Abstract
A topic model is a statistical model for extracting latent clusters or themes from the text in a collection of documents. The purpose of this study was to apply a topic model to two educational assessments. In the first study, the model was applied to students’ written responses to an extended response item on an English Language Arts (ELA) test. In the second study, a topic model was applied to the errors students’ made on a fractions computation test. The results for the first study showed five distinct writing patterns were detected in students’ writing on the ELA test. Two of the patterns were related to low scores, two patterns were associated with high scores and one pattern was unrelated to the score on the test. In the second study, five error patterns (i.e., latent topics) were detected on the pre-test and six error patterns were detected on the post-test for the fractions computation test. The results for Study 2 also yielded evidence of instructional effects on students’ fractions computation ability. Following instruction, more students in the experimental instruction condition made fewer errors than students in the business-as-usual condition.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bisgin, H., Liu, Z., Fang, H., Xu, X., & Tong, W. (2011, December). Mining FDA drug labels using an unsupervised learning technique-topic modeling. In BMC bioinformatics Vol. 12, No. 10, p. S11. BioMed Central.
Blei, D. M., Ng, A. Y., Jordan, M., & I,. (2003). Latent dirichlet allocation. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 3, 993–1022.
Blei, D. M. (2012). Probabilistic topic models. Communications of the ACM, 55(4), 77–84.
Bottge, B. A., Ma, X., Gassaway, L., Toland, M., Butler, M., & Cho, S. J. (2014). Effects of blended instructional models on math performance. Exceptional Children, 80, 423–437.
Brookhart, S. M. (2010). How to assess higher-order thinking skills in your classroom. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
Green, S. B., & Yang, Y. (2009). Reliability of Summed Item Scores Using Structural Equation Modeling: An Alternative to Coefficient Alpha. Psychometrika, 74, 155–167.
Griffiths, T. L., & Steyvers, M. (2004). Finding scientific topics. Proceedings of the National academy of Sciences, 101(suppl 1), 5228–5235.
Grimmer, J. (2010). A Bayesian hierarchical topic model for political texts: Measuring expressed agendas in Senate press releases. Political Analysis, 18(1), 1–35.
Hornik, K., & Grün, B. (2011). topicmodels: An R package for fitting topic models. Journal of Statistical Software, 40(13), 1–30.
Hu, D. J. (2009). Latent dirichlet allocation for text, images, and music. University of California, San Diego. Retrieved November, 16, 2018, from http://cseweb.ucsd.edu/~dhu/docs/research_exam09.pdf.
Lau, J. H., Collier, N., & Baldwin, T. (2012). On-line trend analysis with topic models: # twitter trends detection topic model online. Proceedings of COLING, 2012, 1519–1534.
Lauderdale, B. E., & Clark, T. S. (2014). Scaling politically meaningful dimensions using texts and votes. American Journal of Political Science, 58(3), 754–771.
Rhody, L. (2012). Topic modeling and figurative language. Journal of Digital Humanities, 2(1), pp. 19-35. Lauderdale, B. E., & Clark, T. S. (2014). Scaling politically meaningful dimensions using texts and votes. American Journal of Political Science, 58(3), pp. 754-771.
Roberts, M. E., Stewart, B. M., & Tingley, D. (2018). stm: R Package for Structural Topic Models. http://www.structuraltopicmodel.com.
Spiegelhalter, D. J., Best, N. G., & Carlin, B. P. (1998). Bayesian deviance, the effective number of parameters, and the comparison of arbitrarily complex models. Medical Research Council Biostatistics Unit, Cambridge, UK: Technical report.
Steyvers, M., & Griffiths, T. (2007). Probabilistic topic models. In T. Landauer, D. McNamara, S. Dennis, & W. Kintsch (Eds.), Handbook of latent semantic analysis: A road to meaning. Hillsdale (pp. 427-448). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Acknowledgements
The fractions computation data used in the article were collected with the following support: the U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, PR Number H324A090179.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Choi, HJ., Kwak, M., Kim, S., Xiong, J., Cohen, A.S., Bottge, B.A. (2019). An Application of a Topic Model to Two Educational Assessments. In: Wiberg, M., Culpepper, S., Janssen, R., González, J., Molenaar, D. (eds) Quantitative Psychology. IMPS IMPS 2017 2018. Springer Proceedings in Mathematics & Statistics, vol 265. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01310-3_38
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01310-3_38
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-01309-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-01310-3
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)