Abstract
The smartification of industries is marked by the development of cyber-physical systems, interfaces, intelligent software featuring knowledge models, empirical real-time data, and feedback-loops. This brings up new requirements and challenges for HMI design and industrial labor. Social sciences can contribute to such engineering projects with their perspectives, concepts and knowledge. Hence, we claim that, in addition to following their own intellectual curiosities, the social sciences can and should contribute to such projects in terms of an ‘applied’ science, helping to foster interdisciplinary collaboration and providing toolkits and devices for what we call ‘interdisciplinary diplomacy’. We illustrate the benefits of such an approach, support them with selected examples of our involvement in such an engineering project and propose using methods as diplomatic devices and concepts as social theory plug-ins. The article ends with an outlook and reflection on the remaining issue of whether and in how far such ‘applied’ and critical social science can or should be integrated.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Berg, M. (1998). The politics of technology: On bringing social theory into technological design. Science, Technology and Human Values, 23(4), 455–491.
Bucciarelli, L. L. (1994). Designing engineers. MIT Press.
Collins, H. M. (2001). What is tacit knowledge? In: Schatzki/Cetina/Savigny (Eds.), The practice turn in contemporary theory (pp. 115–128).
Dewey, J. (1896) The reflex arc concept in psychology. Psychological Review 3, American Psychological Association, (pp. 357–370).
Dewey, J. (2006). The public and its problems. USA: Ohio University Press.
Dittrich, Y., Rönkkö, K., Eriksson, J., Hansson, C., & Lindeberg, O. (2008). Cooperative method development. Empirical Software Engineering, 13(3), 231–260.
Gad, C., & Jensen, C. B. (2016). Lateral concepts. Engaging Science, Technology, and Society, 2, 3–12.
Hannay, J. E., Sjoberg, D. I. K., & Dyba, T. (2007). A systematic review of theory use in software engineering experiments. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 33(2), 87–107.
Horkheimer, M. (2002). Traditional and critical theory. In: Ibid: Critical theory. Continuum (pp. 188–243).
Jander, H., Borgvall, J., & Ramberg, R. (2016). Towards a methodological framework for HMI readiness evaluation. Human Factors and Ergonomics, 56, 2349–2353.
Jensen, C. B. (2001). CSCW design reconceptualised through science studies. AI & Society, 15(3), 200–215.
Jensen, C. B., & Morita, A. (2015). Infrastructures as ontological experiments. Engaging Science, Technology and Society, 1, 81–87.
Latour, B. (1990). Technology is society made durable. The Sociological Review, 38(1), 103–131.
Latour, B. (2003). Is re-modernization occuring—And if so, how to prove it?: A commentary on Ulrich Beck. Theory Culture and Society, 20(2), 35–48.
Liu, Y., Osvalder, A.-L., & Karlsson, M. A. (2010). Considering the importance of user profiles in interface design. In: Mátrai (Ed.), User interfaces (pp. 61–80). Intech.
Mead, G. H. (1923). Scientific method and the moral sciences. International Journal of Ethics, 33, 229–247.
Mead, G. H. (1903). The definition of the psychical. Decennial Publications of the University of Chicago, 3, 77–112.
Mol, A. (2008). The logic of care: Health and the problem of patient choice. London: Routledge.
Niewöhner, J. (2014). Perspektiven der Infrastrukturforschung: carefull, relational, kolobariv. In Lengersdorf and Wieser (Eds.), Schlüsselwerke der Science and Technology Studies. Transcript (pp. 341–353).
Passoth, J.-H. (2015). Heterogenität und die Hybriden: Die Unbestimmtheiten der Actor-Network Theory. In Kron (Ed.), Hybride Sozialität-Soziale Hybridität. Velbrück Wissenschaft (pp. 89–108).
Passoth, J.-H., & Müller, P. (forthcoming). Socio-technical arrangements of smart factory HMI. In Schüller and Niggemann (Eds.), SpringerOpen IMPROVE Special Issue. Berlin: Springer.
Posada, J., Toro, C., & Barandiaran, I. (2015). Visual computing as a key enabling technology for Industrie 4.0 and industrial internet. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 35(2), 26–40.
Schegloff, E. A., & Sacks, H. (1973). Opening up closings. Semiotica, 8, 289–327.
Tore, D., Prikladnicki, R., Rönkkö, K., Reaman, C., & Sillito, J. (2011). Qualitative research in software engineering. Empirical Software Engineering, 16(4), 425–429.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Müller, P., Passoth, JH. (2018). Engineering Collaborative Social Science Toolkits. STS Methods and Concepts as Devices for Interdisciplinary Diplomacy. In: Karafillidis, A., Weidner, R. (eds) Developing Support Technologies. Biosystems & Biorobotics, vol 23. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01836-8_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01836-8_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-01835-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-01836-8
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)