Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Curriculum Studies in Mexico: Technical Rationality, Curriculum Communities, and Neoliberal Globalization

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Curriculum in International Contexts

Part of the book series: Curriculum Studies Worldwide ((CSWW))

Abstract

This chapter outlines the evolutionary trajectory of curriculum studies in Mexico. Kumar organizes this evolution into three phases. The first phase (the 1970s) was marked by the importation of the American technicist-behaviourist models of curriculum. Several works of American curriculum scholars were translated into Spanish and were drawn on to guide Mexican curricular policies and programs at the time. With the start of the second phase (the 1980s), this American model came under critique from Mexican curriculum scholars, who viewed it as being reductionist, rigid, and decontextualized. In subsequent years, these critical scholars converged into various intellectual communities (e.g., critical theorists, interpretivists, constructivists, and professional developmentalists) and pioneered research on Mexican curricular scholarship. The third (current) phase is characterized by a general orientation towards economistic visions of education with the introduction of globalized educational reforms marked by neoliberal notions of “innovation” and “accreditation” turning education into a vocational project evaluated through quantitative measures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alschuler, L. R. (1976). Satellization and stagnation in Latin America. International Studies Quarterly, 20(1), 39–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Althusser, L. (1971). Lenin and philosophy and other essays (B. Brewster, Trans.). London: New Left Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Apple, M. W. (2004). Ideology and curriculum (3rd ed.). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnaz, J. (1981). Curricular planning. Mexico City: Trillas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ausubel, D. P. (1963). The psychology of meaningful verbal learning. New York: Grune & Stratton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barco, S. (1975). Antitidáctica o nueva didáctica? Crisis de la didáctic. Aportes a la teoría y Práctica de la educación [Anti-didactic or new didactic? Didactic crisis. Contributions to the theory and practice of education]. Buenos Aires: Axis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrón, C. (2017). Chiaroscuros in curricular innovations: Between desire and reality. Transnational Curriculum Inquiry, 14(1–2), 47–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baudelot, C. (1988). La jeunesse n’est plus ce qu’elle était: Les difficultés d’une description. Revue Économique, 39(1), 189–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, B. (1973). On the classification and framing of educational knowledge. In R. Brown (Ed.), Knowledge, education and cultural change (pp. 363–392). London: Tavistock.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, B., Engelhart, M., Hill, W., Furst, E. J., & Krathwohl, D. R. (Eds.). (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: Cognitive domain. New York: David McKay.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bobbitt, J. F. (1918). The curriculum. New York: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borg, C., Cardona, M., & Caruana, S. (2013). Social class, language and power: ‘Letter to a Teacher’: Lorenzo Milani and the School of Barbiana. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1990). The logic of practice. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J. C. (1977). Reproduction in education, society and culture. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruner, J. S. (1966). On cognitive growth. In J. S. Bruner, R. R. Olver, & P. M. Greenfield (Eds.), Studies in cognitive growth. Oxford: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnoy, M. (1974). Education as cultural imperialism. New York: David McKay Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castoriadis, C. (1987). The imaginary institution of society. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charters, W. W. (1923). Curriculum construction. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coll, C. (1992). Psicología y curriculum [Psychology and curriculum]. Barcelona, Spain: Paidós.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commission of New Teaching Methods. (1976). Programmed teaching. Mexico City: CNME/UNAM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Covarrubias, P. (2009). Representaciones de académicos sobre la Psicología como profesión. Un estudio de caso. Journal of Behavior, Health & Social Issues, 1(1), 47–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Alba, A. (2011). Footprints and marks on the intellectual history of curriculum studies in Mexico: Looking toward the second decade of the twenty-first century. In W. F. Pinar (Ed.), Curriculum studies in Mexico: Intellectual histories, present circumstances (pp. 49–74). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Alba, A., Díaz-Barriga, Á., & Gaudiano, E. G. (1991). El campo del currículo: Anthology [The field of curriculum: Anthology] (Vol I & II). Mexico: UNAM, Centro de Estudios sobre la Universidad.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus (B. Massumi, Trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, J. (1976). Of grammatology. London & Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Díaz-Barriga, Á. (1984a). Didáctica y curriculum: Articulaciones en los programas de Estudios [Didactic and curriculum: Articulations in study programmes]. Mexico City: Nuevomar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Díaz-Barriga, Á. (1984b). Ensayos sobre la problemática curricular [Essays on curricular problems]. Mexico City: Trillas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Díaz-Barriga, Á. (1985). La Evolución del discurso curricular en México 1970–1982. Revista Latinoaméricana de Estudios Educativos, 15(2), 67–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Díaz-Barriga, Á. (1995). Investigation in the curricular field. In Á. Díaz-Barriga (Ed.), Curricular, institutional and organizational processes: Educative investigation of the eighties, perspectives for the nineties (pp. 1982–1992). Mexico City: COMIE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Díaz-Barriga, Á. (2003). Curricular investigation in México. The decade of the nineties. Number 5 of the collection educative investigation in Mexico 1992–2002. Mexico City: COMIE, the SEP and the CESU.

    Google Scholar 

  • Díaz-Barriga, Á. (2011). Curriculum studies in Mexico: Origin, evolution, and current tendencies. In W. F. Pinar (Ed.), Curriculum studies in Mexico: Intellectual histories, present circumstances (pp. 91–110). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Díaz-Barriga, Á., Díaz-Barriga, F., & Concepción B. (Eds.). (2008). Impacto de la evaluación en la educación superior Mexicana [Impact assessment in higher education in Mexico]. Mexico City: Iisue-Unam- Anuies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Díaz-Barriga, Á., & Pacheco, T. (Eds.). (1990). Five approximations to the study of professions (Cuadernos collection of the CESU No. 21). Mexico City: CESU/UNAM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Díaz-Barriga, F. (2011). Curriculum studies in Mexico: History and current circumstances. In W. F. Pinar (Ed.), Curriculum studies in Mexico: Intellectual histories, present circumstances (pp. 75–90). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Díaz-Barriga, F. (2014). Curriculum research in Mexico. In W. F. Pinar (Ed.), International handbook of curriculum research (pp. 329–339). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Díaz-Barriga, F., & Barrón, C. (2012). Innovation in education and curriculum reforms in Mexico. Transnational Curriculum Inquiry, 9(2), 67–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Díaz-Barriga, F., & Lugo, E. (2003). Curriculum development. In Á. Díaz-Barriga (Ed.), Curricular research in Mexico: The decade of the nineties (Educative research in Mexico collection, Vol. 5, pp. 63–123). Mexico City: Mexican Council of Educative Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Barbiana, S., & Milani, L. (1967). Lettera a una professoressa [Letters to a teacher]. Milan, Italy: Edizioni Mondadori.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, E. (1956). Education and sociology. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eggleston, J. (1977). The sociology of the school curriculum. London: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engels, F. (2001). The condition of the working class in England. London: Electric Book Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Establet, R. (1988). Subversion dans la reproduction scolaire. Revue Économique, 39(1), 71–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison (A. Sheridan, Trans.). New York: Pantheon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freire, P. (1973). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Seabury Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M., & Friedman, R. (1980). Free to choose: A personal statement. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. (1962). Civilization and its discontents. New York: W.W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furlán, A. (2011). Curriculum studies in Mexico: Key scholars. In W. F. Pinar (Ed.), Curriculum studies in Mexico: Intellectual histories, present circumstances (pp. 111–136). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furlán, A., & Rios, J. U. (2017). Theorizing the curriculum. Transnational Curriculum Inquiry, 14(1–2), 9–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadamer, H.-G. (1975). Truth and method. New York: Seabury Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadotti, M. (1996). Pedagogy of praxis: A dialectical philosophy of education. New York: Suny Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gagné, R. M. (1965). The conditions of learning. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gago, A. (1982). Development of descriptive letters. Mexico City: Trillas.

    Google Scholar 

  • García, F. (1978). Paquete de autoense ñ anza de evaluaci ó n del aprovechamiento escolar [Self-teaching package evaluation of learning achievement]. Mexico City: Centro de Investigaciones y Servicios Educativos, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garduño, J. M. G. (2011). Acculturation, hybridity, cosmopolitanism in Ibero-American curriculum studies. In W. F. Pinar (Ed.), Curriculum studies in Mexico: Intellectual histories, present circumstances (pp. 137–164). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giroux, H. (1989). Schooling, citizenship and struggle for democracy. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giroux, H., Penna, A., & Pinar, W. F. (1981). Curriculum and instruction: Alternatives in education. Berkeley: McCutchan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glazman-Nowalski, R. (2011). Revisiting curriculum studies. In W. F. Pinar (Ed.), Curriculum studies in Mexico: Intellectual histories, present circumstances (pp. 165–181). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glazman, R., & de Ibarrola, M. (1978). Design of study plans. Mexico City: Cise/Unam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glazman, R., & de Ibarrola, M. (1987). Design of study plans: Curricular model and reality. In Study plans. Institutional proposals and curricular reality (pp. 251–289). Mexico City: Nueva Imagen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gramsci, A. (1971). Selection from prison notebooks. New York: International Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1979). Communication and the evolution of society. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harazduk, I. (2014). Zapatistas and the Mexican educational system: A critical analysis of curriculum. Master’s thesis, American University, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegel, G. W. F. (1991). Elements of the philosophy of right. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M. (1962). Being and time. New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurt, S. (2016). Washington consensus. Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved from https://www.britannica.com/topic/Washington-consensus.

  • Husserl, E. (1964). The idea of phenomenology. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Illich, I. (1970). Deschooling society. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, P. (1968). Life in classrooms. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiménez, E. (2002). La participación de los académicos en el diseño curricular de planes y programas de estudio en la UNAM. Perfiles Educativos, 24(96), 73–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. (1965). American secondary schools. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I. (1990). The critique of pure reason. Raleigh, NC: Alex Catalogue.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacan, J. (1977/2004). The four fundamental concepts of psycho-analysis. London: Karnac.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laclau, E. (1996). Emancipation(s). London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lappasade, G., & Lourau, R. (1974). Claves de la sociología [Key concepts in sociology]. Barcelona: Laia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lechini, G. (2008). Globalization and the Washington consensus. Country: CLACSO. Retrieved from http://bibliotecavirtual.clacso.org.ar/ar/libros/sursur/lech/.

  • Lévi-Strauss, C. (1983). From honey to ashes. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lobrot, M. (1980). La pédagogie institutionnelle: L’école vers l’autogestion [Institutional pedagogy: School toward self-management]. Buenos Aires: Humanitas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyotard, J. F. (1988). Peregrinations: Law, form, event. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mager, R. F. (1968). Developing attitude toward learning. Palo Alto, CA: Fearon Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marin, D. E. (1993). Professional formation and university curriculum. Mexico City: Diana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K., & Engels, F. (1967). The communist manifesto. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mclaren, P. (1994). Life in schools: An introduction to critical pedagogy in the foundations of education (2nd ed.). New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nietzsche, F. W. (1994). On the genealogy of morality. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Null, J. W. (2010a). The curriculum. In C. A. Kridel (Ed.), Encyclopedia of curriculum studies (pp. 189–190). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Null, J. W. (2010b). Activity analysis. In C. A. Kridel (Ed.), Encyclopedia of curriculum studies (pp. 9–10). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’leary-Macais, G. (2013). Lighting my fire: Between two worlds: The passionate journey of a young American woman. Bloomington: Trafford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pacheco, D., Tullen, M., & Seijo, J. C. (Eds.). (2003). Aprender sirviendo. Un paradigma de formación integral comunitaria. México: Editorial Progreso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1967). Six psychological studies. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinar, W. F. (1978). Notes on the curriculum field 1978. Educational Researcher, 7(8), 5–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinar, W. F. (2010). Reconceptualization. In C. A. Kridel (Ed.), Encyclopedia of curriculum studies (pp. 735–736). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinar, W. F. (2011). Curriculum studies in Mexico: The exchanges, the concepts, the practices. In W. F. Pinar (Ed.), Curriculum studies in Mexico: Intellectual histories, present circumstances (pp. 207–249). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinar, W. F. (2012). What is curriculum theory? (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinar, W. F., Reynolds, W. M., Slattery, P., & Taubman, P. M. (1995). Understanding curriculum: An introduction to historical and contemporary curriculum discourses. New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popham, W. J., & Baker, E. L. (1970). Systematic instruction. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Posner, G. (1998). Análisis de currículo. Santafé de Bogotá: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poulantzas, N. A. (1975). Classes in contemporary capitalism. London: NLB.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quiroz, R. (2003). Telesecundaria: Los estudiantes y los sentidos que atribuyen a algunos elementos del modelo pedagógico. Revista Mexicana de Investigación Educativa, 8(17), 221–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rautenberg, E. (2009). El cambio curricular es más que sólo un armado técnico. In M. R. Plazola & E. Rautenberg (coords.), Sujetos y procesos del cambio curricular (pp. 17–41). México: Universidad Pedagógica Nacional.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reimer, E. (1971). School is dead: Alternatives in education. New York: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Remedi, E. (1992). Desórdenes, sentidos y signos de la gestión: Voces de los sujetos. Santiago de Chile: UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, S. (2018, January 21). Latin American dependency theory. Global south studies: A collective publication with the global south. Retrieved from https://globalsouthstudies.as.virginia.edu/key-thinkers/latin-american-dependency-theory.

  • Schon, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioners: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwab, J. (1969). College curriculum and student protest. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, D., Posner, C. M., Martin, C., & Guzman, E. (2018). The education system in Mexico (p. 180). London: University College London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silva, T. T. (1999). O currículo como fetiche. Belo Horizonte: Autêntica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stenhouse, L. (1975). An introduction to curriculum research and development. London: Butler and Turner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taba, H. (1962). Curriculum development: Theory and practice. New York: Harcourt Brace.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taubman, P. (2010). Audit culture. In C. A. Kridel (Ed.), Encyclopedia of curriculum studies (pp. 59–61). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tirado, M. C. B. (2011). Professional education in Mexico at the beginning of the twenty-first century. In W. F. Pinar (Ed.), Curriculum studies in Mexico: Intellectual histories, present circumstances (pp. 181–206). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trotsky, L. (1972). Leon Trotsky speaks. New York: Pathfinder Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, R. (1949). Basic principles of curriculum and instruction. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO. (1995). Document of politics for change and development in superior education. Paris: UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vela, J. A. (1972). Técnicas y prácticas de las relaciones humanas [Techniques and practices of human relations]. Bogotá: Indo-American Service Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher mental process. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Thought and language (Rev ed.). Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willis, P. E. (1981). Learning to labor: How working class kids get working class jobs. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, M. F. (1971). Knowledge and control: New directions for the sociology of education. London, UK: MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Žižek, S. (1994). Mapping ideology. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Mount Saint Vincent University, Halifax, NS, Canada

    Ashwani Kumar

Authors
  1. Ashwani Kumar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ashwani Kumar .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kumar, A. (2019). Curriculum Studies in Mexico: Technical Rationality, Curriculum Communities, and Neoliberal Globalization. In: Curriculum in International Contexts. Curriculum Studies Worldwide. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01983-9_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01983-9_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-01982-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-01983-9

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation