Skip to main content

The Colonial Round: The Opening Scene of Utilizing the Nile Waters Outside Egypt

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Nile Development Game
  • 698 Accesses

Abstract

The colonial round in the Nile game started with the longstanding configuration shaped by the natural and climatic characteristics (Appendix A) that made Egypt the only actual user of the Nile waters with no considerable competition. However, such a situation, which had persisted for many centuries, was changed gradually by the British occupation of Egypt in 1882. During the 1890s, France’s desire to threaten British interests in Egypt, though unsuccessful, led to the first real attempt to build a dam to alter the water flow to Egypt. Britain then sought to control the entire Nile Basin, either under its direct administration or through concluding agreements with other colonial powers and with Ethiopia. By the beginning of the twentieth century, Britain’s dominating position on the Nile led to the comprehensive development of cotton cultivation in its colonies across the basin. This was associated with the commencement of the first large irrigation scheme and regulator dams in Sudan, the attempt to build a storage reservoir at Lake Tana, and the generation of hydropower at the outlet of Lake Victoria in Uganda. As a result, the colonial round comprised different scenes of conflict and cooperation over the Nile waters, ranging from the exchange of threats to the conclusion of agreements.

No one can hold Egypt securely unless he holds also the whole valley of the Nile. The sources of the river in hostile, or even in indifferent, lands must always be a grave cause of danger, or, at the best, anxiety. … Everything depended on the Nile. The more Egypt was developed, the greater grew the need for the regulation of the water. The rulers of Egypt need have troubled little about the fate of countries divided from them by so many leagues of rainless desert, but for the link of the all-important river …

Sir Sidney Peel (1904: 112, 135)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The letter is recorded by the Portuguese missionary Father Jerome Lobo (1789: 184–185) during his “voyage to Abyssinia,” and available at: https://archive.org/details/avoyagetoabyssi00johngoog (accessed on August 16, 2016).

  2. 2.

    At the heart of the relations between Egyptian and Ethiopian rulers for centuries was the safety of the Christian minority in Egypt and the Muslim minority in Ethiopia.

  3. 3.

    Since Saint Athanasius of Alexandria consecrated Frumentius, the first Primate of Abyssinia, at the beginning of the fourth century, every Orthodox Primate of Abyssinia had been consecrated by the Coptic Patriarch of the Church of Alexandria (Hozier 1869: 4). Only in the 1950s, the Coptic and Abyssinian Churches were separated in light of severe hydropolitical as well as geopolitical disputes (Sect. 4.2.3).

  4. 4.

    Legendary chronicles tell, that “from this district [Abyssinia] the Queen of Sheba travelled to visit the capital of the Jewish Solomon, returning thence to the seat of her power at Axum, in Tigre, with the ark of the covenant and a Hebrew colony, and there raised a temple to the true God,” and that “the royal house of the country has directly descended from the Queen of the South, and the Negoos, or ruler of modern Ethiopia, claims descent from Menilek, an asserted child of Solomon by the Queen of Axum” (Hozier 1869: 3).

  5. 5.

    Available at: https://archive.org/details/britishandforei00offigoog (accessed on August 16, 2016).

  6. 6.

    Victor Prompt is a French hydrologist. He outlined his proposal in his lecture delivered before the Institute d’Egypte in Paris, 1893, under the title of “Soudan Nilotique” (Collins 1971: 83, 1990: 49–50; Wright 1972: 45; El-Atawy 1996: 16).

  7. 7.

    Available at: http://gis.nacse.org/tfdd/treaties.php?page=full&origin=river&tn=36 (accessed on August 16, 2016).

  8. 8.

    Available at: https://archive.org/details/bindingofnilenew00peel

  9. 9.

    Available at: https://archive.org/details/reportuponbasin00dupugoog (accessed on August 16, 2016).

  10. 10.

    The exact wording of Garstin is worth reading, which stated, “In all projects connected with Nile regulation, the interests of Egypt are so closely linked with those of the Sudan, as to be well-nigh inseparable. Both countries must derive their water supply from the same sources, and the agricultural prosperity of both is mainly dependent upon the one river. It is, therefore, impossible to consider any important irrigation scheme, projected for the one country, without touching upon its possible effects as regards the other” (Garstin 1904: 193).

  11. 11.

    Sir Murdoch McDonald was an adviser to the Egyptian Ministry of Public Works after the retirement of Sir William Garstin and up until 1921 (Kliot 1994: 35).

  12. 12.

    Available at: https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.79540 (accessed on August 16, 2016).

  13. 13.

    The 1929 Exchange of Notes between Britain and Egypt in regard to the use of the waters of the River Nile for irrigation purposes, in addition to the 1925 Nile Commission Report and the letters exchanged between Lord Allenby and Zewar Pasha, are available by the Transboundary Freshwater Dispute Database at: http://gis.nacse.org/tfdd/treaties.php?page=full&origin=river&tn=92 (accessed on August 24, 2016).

  14. 14.

    Available at: http://gis.nacse.org/tfdd/treaties.php?page=full&origin=river&tn=80 (accessed on August 24, 2016).

  15. 15.

    Available at: http://gis.nacse.org/tfdd/treaties.php?page=full&origin=river&tn=142 (accessed on August 24, 2016).

References

  • Abul-Magd, Z.A. Empire and its discontents: Modernity and subaltern revolt in Upper Egypt, 1700–1920. Ann Arbor MI, USA: Proquest, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • AUB. Middle East Forum (Volume 37). Beirut, Lebanon: The Alumni Association of the American University of Beirut, 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  • Awulachew, S.B., V. Smakhtin, D. Molden, and D. Peden. The Nile River Basin: Water, agriculture, governance and livelihoods. London, UK: Routledge, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blair, A. Britain and the World since 1945. London, UK: Routledge, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • British and Foreign State Papers. Correspondence Respecting Abyssinia (No. 212) in Volume LII (1861–1862). London, UK: The British Foreign Office, 1868.

    Google Scholar 

  • Budge, E.A.W. The Egyptian Sudan: Its history and monuments. New York NY, USA: Cosimo Classics, 1907/2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, R.O. European in Africa. New York NY, USA: Alfred A. Knopf, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, R.O. The waters of the Nile: Hydropolitics and the Jonglei Canal, 1900–1988. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Degefu, G.T. The Nile: Historical, legal and developmental perspectives – A warning for the 21st century. Bloomington: Trafford, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dilke, C.W. “Egypt – Now, and after?” In The Speaker: A review of politics, letters, science, and the arts (Volume IV, from July 4 to December 26, 1891), 730–733. London, UK: The Speaker, 1891.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dumont, H.J. “A description of the Nile Basin.” In The Nile: Origin, environments, limnology and human use, edited by H.J. Dumont, 1–21. New York NY, USA: Springer, 2009.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • El-Atawy, M.H. “Nilopolitics: A hydrological regime, 1870–1990.” Cairo Papers in Social Science, The American University in Cairo Press 19, no. 1 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fagan, B. The attacking ocean: The past, present, and future of the rising sea levels. New York NY, USA: Bloomsbury, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fueter, E. World history, 1815–1920. Edited by S.B. Fay. New York NY, USA: Harcurt, Brace, 1922.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garstin, W. Report upon the basin of the Upper Nile: With proposals for the improvement of that river. Cairo, Egypt: The Egyptian Ministry of Public Works – National Printing Department, 1904.

    Google Scholar 

  • Great Britain War Office. Record of the expedition to Abyssinia (Volume I), completed by order of of the Secretary of State for War by Major T.J. Holland and Captain H. Hozier. London: W. Clowes & Sons and Harrison & Sons, 1870.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howell, P.P., and J.A. Allan. The Nile, sharing a scarce resource: A historical and technical review of water management and of economic and legal issues. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1994.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Howell, P.P., M. Lock, and S. Cobb. The Jonglei Canal: Impact and opportunity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hozier, H. (1869). The British expedition to Abyssinia. London, UK: Macmillan and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurst, H.E., R.P. Black, and Y.M. Simaika. The Nile Basin: Future Conservation of the Nile (Volume VII). Cairo, Egypt: The Egyptian Ministry of Irrigation, 1946.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitissou, M., M. Ndulo, M. Nagel, and M. Grieco. The hydropolitics of Africa: A contemporary challenge. Newcastle, UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kliot, N. Water resources and conflict in the Middle East. New York NY, USA: Routledge, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Low, D.A., and A. Smith. History of East Africa (Volume 3). Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahajan, S. British Foreign Policy, 1874–1914: The role of India. London, UK: Routledge, 2003.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McCann, J. “Ethiopia, Britain and negotiations for the Lake Tana Dam, 1922–1935.” The International Journal of African Historical Studies 14, no. 4 (1981): 667–699.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McIntire, S. Speeches in world history. New York NY, USA: Files On File, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulira, J. “Independent Uganda and the Nile: Hydroelectric projects and plans.” In The River Nile in the post-colonial age: Conflict and cooperation among the Nile Basin countries, edited by T. Tvedt, 125–160. New York NY, USA: I.B. Tauris, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • NBI. “State of the River Nile Basin report.” Nile Basin Initiative. 2012a. http://nileis.nilebasin.org/content/state-river-nile-basin-report (accessed July 8, 2015).

  • Novokshshenov, V. “Laboratory studies of the stone masonry in the Old Aswan Dam.” Materials and Structures 26 (1993): 103–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peel, S.C. The binding of the Nile and the new Sudan. London, UK: E. Arnold, 1904.

    Google Scholar 

  • Said, R. The River Nile: Geology, hydrology and utilization. Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shukry, M.F. The Khedive Ismail and Slavery in the Sudan 1863–1879. Cairo, Egypt: Librairie La Resistance, 1938.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, W., and M. Jones. Europe 1783–1914. New York NY, USA: Routledge, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Starr, J.R., and D.C. Stoll. The politics of scarcity: Water in the Middle East. Boulder CO, USA: Westview Press, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Annual Register. The Annual Register: A review of public events at home and abroad for the year 1924. Edited by M. Epstein. Volume 166. London, UK: Longmans, Green and Co., 1925.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tignor, R.L. Egypt: A short history. Princeton NJ, USA: Princeton University Press, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tvedt, T. The River Nile in the age of the British: Political ecology and the quest for economic power. London, UK: I.B. Tauris, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of State. Papers relating to the foreign relations of the United States, 1928. Volume 2. Washington DC, USA: U.S. Department of State, 1943.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, W.E.F., and L.W. White. East Africa: A century of change 1870–1970. New York NY, USA: Africana Publishing Corporation, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waterbury, J. Hydropolitics of the Nile Valley. New York NY, USA: Syracuse University Press, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waterbury, J. The Nile Basin: National determinants of collective action. Ann Arbor, MI: Yale University, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willis, J., O. Egemi, and P. Winter. “Early states on the Nile.” In The Sudan handbook, edited by J. Ryle, J. Willis, S. Baldo and J.M. Jok, 10–22. Rochester NY, USA: James Currey, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woldetsadik, T.K. International watercourses law in the Nile River Basin: Three states at a crossroads. New York NY, USA: Routledge, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, P. Conflict on the Nile: The Fashoda incident of 1898. London, UK: Heinemann, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zunes, S., and S. Tucker. “Aswan High Dam.” In The encyclopedia of Middle East wars: The United States in the Persian Gulf, Afghanistan, and Iraq conflicts (Volume II), edited by S. Tucker, 166–168. Oxford, UK: ABC-CLIO, LLC, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Samaan, M.M. (2019). The Colonial Round: The Opening Scene of Utilizing the Nile Waters Outside Egypt. In: The Nile Development Game. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02665-3_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics