Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Springer Series in Reliability Engineering ((RELIABILITY))

  • 1290 Accesses

Abstract

The application of large-scale digital or computer systems involves many components, elements, and modules. System reliability and safety need to be calculated no matter how complicated is the structure. Estimation of system reliability/safety provides useful information for system design and verification. Risk allocation to the designed system in a balanced manner is an application example.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Kang HG, Jang SC, Ha JJ (2002) Evaluation of the impact of the digital safety-critical I&C systems, ISOFIC2002, Seoul, Korea, November 2002

    Google Scholar 

  2. Sancaktar S, Schulz T (2003) Development of the PRA for the AP1000, ICAPP '03, Cordoba, Spain, May 2003

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hisamochi K, Suzuki H, Oda S (2002) Importance evaluation for digital control systems of ABWR Plant, The 7th Korea-Japan PSA Workshop, Jeju, Korea, May 2002

    Google Scholar 

  4. HSE (1998) The use of computers in safety-critical applications, London, HSE books

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kang HG, et al. (2003) Survey of the advanced designs of safety-critical digital systems from the PSA viewpoint, Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute, KAERI/AR-00669/2003

    Google Scholar 

  6. Goldberg BE, Everhart K, Stevens R, Babbitt N III, Clemens P, Stout L (1994) System engineering “Toolbox” for design-oriented engineers, NASA Reference Publication 1358

    Google Scholar 

  7. Meshkat L, Dugan JB, Andrews JD (2000) Analysis of safety systems with ondemand and dynamic failure modes, Proceedings of 2000 RM

    Google Scholar 

  8. White RM, Boettcher DB (1994) Putting Sizewell B digital protection in context, Nuclear Engineering International, pp. 41–43

    Google Scholar 

  9. Parnas DL, Asmis GJK, Madey J (1991) Assessment of safety-critical software in nuclear power plants, Nuclear Safety, Vol. 32, No. 2

    Google Scholar 

  10. Butler RW, Finelli GB (1993) The infeasibility of quantifying the reliability of lifecritical real-time software, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, Vol. 19, No. 1

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kang HG, Sung T, et al (2000) Determination of the Number of Software Tests Using Probabilistic Safety Assessment KNS conference, Proceeding of Korean Nuclear Society, Taejon, Korea

    Google Scholar 

  12. Littlewood B, Wright D (1997) Some conservative stopping rules for the operational testing of safety-critical software, IEEE Trans. Software Engineering, Vol. 23, No. 11, pp. 673–685

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Saiedian H (1996) An Invitation to formal methods, Computer

    Google Scholar 

  14. Rushby J (1993) Formal methods and the certification of critical systems, SRI-CSL-93-07, Computer Science Laboratory, SRI International, Menlo Park

    Google Scholar 

  15. Welbourne D (1997) Safety critical software in nuclear power, The GEC Journal of Technology, Vol. 14, No. 1

    Google Scholar 

  16. Dahll G (1998) The use of Bayesian belief nets in safety assessment of software based system, HWP-527, Halden Project

    Google Scholar 

  17. Eom HS, et al. (2001) Survey of Bayesian belief nets for quantitative reliability assessment of safety critical software used in nuclear power plants, Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute, KAERI/AR-594-2001, 2001

    Google Scholar 

  18. Littlewood B, Popov P, Strigini L (1999) A note on estimation of functionally diverse system, Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Vol. 66, No. 1, pp. 93-95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Bastl W, Bock HW (1998) German qualification and assessment of digital I&C systems important to safety, Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Vol. 59, pp. 163-170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Choi JG, Seong PH (2001) Dependability estimation of a digital system with consideration of software masking effects on hardware faults, Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Vol. 71, pp. 45-55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Bayrak T, Grabowski MR (2002) Safety-critical wide area network performance evaluation, ECIS 2002, June 6–8, Gdańsk, Poland

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kang HG, Jang SC (2006) Application of condition-based HRA method for a manual actuation of the safety features in a nuclear power plant, Reliability Engineering & System Safety, Vol. 91

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kauffmann JV, Lanik GT, Spence RA, Trager EA (1992) Operating experience feedback report – human performance in operating events, USNRC, NUREG-1257, Vol. 8, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  24. Decortis F (1993) Operator strategies in a dynamic environment in relation to an operator model, Ergonomics, Vol. 36, No. 11

    Google Scholar 

  25. Park J, Jung W (2003) The requisite characteristics for diagnosis procedures based on the empirical findings of the operators’ behavior under emergency situations, Reliability Engineering & System Safety, Volume 81, Issue 2

    Google Scholar 

  26. Julius JA, Jorgenson EJ, Parry GW, Mosleh AM (1996) Procedure for the analysis of errors of commission during non-power mode of nuclear power plant operation, Reliability Engineering & System Safety, Vol. 53

    Google Scholar 

  27. OECD/NEA Committee on the safety of nuclear installations, 1999, ICDE project report on collection and analysis of common-cause failures of centrifugal pumps, NEA/CSNI/R(99)2

    Google Scholar 

  28. OECD/NEA Committee on the safety of nuclear installations, 2003, ICDE project report: Collection and analysis of common-cause failures of check valves, NEA/CSNI/R(2003)15

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kang, H. (2009). Issues in System Reliability and Risk Model. In: Seong, P. (eds) Reliability and Risk Issues in Large Scale Safety-critical Digital Control Systems. Springer Series in Reliability Engineering. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84800-384-2_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84800-384-2_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-84800-383-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-84800-384-2

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics