Skip to main content

An Application of a Topic Model to Two Educational Assessments

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Quantitative Psychology (IMPS 2017, IMPS 2018)

Abstract

A topic model is a statistical model for extracting latent clusters or themes from the text in a collection of documents. The purpose of this study was to apply a topic model to two educational assessments. In the first study, the model was applied to students’ written responses to an extended response item on an English Language Arts (ELA) test. In the second study, a topic model was applied to the errors students’ made on a fractions computation test. The results for the first study showed five distinct writing patterns were detected in students’ writing on the ELA test. Two of the patterns were related to low scores, two patterns were associated with high scores and one pattern was unrelated to the score on the test. In the second study, five error patterns (i.e., latent topics) were detected on the pre-test and six error patterns were detected on the post-test for the fractions computation test. The results for Study 2 also yielded evidence of instructional effects on students’ fractions computation ability. Following instruction, more students in the experimental instruction condition made fewer errors than students in the business-as-usual condition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bisgin, H., Liu, Z., Fang, H., Xu, X., & Tong, W. (2011, December). Mining FDA drug labels using an unsupervised learning technique-topic modeling. In BMC bioinformatics Vol. 12, No. 10, p. S11. BioMed Central.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blei, D. M., Ng, A. Y., Jordan, M., & I,. (2003). Latent dirichlet allocation. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 3, 993–1022.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blei, D. M. (2012). Probabilistic topic models. Communications of the ACM, 55(4), 77–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bottge, B. A., Ma, X., Gassaway, L., Toland, M., Butler, M., & Cho, S. J. (2014). Effects of blended instructional models on math performance. Exceptional Children, 80, 423–437.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brookhart, S. M. (2010). How to assess higher-order thinking skills in your classroom. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, S. B., & Yang, Y. (2009). Reliability of Summed Item Scores Using Structural Equation Modeling: An Alternative to Coefficient Alpha. Psychometrika, 74, 155–167.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, T. L., & Steyvers, M. (2004). Finding scientific topics. Proceedings of the National academy of Sciences, 101(suppl 1), 5228–5235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grimmer, J. (2010). A Bayesian hierarchical topic model for political texts: Measuring expressed agendas in Senate press releases. Political Analysis, 18(1), 1–35.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Hornik, K., & Grün, B. (2011). topicmodels: An R package for fitting topic models. Journal of Statistical Software, 40(13), 1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu, D. J. (2009). Latent dirichlet allocation for text, images, and music. University of California, San Diego. Retrieved November, 16, 2018, from http://cseweb.ucsd.edu/~dhu/docs/research_exam09.pdf.

  • Lau, J. H., Collier, N., & Baldwin, T. (2012). On-line trend analysis with topic models: # twitter trends detection topic model online. Proceedings of COLING, 2012, 1519–1534.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lauderdale, B. E., & Clark, T. S. (2014). Scaling politically meaningful dimensions using texts and votes. American Journal of Political Science, 58(3), 754–771.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rhody, L. (2012). Topic modeling and figurative language. Journal of Digital Humanities, 2(1), pp. 19-35. Lauderdale, B. E., & Clark, T. S. (2014). Scaling politically meaningful dimensions using texts and votes. American Journal of Political Science, 58(3), pp. 754-771.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, M. E., Stewart, B. M., & Tingley, D. (2018). stm: R Package for Structural Topic Models. http://www.structuraltopicmodel.com.

  • Spiegelhalter, D. J., Best, N. G., & Carlin, B. P. (1998). Bayesian deviance, the effective number of parameters, and the comparison of arbitrarily complex models. Medical Research Council Biostatistics Unit, Cambridge, UK: Technical report.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steyvers, M., & Griffiths, T. (2007). Probabilistic topic models. In T. Landauer, D. McNamara, S. Dennis, & W. Kintsch (Eds.), Handbook of latent semantic analysis: A road to meaning. Hillsdale (pp. 427-448). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The fractions computation data used in the article were collected with the following support: the U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, PR Number H324A090179.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hye-Jeong Choi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Choi, HJ., Kwak, M., Kim, S., Xiong, J., Cohen, A.S., Bottge, B.A. (2019). An Application of a Topic Model to Two Educational Assessments. In: Wiberg, M., Culpepper, S., Janssen, R., González, J., Molenaar, D. (eds) Quantitative Psychology. IMPS IMPS 2017 2018. Springer Proceedings in Mathematics & Statistics, vol 265. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01310-3_38

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics