Skip to main content

Understanding the Waste Net: A Method for Waste Elimination Prioritization in Product Development

  • Conference paper
Global Perspective for Competitive Enterprise, Economy and Ecology

Part of the book series: Advanced Concurrent Engineering ((ACENG))

Abstract

This paper describes a method for prioritization of waste reduction efforts during a Product Development System (PDS) improvement project. Waste refers to activities that absorb resources and increase cost without adding value. Although waste identification and elimination along the value chain has proven useful to PDS improvement, previous work focuses on the waste identification, rather than on its prioritization. This work aims to fill this gap by proposing a “waste coupling” based method to define this sequencing. The method uses a waste set composed of 10 waste types specified into 28 subtypes. The approach is illustrated by an example of possible causal dependencies among subtypes in which both direct and indirect (reinforcement) waste relations are included. This paper’s main contributions are: (1) defining a PD specific waste set covering all the PDS elements; (2) describing a procedure to calculate the impact of coupling between wastes through indirect relations; and (3) presenting a heuristic to prioritize from highly coupled waste subsets.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Cheng, L. C., 2003, “QFD em Desenvolvimento de Produto: Características Metodológicas e um Guia para Intervenção,” Revista Produção Online, Florianópolis, v. 3, n. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Rozenfeld, H. et al, 2006, “Gestão de Desenvolvimento de Produtos,” São Paulo, Editora Saraiva.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Murman, E. et al., 2002, “Lean Enterprise Value: Insights,” New York, Polgrave, MIT’s LAI.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. Negele, H. et al., 1999, “Modelling of Integrated Product Development Processes,” In: Annual Symposium of Incose, 9th., Proceedings…[S.l.]: [s.n.].

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dvir, D., Lipovetsky, S., and Shenhar, A. J., 2003, “What is really important for project success?,” International Journal of Management and decision Making, v.4, n. 4, p. 382–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ohno, T., 1998, “Toyota production system,” New York: Productivity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Womack, J. P., and Jones, D. T., 2003, “Lean Thinking,” New York, Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Millard, R. L., 2001, “Value Stream Analysis and Mapping for Product Development,” Thesis (S.M.) - Aeronautics and Astronautics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Mcmanus, H., 2004, “Product Development Value Stream Mapping (PDVSM) Manual,” Beta draft, Cambridge: MIT Lean Aerospace Initiative.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kato, J., 2005, “Development of a Process for Continuous Creation of Lean Value in Product Development Organizations,” Thesis (Master), Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bauch, C., 2004, “Lean Product Development: Making waste transparent,” Thesis (Diploma) – Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Michael. L. G., 2006, “Lean Six Sigma for Services,” New York, McGrawHil.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Liker, J. K., 2004, “The Toyota Way: 14 Management Principles from the World's Greatest Manufacturer,” New York, McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Morgan, J. M., and Liker J. K., 2006, “The Toyota product development system,” New York, Productivity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ward, A., 2007, “Lean product and process development,” Cambridge, The Lean Enterprise Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gershenfeld, J. and Rebentisch, E., 2004, “The Impact of Instability on Complex Social and Technical Systems,” Proceedings from MIT Engineering Systems Division External Symposium

    Google Scholar 

  17. Pessôa, M. V. P., 2008, “Weaving the waste net: a model to the product development system low performance drivers and its causes,” Lean Aerospace Initiative Report WP08-01, MIT, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Steward, D.V., 1981, “The Design Structure System: A Method for Managing the Design of Complex Systems,” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, Vol. 28, pp. 71-74.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Yassine, A., 2004, “An Introduction to Modeling and Analyzing Complex Product Development Processes Using the Design Structure Matrix (DSM) Method,” Quaderni di Management, n.9, (Italian Management Review), www.quaderni-dimanagement.it .

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marcus V. P. Pessôa .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer London

About this paper

Cite this paper

Pessôa, M., Seering, W., Rebentisch, E., Bauch, C. (2009). Understanding the Waste Net: A Method for Waste Elimination Prioritization in Product Development. In: Chou, SY., Trappey, A., Pokojski, J., Smith, S. (eds) Global Perspective for Competitive Enterprise, Economy and Ecology. Advanced Concurrent Engineering. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84882-762-2_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84882-762-2_22

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-84882-761-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-84882-762-2

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics