Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Philosophy of Quantitative Methods

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Method Matters in Psychology

Part of the book series: Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics ((SAPERE,volume 45))

Abstract

This chapter undertakes a philosophical examination of four prominent quantitative research methods that are employed in the behavioural sciences. It begins by outlining a scientific realist methodology that can help illuminate the conceptual foundations of behavioural research methods. Typically, these methods contribute to either the detection of empirical phenomena or the construction of explanatory theory. The methods selected for critical examination are exploratory data analysis, Bayesian confirmation theory, meta-analysis, and causal modelling. The chapter concludes with a brief consideration of directions that might be taken in future philosophical work on quantitative methods. Two additional quantitative methods, exploratory factor analysis and tests of statistical significance, are examined in more detail in separate chapters.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Anastasi, A., & Urbina, S. (1997). Psychological testing (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bangert-Drowns, R. L. (1986). Review of developments in meta-analytic method. Psychol. Bull., 99, 388–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Behrens, J. T., & Yu, C.-H. (2003). Exploratory data analysis. In J. A. Schinka & W. F. Velicer (Eds.), Handbook of psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 33–64). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhaskar, R. (1975). A realist philosophy of science. Brighton, England: Harvester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhaskar, R. (1979). The possibility of naturalism. Brighton, England: Harvester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Block, N. J. (1976). Fictionalism, functionalism, and factor analysis. In R. S. Cohen, C. A. Hooker, & A. C. Michalos (Eds.), Boston studies in the philosophy of science (Vol. 32, pp. 127–141). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borsboom, D. (2005). Measuring the mind: Conceptual issues in contemporary psychometrics. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Borsboom, D. (2008). Latent variable theory. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 6, 25–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunge, M. (2008). Bayesianism: Science or-pseudoscience? International Review of Victimology, 15, 165–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chow, S. L. (1996). Statistical significance: Rationale, validity, and utility. London, England: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cliff, N. (1983). Some cautions concerning the application of causal modeling methods. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 18, 115–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, T. D., Cooper, H., Cordray, D. S., Hartmann, H., Hedges, L. V., Light, R. J., et al. (1992). Meta-analysis for explanation: A casebook. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Earman, J. (1992). Bayes or bust? A critical examination of Bayesian confirmation theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Efron, B., & Tibshirani, R. (1993). An introduction to the bootstrap. New York: Chapman & Hall.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ehrenberg, A. S. C., & Bound, J. A. (1993). Predictability and prediction. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Part 2, 156, 167–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fidell, L. S., & Tabachnick, B. G. (2003). Preparatory data analysis. In J. A. Schibehaviornka & W. F. Velicer (Eds.), Handbook of psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 115–121). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glass, G. V. (1972). The wisdom of scientific inquiry on education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 9, 3–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glass, G. V. (1976). Primary, secondary, and meta-analysis of research. Educational Researcher, 5, 3–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glass, G. V., & Kleigl, R. M. (1983). An apology for research integration in the study of psychotherapy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 51, 28–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glass, G. V., McGaw, B., & Smith, M. L. (1981). Meta-analysis in social research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glymour, C. N. (1980). Theory and evidence. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godfrey-Smith, P. (2009). Causal pluralism. In H. Beebee, C. Hitchcock, & P. Menzies (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of causation (pp. 326–337). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Good, I. J. (1983). The philosophy of exploratory data analysis. Philosophy of Science, 50, 283–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gottfredson, G. D. (1984). A theory-ridden approach to program evaluation. American Psychologist, 39, 1101–1112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gould, S. J. (1996). The mismeasure of man (2nd ed.). New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, J. D. (1992). Realism, empiricism, and social constructionism. Theory and Psychology, 2, 131–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haig, B. D. (1987). Scientific problems and the conduct of research. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 19, 22–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haig, B. D. (2005). An abductive theory of scientific method. Psychological Methods, 10, 371–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haig, B. D. (2009). Inference to the best explanation: A neglected approach to theory appraisal in psychology. American Journal of Psychology, 122, 219–234.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Harré, R., & Madden, E. H. (1975). Causal powers. Oxford, England: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooker, C. A. (1987). A realistic theory of science. New York: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howson, C., & Urbach, P. (2006). Scientific reasoning: The Bayesian approach (3rd ed.). La Salle, IL: Open Court.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (2004). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, D. (2000). Structural equation modeling: Foundations and extensions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenny, D. (1979). Correlation and causation. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. S. (1996). The structure of scientific revolutions (3rd ed.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press (originally published, 1962).

    Google Scholar 

  • Laudan, L. (1981). Science and hypothesis. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Reidel.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lipton, P. (2004). Inference to the best explanation (2nd ed.). London, England: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manicas, P. T. (1989). Explanation and quantification. In B. Glassner & J. D. Moreno (Eds.), The qualitative-quantitative distinction in the social sciences (pp. 179–205). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Manicas, P. T., & Secord, P. F. (1983). Implications for psychology of the new philosophy of science. American Psychologist, 38, 399–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markus, K., Hawes, S. S., & Thasites, R. (2008). Abductive inference to psychological variables: Steiger’s question and best explanations in psychopathy. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 64, 1069–1088.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell, G. (1962). The ontological status of theoretical entities. In H. Feigl & G. Maxwell (Eds.), Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science (Vol. 3, pp. 3–28). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGrew, T. (2003). Confirmation, heuristics, and explanatory reasoning. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 54, 553–567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGuire, W. J. (1997). Creative hypothesis generating in psychology: Some useful heuristics. Annual Review of Psychology, 48, 1–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michell, J. (2004). The place of qualitative research in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 1, 307–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mulaik, S.A. (1985) Exploratory Statistics and Empiricism. Philosophy of Science, 52(3), 410–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nickles, T. (1981). What is a problem that we might solve-it? Synthese, 47, 85–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nickles, T. (1987). Twixt method and madness. In N. J. Nersessian (Ed.), The process of science (pp. 41–67). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pratschke, J. (2003). Realistic models? Critical realism and statistical models in the social sciences. Philosophica, 71, 13–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Proctor, R. W., & Capaldi, E. J. (2001). Empirical evaluation and justification of methodologies in psychological science. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 759–772.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Psillos, S. (2004). Inference to the best explanation and Bayesianism =. In F. Stadler (Ed.), Induction and deduction in the sciences (pp. 83–91). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rozeboom, W. W. (1997). Good science is abductive, not hypothetico-deductive. In L. L. Harlow, S. A. Mulaik, & J. H. Steiger (Eds.), What if there were no significance tests? (pp. 335–391). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salmon, W. C. (1984). Scientific explanation and the causal structure of the world. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sayer, A. (1992). Methods in social science: A realist approach (2nd ed.). London, England: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, F. L. (1992). What do data really mean? Research findings, meta-analysis, and cumulative knowledge in psychology. American Psychologist, 47, 1173–1181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, F. L. (1993). Meta-analysis and cumulative knowledge. Contemporary Psychology, 38, 1163–1165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A. (1985). Spurious correlation: A causal interpretation. In H. M. Blalock (Ed.), Causal models in the social sciences (2nd ed., pp. 7–21). New York: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M. L., Glass, G. V., & Miller, T. I. (1980). The benefits of psychotherapy. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sohn, D. (1996). Meta-analysis and science. Theory and Psychology, 6, 229–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A. L. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Thagard, P. (1992). Conceptual revolutions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thagard, P. (1999). How scientists explain disease. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trout, J. D. (1998). Measuring the intentional world: Realism, naturalism, and quantitative methods in the behavioral sciences. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tukey, J. W. (1962). The future of data analysis. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 33, 1–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tukey, J. W. (1969). Analyzing data: Sanctification or detective work? American Psychologist, 24, 83–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tukey, J. W. (1977). Exploratory data analysis. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tukey, J. W. (1980). We need both exploratory and confirmatory. American Statistician, 34, 23–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisberg, J. (2009). Locating IBE in the Bayesian framework. Synthese, 167, 125–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, L., & The Task Force on Statistical Inference. (1999). Statistical methods in psychology journals: Guidelines and explanations. American Psychologist, 54, 594–604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodward, J. (1989). Data and phenomena. Synthese, 79, 393–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu, C.-H. (2006). Philosophical foundations of quantitative research methodology. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand

    Brian D. Haig

Authors
  1. Brian D. Haig
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brian D. Haig .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Haig, B.D. (2018). The Philosophy of Quantitative Methods. In: Method Matters in Psychology. Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics, vol 45. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01051-5_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation