Abstract
Green infrastructure is understood to be a critical feature of sustainable cities, providing numerous benefits to people and wildlife. However, there are challenges associated with its planning, design and delivery related to skills and knowledge in the built environment sector and the importance placed on green infrastructure in the development process. The sector often turns to assessment systems to ensure that new developments are sustainable, with the standards and criteria they include being used to inform those responsible for delivering commercial and residential developments. This chapter examines thirteen systems commonly used internationally against the key characteristics of green infrastructure including its form as a multifunctional network, relationship with the strategic objectives for the area and functions for improving health and well-being, climate change resilience and nature conservation. The findings suggest that the majority of systems do not provide a robust assessment of green infrastructure against these characteristics. Although they do recognise many of the functions that green infrastructure can provide, they miss opportunities for the additive benefits that can be provided through a multifunctional network. Many of the systems will accredit developments to some degree with very little or no consideration of green infrastructure, giving the impression that it is not an essential component of new development. Built environment assessment systems play an important role in setting the standard for the sector and, as such, could contribute to improving the quality of green infrastructure in the future.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ajuntament de Barcelona (2013) Barcelona green infrastructure and biodiversity plan 2020. Summary. Ajuntament de Barcelona, Spain
Albert C, von Haaren C (2014) Implications of applying the green infrastructure concept in landscape planning for ecosystem services in peri-urban areas: an expert survey and case study. Plan Pract Res. https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459.2014.973683
Ameen RFM, Mourshed M, Li M (2015) A critical review of environmental assessment tools for sustainable urban design. Environ Impact Assess Rev 55:110–125
BRE [Building Research Establishment] (2012) BREEAM Communities. Technical Manual. BRE. https://www.breeam.com/communitiesmanual/#resources/otherformats/output/10_pdf/20_a4_pdf_screen/sd202_breeam_communities_1.2_screen.pdf. Accessed 25 Apr 2018
BRE (2015) Home quality mark. Technical Manual. https://www.homequalitymark.com/filelibrary/HQM-Beta–England–2015_SD232_r1.0.pdf. Accessed 25 Apr 2018
BRE (2017) Evolving the ecological category in BREEAM communities. BRE. https://tools.breeam.com/filelibrary/Briefing%20Papers/SEF–new-factsheets-Aug-2017-/SEF-FactSheet—Communities-v.2.0.pdf. Accessed 25 Ap 2018
BRE (2018) BREEAM UK new construction. Non-domestic buildings (United Kingdom). Technical Manual. BRE. http://www.breeam.com/NC2018/content/resources/output/10_pdf/a4_pdf/print/nc_uk_a4_print_mono/nc_uk_a4_print_mono.pdf. Accessed 25 Apr 2018
Building for Life Partnership (2016) Building for life 12. 2016 edn. Nottingham Trent University: CADBE for the building for life partnership. http://www.udg.org.uk/publications/other-publication/building-life-12-2016-edition. Accessed 25 Apr 2018
Connop S, Vandergert P, Eisenberg B, Collier MJ, Nash C, Clough J, Newport D (2016) Renaturing cities using a regionally-focused biodiversity-led multifunctional benefits approach to urban green infrastructure. Environ Sci Policy 62:99–111
Davies C, Lafortezza R (2017) Urban green infrastructure in Europe: is greenspace planning and policy compliant? Land Use Policy 69:93–101
EC [European Commission] (2013) Green infrastructure (GI)—enhancing Europe’s natural capital. EC, Brussels, Belgium. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52013DC0249. Accessed 30 Apr 2018
Gavrilidis AA, Niță MR, Onose DA, Badiu DL, Năstase II (in press) Methodological framework for urban sprawl control through sustainable planning of urban green infrastructure. Ecol Indic. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.10.054
GBCA [Green Building Council of Australia] (2016) Green star communities scorecard v.1.1. https://new.gbca.org.au/green-star/rating-system/communities/. Accessed 25 Apr 2018
GORD [Gulf Organisation for Research and Development (2017) GSAS Technical Guide 2017. GORD. http://www.gord.qa/admin/Content/Link2120183544.pdf. Accessed 25 Apr 2018
Institute for Sustainable Infrastructure (2015) Envision rating system for sustainable infrastructure. https://research.gsd.harvard.edu/zofnass/files/2015/06/Envision-Manual_2015_red.pdf. Accessed 25 Apr 2018
Kambites C, Owen S (2006) Renewed prospects for green infrastructure planning in the UK. Plan Pract Res 21(4):483–496
Khoshkar S, Balfors B, Wärnbäck A (2018) Planning for green qualities in the densification of suburban Stockholm—opportunities and challenges. J Environ Plan Manage. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2017.1406342
Lennon M (2015) Green infrastructure and planning policy: a critical assessment. Local Environ 20(8):957–980
Meerow S, Newell JP (2017) Spatial planning for multifunctional green infrastructure: growing resilience in Detroit. Landsc Urban Plan 159:62–75
Metro Vancouver (2015) Connecting the dots: regional green infrastructure network resource guide. Metro Vancouver. http://www.metrovancouver.org/services/regional-planning/PlanningPublications/ConnectintheDots.pdf. Accessed 30 Apr 2018
Natural England (2009) Green infrastructure guidance. Natural England
Nowak DJ, Stein SM, Randler PB, Greenfield EJ, Comas SJ, Carr MA, Alig RJ (2010) Sustaining America’s urban trees and forests: a Forests on the edge report. In: General technical report NRS-62. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern Research Station, Newtown Square, PA, 27 p
O’Neil JA, Gallagher CE (2014) Determining what is important in terms of the quality of an urban green network: a study of urban planning in England and Scotland. Plan Pract Res 29(2):202–216
Pakzad P, Osmond P (2016) Developing a sustainability indicator set for measuring green infrastructure performance. Procedia—Social Behav Sci 216:68–79
Roe M, Mell I (2013) Negotiating value and priorities: evaluating the demands of green infrastructure development. J Environ Plan Manage 56(5):650–673
Sanström UG (2002) Green infrastructure planning in urban Sweden. Plan Pract Res 17(4):373–385
Sinnett D, Jerome G, Burgess S, Smith N, Mortlock R (2017) Building with nature—a new benchmark for green infrastructure. Town Ctry Plan 86(10):427–431
Sinnett D, Calvert T, Smith N, Burgess S, King L (2018) The translation and use of green infrastructure evidence. Proc ICE-Water Manag 171(2):99–109
Steiner F, Simmons M, Gallagher M, Ranganathan J, Robertson C (2013) The ecological imperative for environmental design and planning. Front Ecol Environ 11(7):355–361
Sustainable Sites Initiative (2014) SITES v2 rating system for sustainable land design and development. https://www.usgbc.org/resources/sites-rating-system-and-scorecard. Accessed 25 Apr 2018
USGBC [US Green Building Council] (2018a) LEED v4 for neighbourhood development. USGBC. https://www.usgbc.org/sites/default/files/LEED%20v4%20ND_01.5.18_current.pdf. Accessed 25 Apr 2018
USGBC (2018b) LEED v4 for homes design and construction. USGBC. https://www.usgbc.org/sites/default/files/LEED%20v4%20ballot%20version%20(Homes)%20-%2013%2011%2013.pdf. Accessed 25 Apr 2018
USGBC (2018c) LEED v4 for building design and construction. USGBC. http://greenguard.org/uploads/images/LEEDv4forBuildingDesignandConstructionBallotVersion.pdf. Accessed 25 Apr 2018
VGBC [Vietnam Green Building Council] (2015) LOTUS non-residential rating tool. Version 2.0. Technical manual. VGBC. http://vgbc.vn/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/LOTUS-Non-Residential-V2.0-Technical-Manual.pdf. Accessed 25 Apr 2018
VGBC (2017) LOTUS homes. Version 1.0. Technical manual. VGBC. http://vgbc.vn/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/LOTUS-Homes-V1-Technical-Manual.pdf. Accessed 25 Apr 2018
Acknowledgements
This work was funded through the Natural Environment Research Council Green Infrastructure Innovation Fund (grant NE/N016971/1).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sinnett, D., Calvert, T., Smith, N. (2019). Do Built Environment Assessment Systems Include High-Quality Green Infrastructure?. In: Lemes de Oliveira, F., Mell, I. (eds) Planning Cities with Nature. Cities and Nature. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01866-5_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01866-5_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-01865-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-01866-5
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)