Skip to main content

A Methodology for Promoting Reliable Human-System Interaction

  • Chapter
Handbook of Performability Engineering

Abstract

A qualitative methodology is proposed that can help both designers and managers anticipate problems, which are often manifest as human errors, that people will have in interacting with various products and systems. The methodology adapts a number of well-known hazard evaluation techniques so that they can be applied to human performance, and combines them in a way that increases the analytical team’s ability to predict the possibility for human performance failures and their consequences. A basis is also provided for examining explanations for these failures, and for providing categorical severity and likelihood assessments of these consequences. The importance of assessing the impact of barriers on adverse consequences is also discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 429.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 549.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 549.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Kirwan B. A Guide to practical human reliability assessment. London: Taylor and Francis, 1994

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kumamoto H, Henley EJ. Probabilistic risk assessment and management for engineers and scientists, Second Edition. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE Press., 1996

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hollnagel E. Cognitive reliability and error analysis method. New York: Elsevier, 1998

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bello GC, Colombari V. The human factors of risk analyses in process plants: The control room operator model “TESEO.” Reliability Engineering 1980 1:3–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Swain AD, Guttmann HE. Handbook of human reliability analysis with emphasis on nuclear power plant applications. NUREG/CR-1278, Washington, DC: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Wallace B, Ross A. Beyond human error: taxonomies and safety science. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 2006

    Google Scholar 

  7. CCPS (Center for Chemical Process Safety). Guidelines for Preventing Human Error in Process Safety. New York: American Institute of Chemical Engineers, 1994

    Google Scholar 

  8. Koppel R, Metlay JP, Cohen A, Abaluck B, Localio AR, Kimmel S, Strom BL. Role of computerized physician order entry systems in facilitating medical errors. JAMA 2005; 293:1197–1203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Sharit J. Human error. In: Salvendy G, editor. Handbook of human factors and ergonomics, Third Edition. New York: Wiley, 2006; 708–760.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Wears RL, Berg, M. Computer technology and clinical work: Still waiting for Godot. JAMA 2005 293:1261–1263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Perrow C. Normal accidents: Living with high-risk technologies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kirwan, B, Ainsworth LK. Guide to task Analysis. London: Taylor and Francis, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Luczak H. Task analysis. In: Salvendy G, editor. Handbook of human factors and ergonomics, Second Edition. New York: Wiley, 1997; 340–416.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Shepherd A. Hierarchical task analysis. London: Taylor and Francis, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Wickens CD, Lee JD, Liu Y, Becker SE. An introduction to human factors engineering, Second Edition. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  16. CISHC (Chemical Industry and Safety Council). A Guide to Hazard and Operability Studies. London: Chemical Industries Association. 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  17. CCPS (Center for Chemical Process Safety). Guidelines for Hazard Evaluation Procedures, Second Edition with Worked Examples. New York: American Institute of Chemical Engineers, 1992

    Google Scholar 

  18. Comer PJ, Fitt FS, Ostebo R. A Driller’s HAZOP method. Society of Petroleum Engineers, SPE 15867, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Sharit J. Perspectives on computer aiding in cognitive work domains: Toward predictions of effectiveness and use. Ergonomics 2003; 46:126–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hollnagel E. Barriers and accident prevention. Aldershot, England: Ashgate, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sharit, J. (2008). A Methodology for Promoting Reliable Human-System Interaction. In: Misra, K.B. (eds) Handbook of Performability Engineering. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84800-131-2_40

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84800-131-2_40

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-84800-130-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-84800-131-2

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics