Skip to main content

Intuitionistic Fuzzy Approach Toward Evolutionary Robust Optimization of an Industrial Grinding Operation Under Uncertainty

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Optimization in Industry

Part of the book series: Management and Industrial Engineering ((MINEN))

  • 944 Accesses

Abstract

The existence of uncertainty is inherent and unavoidable in process systems. The sources of it might be linked, though not limited, to the estimation of model parameters through experimental/regression exercises and their related errors apart from the regular variations in the process operations. Thus, the outcomes of an optimization study by assuming uncertain parameters as non-varying one, as opposite to the actual scenario, would prompt to incorrect results and sometimes even infeasible solutions. One of the ways to handle such situations is by using intuitionistic fuzzy numbers (IFNs) to represent the uncertainty which considers both the membership and the nonmembership degree and carry out the uncertainty analysis based on the intuitionistic fuzzy logic. In this study, the above approach has been adopted to a real-life case study which contains highly nonlinear parameters named industrial grinding process considering different moods of a decision-maker under uncertain situations, i.e., optimistic, pessimistic, and mixed. Various sources of uncertainties are categorized as uncertainties related to model parameters (e.g., tuning parameters inside the model) and operational parameters (e.g., feed stream uncertainties), and their individual and amalgamated effects on the grinding process which is a multi-objective optimization problem have been analyzed. A novel way of determining the parametric sensitivity in presence of number of uncertain parameters has also been proposed. Based on the extent of non-determinacy to be resolved, the newly defined membership degree enables conducting comparative study of fuzzy and intuitionistic fuzzy robust optimization under different scenarios. Additionally, comparative analysis has been carried out for the proposed IFRO algorithm with the benchmark robust worst-case formulation (Ben-Tal and Nemirovskii 2001) and it has been observed that IFRO gives better results when compared with the worst-case formulation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Sahinidis, N. V. (2004). Optimization under uncertainty: State-of-the-art and opportunities. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 28, 971–983.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ben-Tal, A., & Nemirovskii, A. (2001). Lectures on modern convex optimization: Analysis, algorithms, and engineering applications. MPS-SIAM Series on optimization. Philadelphia: MPS-SIAM.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Liu, B. (2002). Theory and practice of uncertain programming. Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. Liu, M. L., & Sahinidis, N. V. (1996). Optimization in process planning under uncertainty. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, 35, 4154–4165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Charnes, A., & Cooper, W. W. (1959). Chance-constrained programming. Management Science, 6, 73–79.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Gupta, A., & Maranas, C. D. (2000). A two-stage modeling and solution framework for multisite midterm planning under demand uncertainty. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, 39, 3799–3813.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ayoub, N., Martins, R., Wang, K., Seki, H., & Naka, Y. (2007). Two levels decision system for efficient planning and implementation of bioenergy production. Energy Conversion and Management, 48, 709–723.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Mitra, K., Gudi, R. D., Patwardhan, S. C., & Sardar, G. (2008). Midterm supply chain planning under uncertainty: a multi-objective chance constrained programming framework. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, 47, 5501–5511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Zadeh, L. A. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 8, 338–353.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Palwak, Z. (1985). Rough sets and fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 17, 99–102.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Gau, W. L., & Buehrer, D. J. (1993). Vague sets. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 23, 610–614.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Sambuc, R. (1975). Fonctions φ-floues. Application l’aide au diagnostic en pathologie thyroidienne, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Marseille, France.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Zimmermann, H. J. (1991). Fuzzy set theory and its application. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  14. Dubois, D., & Prade, H. (1988). Possibility theory: An approach to computerized processing of uncertainty. New York: Plenum Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  15. Virivinti, N., & Mitra, K. (2014). Fuzzy expected value analysis of an industrial grinding process. Powder Technology, 286, 9–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Tian, G., Chu, J., Liu, Y., Ke, H., Zhao, X., & Xu, G. (2011). Expected energy analysis for industrial process planning problem with fuzzy time parameters. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 35, 2905–2912.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Mitra, K. (2009). Multi-objective optimization of an industrial grinding operation under uncertainty. Chemical Engineering Science, 64, 5043–5056.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Virivinti, N., & Mitra, K. (2016). A comparative study of fuzzy techniques to handle uncertainty: An industrial grinding process. Chemical Engineering and Technology, 39, 1031–1039.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Marano, G. C., & Quaranta, G. (2009). Robust optimum criteria for tuned mass dampers in fuzzy environments. Applied Soft Computing, 9, 1232–1243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhang, X., Huang, G. H., Chan, C. W., Liu, Z., & Lin, Q. (2010). A fuzzy-robust stochastic multiobjective programming approach for petroleum waste management planning. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 34, 2778–2788.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Diez, M., & Peri, D. (2010). Robust optimization for ship conceptual design. Ocean Engineering, 37, 966–977.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Capolei, A., Suwartadi, E., Foss, B., & Jorgensen J. B. (2015). A mean–variance objective for robust production optimization in uncertain geological scenarios. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 125, 23–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Atanassov, K. T. (1986). Intutionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 20, 87–96.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Virivinti, N., & Mitra, K. (2015). Intuitionistic fuzzy chance constrained programming for handling parametric uncertainty: An industrial grinding case study. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, 54, 6291–6304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Deb, K. (2001). Multi-objective optimization using evolutionary algorithms. Chichester, UK: Wiley.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Yager, R. R. (2009). Some aspects of intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, 8, 67–90.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. Bellman, R., & Zadeh, L. A. (1970). Decision-making in a fuzzy environment. Management Science, 17, 141–161.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  28. Angelov, P. P. (1997). Optimization in an intuitionistic fuzzy environment. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 86, 299–306.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  29. Liu, B., & Liu, Y. K. (2002). Expected value of fuzzy variable and fuzzy expected value models. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 10, 445–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Dubey, D., Chandra, S., & Mehra, A. (2012). Fuzzy linear programming under interval uncertainty based on IFS representation. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 188, 68–87.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  31. Petzold, L. R. (1983). A description of DASSL: A differential/algebraic system solver. In Scientific computing (pp. 65–68). North-Holland, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Mitra, K., & Gopinath, R. (2004). Multiobjective optimization of an industrial grinding operation using elitist non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm. Chemical Engineering Science, 59, 385–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kishalay Mitra .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Virivinti, N., Mitra, K. (2019). Intuitionistic Fuzzy Approach Toward Evolutionary Robust Optimization of an Industrial Grinding Operation Under Uncertainty. In: Datta, S., Davim, J. (eds) Optimization in Industry. Management and Industrial Engineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01641-8_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01641-8_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-01640-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-01641-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics