Skip to main content

Breast cancer, cytoprognostic grades and proliferative activity (DNA ploidy, S phase)

  • Conference paper
Cancer Treatment An Update
  • 71 Accesses

Abstract

Increase of breast cancer diagnosis especially of T1 tumors (over 60 % in 1990), decrease of N+ cancers (65 % in 1970, 45 % in 1990), the fact that we know that 30 % patients with N- cancers will metastase within 5 years after the diagnosis do modify indeed our appreciation of classical prognostic factors and especially of the importance of lymphnode involvement. The histoprognostic grade described by Scarff-Bloom and Richardson (SBR) keeps its value despite the large proportion of SBRII which have no specific predictive value [1]. Le Doussal and al [2] showed that SBR (modified SBR) influenced metastasis free survival of N-patients and allowed to recognize low risk and high risk categories.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bloom HJ, Richardson WW (1957) Histological grading and prognosis in breast cancer: a study of 1409 cases of which 359 have been followed for 15 years. Br J Cancer 11: 359–377

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Le Doussal V, Tubiana-Hulin M, Friedman S, Hacene K, Spyratos F, Brunet M (1989) Prognostic value of histologic grade nuclear components of Scarff-Bloom-Richardson (SBR). An improve score modification based on a multivariate analysis of 1262 invasive ductal breast carcinomas. Cancer 64: 1914–1921

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. De Maublanc MA, Zajdela A (1981) Actualités de la cytologie mammaire par ponction aspiration. Evaluation des moyens de diagnostic du cancer du sein. JMT Conseil, Paris: 143–151

    Google Scholar 

  4. De Maublanc MA, Remvikos Y, Collet JF, Lesec G (1992) Cytoponctions des cancers du sein et facteurs de pronostic. Cah Oncol 1: 113–123

    Google Scholar 

  5. De Maublanc MA, Briffod M (7–1989) Cytodiagnostic en pathologie mammaire. Encycl Med Chir (Paris-France), Sein 810, F10, 7 p

    Google Scholar 

  6. Scarff W, Torloni H (1981). Type histologique des tumeurs du sein. Classification histologique internationale des tumeurs. N° 2, 2eEdt, OMS, Genève

    Google Scholar 

  7. Remvikos Y, Beuzeboc P, Zajdela A, Voillemot N, Magdelenat H, Pouillart P (1990) Correlation of pretreatment proliferative activity of breast cancer with the response to cytotoxic chemotherapy. J Natl Cancer Inst 81: 1383–1387

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1994 Springer-Verlag France

About this paper

Cite this paper

de Maublanc, M.A. (1994). Breast cancer, cytoprognostic grades and proliferative activity (DNA ploidy, S phase). In: Banzet, P., Holland, J.F., Khayat, D., Weil, M. (eds) Cancer Treatment An Update. Springer, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-2-8178-0765-2_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-2-8178-0765-2_20

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Paris

  • Print ISBN: 978-2-8178-0767-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-2-8178-0765-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics