Skip to main content

Rehabilitation Strategies Following Articular Cartilage Surgery in the Knee

  • Chapter
Cartilage Repair Strategies
  • 1385 Accesses

Abstract

Advances in the understanding of the basic science inherent to articular cartilage has led to an evolution in the design of rehabilitation guidelines following articular cartilage surgery. Clinicians responsible for the rehabilitation of patients following articular cartilage surgery must respect the healing process associated with each individual procedure. Rehabilitation principles should be adhered to in order to safely progress the patient through the rehabilitative course. Treatment interventions to improve range of motion, enhance weight-bearing capability, develop strength, restore balance and proprioception, and enhance flexibility need to follow. A key task is to guide the patient into an active role in the rehabilitation process. Complying with activity modifications and practicing home therapeutic exercises are an important part of achieving a successful outcome.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Buckwalter JA, Mankin HJ. Articular cartilage I Tissue design and chondrocyte-matrix interactions. J Bone Joint Surg 1997;79A:600–611.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Walker JM. Pathomechanics and classification of cartilage lesions, facilitation of repair. J Orth Sports Phys Ther 1998;28:216–231.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Palmoski MJ, Colyer RA, Brandt KD. Joint motion in the absence of normal loading does not maintain normal articular cartilage. Arthritis Rheum 1980;23:325–334.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Mankin HJ. The response of articular cartilage to mechanical injury. J Bone Joint Surg 1982; 64A:460–466.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Rosenberg TD, Paulos LE, Parker RD, et al. The 45∘ posteroanterior flexion weightbearing radiograph of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg 1988;70A:1479–1483.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kegerreis S. The construction and implementation of a functional progression as a component of athletic rehabilitation. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther July–August 1983:14.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cavanaugh JT. Rehabilitation for Non Operative and Operative Management of Knee Injuries. In: Callaghan J, Simonian P, Wickiewicz T, eds., The Adult Knee. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2003:380–430.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Walker JM. Pathomechanics and classification of cartilage lesions, facilitation of repair. J Orth Sports Phys Ther 1998;28:216–231.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Buckwalter JA. Effects of early motion on healing of musculoskeletal tissues. Hand Clin 1996; 12:13–24.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Petersen L. Autologous chondrocyte transplantation. Articular cartilage regeneration: chondrocyte transplantation and other technologies. Paper presented at: Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons; February 1997; San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Rodrigo JJ, Steadman JR, Silliman JF, et al. Improvement of full-thickness chondral defect healing in the human knee after debridement and microfracture using continuous passive motion. Am J Knee Surg 1994;7:109–116.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Salter RB, Simmonds DF, Malcolm BW, Rumble EJ, MacMichael D, Clements ND. The biological effect of continuous passive motion on the healing of fullthickness defects in articular cartilage. An experimental investigation in the rabbit. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1980;62:1232–1251.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Suh J, Aroen A, Mozzonigro T, et al. Injury and repair of articular cartilage: related scientific issues. Oper Tech Orthop 1997;7:270–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Benum P. Operative mobilization of stiff knees after surgical treatment of knee injuries and posttraumatic conditions. Acta Orthop Scand 1982;53:625–631.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Matsusue Y, Yamamuro T, Hama H. Arthroscopic multiple osteochondral transplantation to the chondral defect in the knee associated with anterior cruciate ligament disruption. Arthroscopy 1993;9:318–321.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Perry J, Antonelli D, Ford W. Analysis of knee-joint forces during flexed-knee stance. J Bone Joint Surg 1975;57A:961–967.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Fulkerson JP, Hungerford D. Disorders of the Patellofemoral Joint. 2nd ed. Baltimore, MD: Williams and Wilkins; 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Mow VC, Rosenwasser M. Articular cartilage: biomechanics. In: Woo SL-Y, Buckwalter JA, eds., Injury and Repair of the Musculoskeletal Soft Tissues. Park Ridge, IL: AAOS; 1988:427–463.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Spencer JD, Hayes KC, Alexander LJ. Knee joint effusion and quadriceps inhibition in man. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1984;65:171–177.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Bates A, Hanson N. The principles and properties of water. In Bates and Hanson, eds.: Aquatic Exercise Therapy. Philadelphia: Saunders; 1996:1–320.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Harrison RA, Hilman M, Bulstrode S. Loading of the lower limb when walking partially immersed: Implications for clinical practice. Physiotherapy 1992;78:164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Schwartz RE, Asnis PD, Cavanaugh JT, et al. Short crank cycle ergometry J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1991;13:95.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Wilk KE, Escamilla RF, Fleisig GS, et al. A comparison of tibiofemoral joint forces and electromyographic activity during open and closed kinetic chain exercises. Am J Sports Med 1996;24:518–527.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Escamilla RF, Fleisig GS, Zheng N, et al. Biomechanics of the knee during closed kinetic chain and open kinetic chain exercises. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1998;30:556–569.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Palmitier RA, An KN, Scott SG, Chao EYS. Kinetic chain exercises in knee rehabilitation. Sports Med 1991;11:402–413.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Cipriani DJ, Armstrong CW, Gaul S. Backward walking at three levels of treadmill inclination: an electromyographic and kinematic analysis. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1995;22:95–102.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Cavanaugh JT, Stump TJ. Forward step down test. J Orth Sports Phys Ther 2000;30:A–46.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Borsa PA, Lephart SM, Irrgang JJ, et al. The effects of joint position sense on proprioceptive sensibility in anterior cruciate ligament deficient athletes. Am J Sports Med 1997;25:336–340.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Corrigan JP, Cashman WF, Brady MP. Proprioception in the cruciate deficient knee. J Bone Joint Surgery 1992;74B:247–250.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Freeman MA, Dean MR, Hanham IW. The etiology and prevention of functional instability of the foot. J Bone Joint Surg 1965;47B:669–677.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Skinner HB, Barrack RL, Cook SD, et al. Joint position sense in total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Res 1984;1:276–283.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Beard DJ, Kyberd PJ, Ferfusson CM, et al. Proprioception after reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. An objective indication of the need for surgery. J. Bone Joint Surgery Br 1993;73B:311–315.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Voight M, Blackburn T. Proprioception and balance training and testing following injury. In: Ellenbecker TS, ed., Knee Ligament Rehabilitation. Philadelphia: Churchill Livingston; 2000;361–385.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Nisell R, Ericson MO, Nemeth G, et al. Tibiofemoral joint forces during isokinetic knee extension. Am J Sports Med 1989;17:49–54.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Kaufman KR, An KN, Litchy WJ, et al. Dynamic joint forces during knee isokinetic exercise. Am J Sports Med 1991;19:305–316.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Daniel DM, Malcolm L, Stone ML, et al. Quantification of knee stability and function. Contemp Orthop 1982;5:83–91.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Barber SD, Noyes FR, Mangine RE, et al. Quantitative assessment of functional limitations in normal and anterior cruciate ligament deficient knees. Clin Orthop 1990;255:204–214.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Humana Press Inc., Totowa, NJ

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cavanaugh, J.T. (2007). Rehabilitation Strategies Following Articular Cartilage Surgery in the Knee. In: Williams, R.J. (eds) Cartilage Repair Strategies. Humana Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59745-343-1_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59745-343-1_20

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-58829-629-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-59745-343-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics