Skip to main content

Rationing, Rhetoric, and Rationality

A Review of the Health Care Rationing Debate in America and Europe

  • Chapter
Allocating Health Care Resources

Part of the book series: Biomedical Ethics Reviews ((BER))

Abstract

‘Ration’ is a six-letter four-letter word. Those who use the term typically do so to condemn, to shock, or to scandalize. Liberals and conservatives alike condemn President Clinton’s Health Care Reform1 simply by asserting that it “rations” heath care.2 Nothing more need be said—either in the US or in Europe —although American insularity tends to prevent Americans from noticing that Western Europeans, too, are repelled by the idea of rationing. Yet, even as popular culture on both sides of the Atlantic adamantly rejects any form of “rationing,” experts are arguing that health care systems must officially recognize and formally embrace rationing if they are to be efficient and fair. This chapter introduces readers to the rationing debates taking place on both sides of the Atlantic. It attempts to sort out various conceptions and models of rationing, and to differentiate among rhetorical posturing, substantive argument, and principled differences in the rationing debate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes and References

  1. Health Security Act,103 Congress, 1st Session, US Government Printing Offfice, Washington, DC, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dworkin, R. (1994) “Will Clinton’s plan be fair.” New York Review of Books, January 13, pp. 20–25.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Aaron, H. (1992) The Oregon Experiment, in Rationing America’s Medical Care: The Oregon Plan and Beyond, Strosberg, M., Wiener, J., and Baker, R., eds., The Brookings Institution, Washington, DC, p. 107.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Halper, T. (1989) The Misfortunes of Others, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p. 149.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Friedman, E. (1991) The uninsured: dilemma to crisis. JAMA 265, 2491–2495.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Wiener, J. M. (1992) Rationing in America: overt and covert, in Rationing America’s Medical Care: The Oregon Plan and Beyond, Strosberg, M., Wiener, J., and Baker, R., eds., The Brookings Institution, Washington, DC, p. 12.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Wiener, p. 12.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Wiener, pp. 12,13.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Wiener does, however, cite as the basis of his view. Merrill, J. and Cohen, A. B. (1987) The Emperor’s new clothes: unraveling the myths about rationing, Inquiry 24, pp. 105–109.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Williams, B. (1962) The ideal of equality, in Politics, Philosophy and Society II, Laslett and Runciman, eds., Blackwell, Oxford, reprinted in Williams, B. (1973) Problems of the Self: Philosophical Papers, 1956–1962, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p. 240, 241.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Nozick, R. (1974) Anarchy, State and Utopia, Basic Books, New York, pp. 233–235.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Klein, R. (1983) The Politics of the National Health Service, Lognman, London, p. 153.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Government Committee on Choices in Health Care (1992) Choices in Health Care, Zoetermeer, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hastings Center (1988) Guidelines on the Termination of Life-Sustaining Treatment and the Care of the Dying, Indiana University Press, Bloomington, p. 32.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Choices,p. 51

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kaplan, R. (1992) A quality of life approach to health resource allocation, in Rationing America’s Medical Care: The Oregon Plan and Beyond, Strosberg, M., Weiner, J., and Baker, R., eds., The Brookings Institution, Washington, DC, pp. 60–78.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lewin, T. (1994) “Prize in an unusual lottery: an experimental drug,” The New York Times, January 7, p. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Starzl, T., Hakala, T., and Tzakis, A. (1987) A multifactorial system for equitable selection of cadaver kidney recipients. JAMA, 257, 3073–3075.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. US General Accounting Office (1990) Health Insurance Cost Increases Lead to Coverage Limitations and Cost Shifting,Washington DC.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Eckstein, H. (1958) The English Health Service: Its Origins, Structure, and Achievements, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, p. 172; see also Klein, R. (1983) The Politics of the National Health Service, Longman Group Ltd., London, pp. 62–66.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Eckholm, E. (1993) Study links paperwork to 25% of hospital costs, The New York Times, August 5, p. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Eckholm, E. (1993) Some fear rationing of health care. The New York Times, November 14, 4A, p. 17.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Yates, J. (1987) Why Are We Waiting? An Analysis of Hospital Waiting Lists, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Aaron, H. and Schwartz, W. (1984) The Painful Prescription: Rationing Hospital Care, The Brookings Institution, Washington DC, p. 58.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Government Committee on Choices in Health Care (1992) Choices inHealth Care, Zoetermeer, The Netherlands, p. 20.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Baker, R. (1993) A study of physician gatekeeping in the British National Health Service. Professional Ethics, 2, pp. 3–34.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Sarin, A. (1994) Caring Denmark writes off the old. Le Monde, February 8 (International Edition).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Dworkin, R. (1994) Will Clinton’s plan be fair. New York Review of Books, January 13, p 21.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Kolnia, G. (1993) Mammogram guideline dropped. The New York Times, December 5, Section 1, p. 30.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Mooreim, E. H. (1993) Balancing Act, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Dworkin, R. (1993) Life’s Dominion, Knopf, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Lubitz, J. and Riley, G. (1993) Trends in Medicare payments in the last years of life. N. Engl. J. Med. 328, 1092–1096.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Emanuel, E. and Emanuel, L. (1994) The economics of dying. N. Engl. J. Med. 330, 540–544.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Daniels, N. (1988) Am I My Parents’ Keeper,Oxford University Press, New York. Both Callahan and Daniels presume some version of what Daniels characterizes as the “prudential life span account,” in which an individual’s life is viewed through various phases of the aging process: childhood, youth, adulthood, age. In this chapter, I arbitrarily characterize each of the four ages of humankind as quadrants; I also presume that the medically assisted life-span is about 100 years—hence, there are four quadrants, the last of which is from 75 to 100.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Brock, D. (1989) Justice, health care and the elderly, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 18, 297–312.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Brock, D. (1993) Life and Death, Cambridge University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Callahan, D. (1987) Setting Limits, Simon and Schuster, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  38. For a good overview of British discussion of QALYs see Bioethics 6 July 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Menzel, P. (1990) Strong Medicine, Oxford University Press, New York. See also the review of Strong Medicine by Julian Savulescu, and the response by Menzel in the British journal, Bioethics 65, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  40. See Baker, R. and Strosberg, M. (1992) Triage and equality: a historical reassessment of utilitarian analyses of triage, Kennedy Institute of Ethics J. 2 103–124.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Hadorn, D. (1991) The Oregon price setting exercise. Hastings Center Report 21, 11–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Baker, R. (1993) Visibility and the just allocation of health care. Health Care Analysis 1, 139–150.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1995 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Baker, R. (1995). Rationing, Rhetoric, and Rationality. In: Humber, J.M., Almeder, R.F. (eds) Allocating Health Care Resources. Biomedical Ethics Reviews. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59259-447-4_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59259-447-4_3

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press, Totowa, NJ

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4757-4479-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-59259-447-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics