Skip to main content

Patient Selection and Perioperative Management

  • Chapter
Robotic Urologic Surgery

Abstract

Robotic surgery is rapidly gaining popularity throughout the United States. Increasing numbers of hospitals are offering robotic procedures for a variety of indications. Surgical patients, especially those considered higher risk, benefit from the minimally invasive nature of robotic surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Cathelineau X, Widmer H, Rozert F, et al. Telerobotic-assisted prostatectomy. In Ballantyne G, Marescaux J, Giulianotti P, eds. Primer of Robotic and Telerobotic Surgery. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2004:206–211.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dripps RD, Lamont A, Eckenhoff JE. The role of anesthesia in surgical mortality. JAMA 1961;178: 261–266.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ludemann R, Krysztopik R, Jamieson GG, et al. Pneumothorax during laparoscopy. Surg Endosc 2003;17:1985–1989.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Walsh PC. Anatomic radical prostatectomy: evolution of the surgical technique. J Urol 1998;160: 2418–2424.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Guillonneau B, Cathelineau X, Barret E, et al. [Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Preliminary evaluation after 28 interventions]. Presse Med 1998;27:1570–1574.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Menon M, Tewari A, Peabody J. Vattikuti Institute Prostatectomy: technique. J Urol 2003;169: 2289–2292.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Tewari A, Menon M. Vattikuti Institute Prostatectomy: surgical technique and current results. Curr Urol Rep 2003;4:119–123.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Guillonneau B, Vallancien G. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the Montsouris experience.J Urol 2000;163:418–422.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Ahlering TE, Woo D, Eichel L, et al. Robot-assisted versus open radical prostatectomy: a comparison of one surgeon’s outcomes. Urology 2004;63: 819–822.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Menon M, Shrivastava A, Tewari A, et al. Laparoscopic and robot assisted radical prostatectomy: establishment of a structured program and preliminary analysis of outcomes. J Urol 2002;168: 945–949.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ahlering TE, Skarecky D, Lee D, et al. Successful transfer of open surgical skills to a laparoscopic environment using a robotic interface: initial experience with laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Urol 2003;170:1738–1741.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Menon M, Tewari A, Baize B, et al. Prospective comparison of radical retropubic prostatectomy and robot-assisted anatomic prostatectomy: the Vattikuti Urology Institute experience. Urology 2002;60:864–868.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Herrell SD, Smith JA Jr. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: what is the learning curve? Urology 2005;66(suppl 5):105–107.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Patel VR, Tully AS, Holmes R, et al. Robotic radical prostatectomy in the community setting — the learning curve and beyond: initial 200 cases. J Urol 2005;174:269–272.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kopelman PG. Obesity as a medical problem. Nature 2000;404:635–643.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Flegal KM, Carroll MD, Ogden CL, et al. Prevalence and trends in obesity among US adults, 1999-2000. JAMA 2002;288:1723–1727.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ahlering TE, Eichel L, Edwards R, et al. Impact of obesity on clinical outcomes in robotic prostatectomy. Urology 2005;65:740–744.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Stein JP, Lieskovsky G, Cote R, et al. Radical cystectomy in the treatment of invasive bladder cancer: long-term results in 1,054 patients. J Clin Oncol 2001;19:666–675.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Hobisch A, Tosun K, Kinzl J, et al. Quality of life after cystectomy and orthotopic neobladder versus ileal conduit urinary diversion. World J Urol 2000;18:338–344.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Farnham SB, Cookson MS, Alberts G, et al. Benefit of radical cystectomy in the elderly patient with significant co-morbidities. Urol Oncol 2004;22: 178–181.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Palapattu GS, Haisfield-Wolfe ME, Walker JM, et al. Assessment of perioperative psychological distress in patients undergoing radical cystectomy for bladder cancer. J Urol 2004;172:1814–1817.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Maffezzini M, Gerbi G, Campodonico F, et al. Perioperative management of ablative and reconstructive surgery for invasive bladder cancer in the elderly. Surg Oncol 2004;13:197–200.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Savage SJ. Radical cystectomy: the minimally invasive approach. Urol Oncol 2004;22:262–263.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Chang SS, Cookson MS, Hassan JM, et al. Routine postoperative intensive care monitoring is not necessary after radical cystectomy. J Urol 2002; 167:1321–1324.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Dahm P, Tuttle-Newhall JE, Yowell CW, et al. Indications for surgical intensive care unit admission of postoperative urologic patients. Urology 2000; 55:334–338.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Knaus WA, Draper EA, Wagner DP, et al. APACHE II: a severity of disease classification system. Crit Care Med 1985;13:818–829.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Inman BA, Harel F, Tiguert R, et al. Routine nasogastric tubes are not required following cystectomy with urinary diversion: a comparative analysis of 430 patients. J Urol 2003;170: 1888–1891.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Pruthi RS, Chun J, Richman M. Reducing time to oral diet and hospital discharge in patients undergoing radical cystectomy using a perioperative care plan. Urology 2003;62:661–665; discussion 665–666.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Strong DW, Pearse HD. Recurrent urothelial tumors following surgery for transitional cell carcinoma of the upper urinary tract. Cancer 1976;38: 2173–2183.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Zimmerman, G.E., Guru, K.A., Kim, H.L., Mohler, J.L. (2007). Patient Selection and Perioperative Management. In: Patel, V.R. (eds) Robotic Urologic Surgery. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-704-6_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-704-6_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-84628-545-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-84628-704-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics