scholar 

  12. This may be so for at least three reasons: a) as Shewmon indicates in the articles cited above, some definitions of anencephaly allow for the diagnosis when some upper-brain tissue is present; b) even if the diagnostic category of anencephaly is narrowed to rule out any upper brain tissue, there may be misdiagnoses in some cases; and c) as Shewmon also argues, it is possible that some upper brain function will be manifest within brain stem tissue in anencephalic newborns.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Alexander M. Capron (1987) Anencephalic Donors: Separate the Dead from the Dying, Hastings Center Report,17:1, p. 7.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Norman Fost (1988) Organs from Anencephalic Infants: An Idea Whose Time Has Not Yet Come, Hastings Center Report, 18: 5, p. 6.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ellen Goodman (1988) Giving Birth to an Organ Donor, Star/Tribune,December 12, 1987, A17; quoted in J. C. Willke, and Dave Andrusko, Personhood Redux

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hastings Center Report 18:5, p. 33.

    Google Scholar 

  17. J. C. Willke and Dave Andrusko (1988) Personhood Redux, Hastings Center Report 18: 5, p. 33.

    Google Scholar 

  18. The truth of the latter prediction might also be questioned, as it is by the Ethics and Social Impact Committee of the Transplant Policy Center: “It is now plain that members of the public who attend to such matters very generally endorse the use of anencephalics as donors, and applaud and honor the parents of such newborns when they seek to recapture, by donation, some great good through their pain.” (Ethics and Social Policy Committee, (1988) Anencephalic Infants as Sources of Transplantable Organs, Hastings Center Report Transplant Policy Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan, Hastings Center Report 18:5, p. 30.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1990 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Graber, G.C. (1990). Should Abnormal Fetuses Be Brought to Term for the Sole Purpose of Providing Infant Transplant Organs?. In: Humber, J.M., Almeder, R.F. (eds) Biomedical Ethics Reviews · 1989. Biomedical Ethics Reviews. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59259-444-3_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59259-444-3_1

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press, Totowa, NJ

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4757-4638-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-59259-444-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics