Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Références
Georgen SK, Evans J, Cohen GPB, MacMillan GH (1997) Characteristics of breast carcinomas missed by screening radiologists. Radiology 204: 131–5
Hofvind S, Geller B, Skaane P (2008) Mammographic features and histopathological findings of interval breast cancers. Acta Radiol 40 (9): 975–81
Taourel P, Merigeaud S, Aubert E et al (2009) Tomosynthèse: luxe ou nécessité? J Radiol 90: 1813–21
Athanasiou A, Tardivon A, Tanter M et al (2010) Breast lesions: quantitative elastography with supersonic shear imaging-preliminary results. Radiology 256 1: 297–303
Sardanelli S, Boetes C, Borisch B and al (2010) Magnetic resonance imaging of the Breast:Recommendations from the EUSOMA working group. Eur Radiol 46: 1296–316
BI-RADS Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (2004) Atlas d’imagerie du sein, ACR Bi-Rads. Deuxième édition française basée sur la 4e édition américaine. SFR Ed
Thomassin-Naggara I, Salem C, Darai E et al (2009) Le rehaussement sans masse en IRM mammaire: comment j’interprète? J Radiol 90: 1–7
Tabar L, Dean P (2001) Teaching Atlas of mammography. Thieme Ed, Stuttgart-New York
Schrading S, Kuhl C (2008) Mammographic, US, and MRI Imaging phenotypes of familial breast cancer. Radiology 246: 58–70
Mesurolle B, Kadoch L, El-Khoury M et al (2007) Sonographic features of breast carcinoma presenting as masses in BRCA gene mutation carriers. J Ultrasound Med 26: 817–24
Gilbert F, Warren RM, Kwan-Lim G et al (2009) Cancers in BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers and in women at high risk for breast cancer: MR Imaging and mammographic features. Radiology 252: 358–68.
Wallis M, Tardivon A, Helbich T, Schreer I (2007) Guidelines from the European Society of Breast Imaging for diagnostic interventional breast procedures. Eur Radiol 17: 581–8
Schueller G, Jaromi S, Ponhold L (2008) US-guided 14-gauge core-needle breast biopsy: results of validation study in 1 352 cases. Radiology 248 (2): 406–13
Youk JH, Kim EK, Kim MJ, Oh KK (2008) Sonographically guided 14-gauge core needle biopsy of breast masses: a review of 2 420 cases with long-term follow-up. Am J Roentgenol 190 (1): 202–7
Liberman L (2002) Percutaneous image-guided core breast biopsy. Radiol Clin North Am 40 (3): 483–500
Lomoschitz FM, Helbich TH, Rudas M et al (2004) Stereotactic 11-gauge vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: influence of number of specimens on diagnostic accuracy. Radiology 232: 897–903
Bagnall MJ, Evans AJ, Wilson AR et al (2000) When have mammography calcifications been adequately sampled at needle core biopsy? Clin Radiol 55: 548–53
Penco S, Rizzo S, Bozzini AC et al (2010) Stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy is not a therapeutic procedure even when all mammographically found calcifications are removed: analysis of 4,086 procedures. Am J Roentgenol 195 (5): 1255–60
Chaveron C, Bachelle F, Fauquet I et al (2009) Déplacements de clip postmacrobiopsie sous guidage stéréotaxique et repérage préopératoire: trucs et astuces. J Radiol 90: 31–6
Kim MJ, Kim EK, Kwak JY et al (2008) Nonmalignant papillary lesions of the breast at USguide directional vacuum-assisted removal: a preliminary report. Eur Radiol Sep 18 (9): 1774–83
Cassano E, Urban LA, Pizzamiglio M et al (2007) Ultrasound-guided vacuum-assisted core breast biopsy: experience with 406 cases breast cancer. Res Treat 102 (1): 103–10
Li JL, Wang ZL, Su L, Liu XJ, Tang J (2010) Breast lesions with ultrasound imaging-histologic discordance at 16-gauge core needle biopsy: can re-biopsy with 10-gauge vacuum-assisted system get definitive diagnosis? Breast; 19 (6): 446–9
Sebag P, Tourasse C, Rouyer N et al (2006) Place des macrobiopsies assistées par le vide sous guidage échographique: étude multi-centrique de 650 lésions. J Radiol 87 (1): 29–34
Heywang-Köbrunner SH, Sinnatamby R, Lebeau A et al (2009) Interdisciplinary consensus on the uses and technique of MR-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy (VAB): Results of a European consensus meeting. Eur J Radiol 72 (2): 289–94
Trop I, Labelle M, David J et al (2010) Second-look targeted studies aft er breast magnetic resonance imaging: practical tips to improve lesion identification. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol 39 (5): 200–11
Meissnitzer M, Dershaw DD, Lee CH, Morris EA (2009) Targeted ultrasound of the breast in women with abnormal MRI findings for whom biopsy has been recommended. Am J Roentgenol 193 (4): 1025–9
Balu-Maestro C, Ettore F, Chapellier C (2006) Quand se méfier des résultats des micro-et macrobiopsies guides mammaires? J Radiol 87 (3): 265–73
Darling MLR, Smith DN, Lester SC et al (2000) Atypical ductal hyperplasia and ductal carcinoma in situ as revealed by large core needle breast biopsy: Results of surgical excision. Am J Roentgenol 175: 1341–6
Jackman R, Burbank F, Parker SH et al (2001) Stereotactic breast biopsy of nonpalpable lesions: determinants of ductal carcinoma in situ underestimation rates. Radiology 218: 497–502.
Perlet C, Heywang-Köbrunner SH, Heinig A (2006) Magnetic resonance-guided, vacuumassisted breast biopsy: results from a European multicenter study of 538 lesions. Cancer 106: 982–90
Liberman L, Drotmen M, Morris EA et al (2000) Imaging-histologic discordance at percutaneous breast biopsy. An indicator of missed cancer. Cancer 89 (12): 2538–46
Boisserie-Lacroix M (2006) Le dispositif d’annonce du cancer du sein: quelle place pour la radiologue? J Radiol 87: 105–8
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer-Verlag France, Paris
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Boisserie-Lacroix, M., Asad-Syed, M., Hurtevent-Labrot, G., Ferron, S. (2012). Diagnostic et décisions dans le cancer du sein précoce Facteurs de décision en radiologie. In: Diagnostic et décision dans le cancer du sein à un stade précoce. Collection Oncologie Pratique. Springer, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-2-8178-0253-4_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-2-8178-0253-4_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Paris
Print ISBN: 978-2-8178-0252-7
Online ISBN: 978-2-8178-0253-4