Skip to main content

Maps in Environmental Monitoring

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Environmental Geoinformatics

Part of the book series: Environmental Science and Engineering ((ENVSCIENCE))

  • 1200 Accesses

Abstract

A map is an abstraction of reality that creates a model of the world or a part thereof, effectively projecting the curved surface of the earth onto a plane surface. Unlike images that model reality at an iconic level of representation, maps accomplish the same at a symbolic level. Maps are important communication, navigation and decision support tools. They also serve as mechanisms for both storage and communication of spatial data and information.

The science of map making, known as cartography, is now intimately related to environmental monitoring because maps are generated from remote sensing, including aerial photography and satellites, as well as from field surveying and observations.

— D. M. Hendricks [1]

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Hendricks DM (2004) Maps in environmental monitoring. In: Artiola J, Pepper IL, Brusseau ML (eds) Environmental monitoring and characterization. Elsevier Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kraak M-J, Ormeling F (2003) Cartography: visualization of geospatial data. Pearson Education, London

    Google Scholar 

  3. Konecny G (2003) Geoinformation: remote sensing, photogrammetry, geographic information systems. Taylor and Francis, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. MacEachren AM, Kraak M-J (1997) Exploratory cartographic visualization: advancing the agenda. Comput Geosci 23(4) (Pergamon)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Mandelbrot B (1967) How long is the Coast of Britain? In: Statistical self-similarity and fractional dimension. Science. New Series, vol 156(3775), pp 636–638

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fisher P, Wood J, Cheng T (2004) Where is Helvellyn? Fuzziness of multi-scale landscape morphometry. Trans Inst Br Geogr 29:106–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Levin SA (1992) The problem of pattern and scale in ecology. Ecology 73

    Google Scholar 

  8. Tate N, Wood J (2001) Fractals and scale dependencies in topography. In: Tate N, Atkinson P (eds)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Jacobs PG (2005) Assessing RTK GPS for a suburban survey practice. University of Southern Queensland, Faculty of Engineering and Surveying. http://eprints.usq.edu.au/546/1/PeterJACOBS-2005.pdf. Accessed 28 Jan 2010

  10. US Army Corps of Engineers (2007) Control and Topographic Surveying. Engineering and Design Manual, EM 1110-1-1005

    Google Scholar 

  11. Garget D (2005) Testing of robotic total station for dynamic tracking. University of Southern Queensland. http://eprints.usq.edu.au/. Accessed 20 Aug 2009

  12. Kvamme K, Ernenwein E, Markussen C (2006) Robotic total station for microtopographic mapping: an example from the Northern Great Plains. Archaeol Prospect 13:91–102 (Wiley Interscience) www.interscience.wiley.com. Accessed 13 Aug 2009

  13. Gili JA, Corominas J, Rius J (2000) Using global positioning techniques in landslide monitoring. Eng Geol 155(3):167–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lavine A, Gardner J, Reneau S (2003) Total station geologic mapping: an innovative approach to annalyzing surface-faulting hazards. Eng Geol 70:71–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0013-7952(03)00083-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Reynolds W, Young F, Gibbings P (2005) A comparison of methods for mapping golf greens. Spat Sci Qld 27(4):33–36 (ISSN 1032-3848)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Braun M, Simões JC, Vogt S, Bremer UF, Blindow N, Pfender M, Saurer H, Aquino FE, Ferron FA (2001) An improved topographic database for King George Island: compilation, application, and outlook 13(1):41–52

    Google Scholar 

  17. Fischer C, Spreckels V (1999) Environmental monitoring of coal mining subsidences by airborne high resolution scanner. In: Geoscience and remote sensing symposium, 1999. IGARSS ’99 Proceedings. IEEE 1999 International, pp 897–899. https://doi.org/10.1109/IGARSS.1999.774478

  18. Ji CY, Liu Q, Sun D, Wang S, Lin P, Li X (2001) Monitoring urban expansion with remote sensing in China. Int J Remote Sens 22(8):1441–1455. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431160117207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Shalaby A, Tateishi R (2007) Remote sensing and GIS for mapping and monitoring land cover and land-use changes in the Northwestern coastal zone of Egypt. Appl Geogr 27:28–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2006.09.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Bakhsh A, Jaynes DB, Colvin TS, Kanwar RS (2000) Spatio-temporal analysis of yield variability for a cornsoybean field in Iowa. Trans ASAE 43(1):31–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Schmidt JP, Taylor RK, Gehl RJ (2003) Developing topographic maps using a sub-meter accuracy global positioning system. Appl Eng Agric 19(3):291–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Renschler CS, Flanagan DC, Engel BA, Kramer LA, Sudduth KA (2002) Site specific decision-making based on RTK GPS survey and six alternative data sources: watershed topography and delineation. Trans ASAE 45(6):1883–1895

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Fraisse CW, Sudduth KA, Kitchen NR (2001) Delineation of site-specific management zones by use of unsupervised classification of topographic attributes and soil electrical conductivity. Trans ASAE 44(1):155–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Tokmakidis K, Spatalas S, Pikridas C (2003) A comparison of a digital terrain model obtained from GPS and classical data. In: Proceedings of international symposium on modern technologies, education and professional practice in the globalizing world, November, Sofia, Bulgaria pp 30–35

    Google Scholar 

  25. Monico JFG (2004) United nations office for outer space affairs GNSS web pages. GPS Solut 8:112–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Clark RL, Lee R (1998) Development of topographic maps for precision farming with kinematic GPS. Trans ASAE 41(4):909–916

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Hall B (1994) Environmental mapping systems locationally linked databases. Riversinfo. Precision Info. http://www.precisioninfo.com/rivers_org/au/archive/?doc_id=1. Accessed 20 Aug 2009

  28. El-Mowafy A (2000) Performance analysis of the RTK technique in an urban environment. Aust Surv 45(1):47–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Featherstone WE, Stewart MP (2001) Combined analysis of real time kinematic GPS and its users for height determination. J Surv Eng 127(2):31–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Schloderer G, Bingham M, Awange JL, Fleming KM (2010) Application of GNSS-RTK derived topographical maps for rapid environmental monitoring: a case study of Jack Finney Lake (Perth, Australia). Environ Monit Assess 180(1–4):147–161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-010-1778-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joseph Awange .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Awange, J., Kiema, J. (2019). Maps in Environmental Monitoring. In: Environmental Geoinformatics. Environmental Science and Engineering(). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03017-9_22

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics