Skip to main content

Crowdfunding Practices for Social Projects: An Experiment of Co-Creation

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Finding New Ways to Engage and Satisfy Global Customers (AMSWMC 2018)

Abstract

The main objective of this study is to understand the impact of crowdfunding platforms used to gain support for social enterprises. Crowdfunding is an emergent and growing practice all over the world. The main use of crowdfunding nowadays is to support cultural and social projects, and this paper has a special interest in understanding the support that social enterprises receive from crowdfunding platforms, namely, through websites. There are several kinds of crowdfunding, but the donation-based orientation is the most popular model to support social projects and the focus of this study. A factorial experiment was conducted to test the traits’ behaviour. Our results show that the use of crowdfunding platforms leads supporters to build more favourable values of social enterprises when compared with nonsocial enterprises on crowdfunding platforms and social projects with traditional funding practices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Albinsson, P. A., Perera, B. Y., & Sautter, P. T. (2015). DART scale development: Diagnosing a firm’s readiness for strategic value Co-creation. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 24(1), 42–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avery, H. (2013). Crowdfunding gets stamp of approval. Euromoney, 43(527), 11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banhatti, R. D. (2016). Crowdfunding of a Social Enterprise: The GloW Project as a Case Study. In D. Bruntje & O. Gajda (Eds.), Crowdfunding in Europe: State of the art in theory and practice: 2016 (1st ed.) (pp. 223–239).

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrutia, J. M., & Echebarria, C. (2013). Networks: A social marketing tool. European Journal of Marketing, 47(1/2), 324–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrutia, J. M., Paredes, M. R., & Echebarria, C. (2016). Value co-creation in e-commerce contexts: Does product type matter? European Journal of Marketing, 50(3/4), 442–463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bellefamme, P., Lambert, T., & Schwienbacher, A. (2013). Individual Crowdfunding practices. Venture Capital. An International Journal of Entrepreneurial Finance, 15(4),313–333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernardes, B., & Lucian, R. (2015). Behavior of Brazilian and Portuguese consumers on crowdfunding platforms. Revista Portuguesa e Brasileira de Gestão, 14(1), 26–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dushnitsky, G., Guerini, M., Piva, E., & Rossi-Lamastra, C. (2016). Crowdfunding in Europe: Determinants of platform creation across countries. California Management Review, 58(2), 44–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. Directorate-General for Financial Stability FS and CMU Crowdsurfer Ltd, & Ernst & Young. (2015). Crowdfunding mapping EU markets and events study.

    Google Scholar 

  • Filieri, R. (2013). Consumer co-creation and new product development: A case study in the food industry. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 31(1), 40–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gierczak, M. M., Bretschneider, U., Haas, P., Blohm, I., & Leimeister, J. M. (2015). Crowdfunding: Outlining the new era of fundraising. In D. Bruntje & O. Gajda (Eds.), Crowdfunding in Europe: State of the art in theory and practice: 2016. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing AG.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grönroos, C., & Voima, P. (2012). Critical service logic: Making sense of value creation and co-creation. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 41(2), 133–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, T. P. (1977). On Goods and Services. Review of Income and Wealth, 23(4), 315–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holttinen, H. (2010). Social practices as units of value creation: Theoretical underpinnings and implications. International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences, 2(1), 95–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, M., Li, X., & Shi, M. (2015). Product and pricing decisions in Crowdfunding. Marketing Science, 34(3), 331–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirmani, A., Sood, S., & Bridges, S. (1999). The ownership effect in consumer responses to brand line stretches. Journal of Marketing, 63(1), 88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lefebvre, R. C. (2012). Transformative social marketing: Co-creating the social marketing discipline and brand. Journal of Social Marketing, 2(2), 118–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehner, O. M., & Nicholls, A. (2014). Social finance and crowdfunding for social enterprises: A public–private case study providing legitimacy and leverage. Venture Capital, 16(3), 271–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucian, R., & Bernardes, B. (2015). Who to fund? The crowdfunding phenomenon in Brazil. Revista Eletrônica de Jornalismo Científico, 174(1), 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKenny, A. F., Allison, T. H., Ketchen, D. J., Short, J. C., & Ireland, R. D. (2017). How should Crowdfunding research evolve? A survey of the entrepreneurship theory and practice editorial board. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41(2), 291–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mollick, E. (2014). The dynamics of crowdfunding: An exploratory study. Journal of business venturing, 29(1), 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palacios, M., Martinez-Corral, A., Nisar, A., & Grijalvo, M. (2016). Crowdsourcing and organizational forms: Emerging trends and research implications. Journal of Business Research, 69(5), 1834–1839.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prahalad, C. K., & Ramaswamy, V. (2004). Co-creating unique value with customers. Strategy & Leadership, 32(3), 4–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reis, R. P. (2017). Dar vida às ideias. Marketeer. pp. 64–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2001). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference (2nd ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Short, J. C., Ketchen Jr, D. J., McKenny, A. F., Allison, T. H., & Ireland, R. D. (2017). Research on crowdfunding: Reviewing the (very recent) past and celebrating the present. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41(2), 149–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valiati, V. A. D. (2013). Crowdfunding e indústria cultural: as novas relações de produção e consumo baseadas na cultura da participação e no financiamento coletivo. Verso e Reverso, 27(64), 43–49.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marta Bicho .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Academy of Marketing Science

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Lucian, R., Bicho, M. (2019). Crowdfunding Practices for Social Projects: An Experiment of Co-Creation. In: Rossi, P., Krey, N. (eds) Finding New Ways to Engage and Satisfy Global Customers. AMSWMC 2018. Developments in Marketing Science: Proceedings of the Academy of Marketing Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02568-7_152

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics