Skip to main content

Energy Transition, Anticipation and Change: A Study on the Anticipatory Experiences of the Low Carbon Society

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Anticipation, Agency and Complexity

Part of the book series: Anticipation Science ((ANTISC,volume 4))

  • 307 Accesses

Abstract

A paradigm shift towards the so-called low carbon society is one of the main challenges that our societies have to face in the near future. In the framework of the European Commission’s 7th Framework Program research project MILESECURE-2050, empirical research was carried out to understand the social dynamics that may characterize this change in the future. The research involved a Europe-wide study of the communities that “anticipate”, at local level, some basic features of a future low carbon society, i.e. Anticipatory Experiences. The research analysed over 90 Anticipatory Experiences in 19 European countries. Some of the experiences analysed attempted to change a single aspect of their communities, such as developing sustainable transport, energy-efficient housing or the generation of property-level renewable energy. Others wanted to produce a holistic sustainable community that incorporated a fully functional and independent low energy network. In summary, all the Anticipatory Experiences developed, or are actively developing, sustainable ways of producing, consuming and transporting energy. The Anticipatory Experiences were found to be operating at different local scales, ranging from neighbourhoods and towns to major cities. Their anticipatory character may be defined as the ability to take decisions and develop practical solutions today, in order to resolve issues that the society in general, and the local community in particular, will have to confront in the near future, first of all those involving climate change and the depletion of “carbon” energy resources. Taking as its starting point the empirical evidence of the research, the paper investigates how the anticipatory features of these communities resulted in structural changes in both the energy system and the local social system and in radical changes in individual behaviours.

The future is already here —

it’s just not very evenly distributed

William F. Gibson

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The various projects and other research initiatives funded by the EC include, among the others: PACT (Pathways for Carbon Transitions), PASHMINA (paradigm shifts modelling innovative approach), SPREAD (Sustainable lifestyles 2050), POLINARES (EU Policy on Natural Resources) and GILDED (Governance, Infrastructure, Lifestyle). Dynamics and Energy Demand: European Post-carbon Communities), AUGUR (Challenges for Europe in the world 2030), WEO (World Energy Outlook), WETO-T (World and European Energy and Environment Transition Outlook Report), MEDPRO (Mediterranean Prospects), MILESECURE-2050 (EU Low Carbon and Energy Security), POCACITO (Post-Carbon Cities of Tomorrow)

  2. 2.

    Multidimensional Impact of the Low-carbon European Strategy on Energy Security, and socio-economic dimension up to 2050 Perspective (MILESECURE-2050) was funded under FP7 programme and was carried out in the period 2013–2015.

  3. 3.

    For an overview of the studies on the complex relationship between science, technology and society, see d’Andrea and Declich 2014.

  4. 4.

    With regard to the concepts of “depth” and “intensity”, it is possible to refer to the literature of collective movements. See about: Benford and Snow 2000; Quaranta 1982; Jasper 2008.

  5. 5.

    Social sciences and especially sociology have a long tradition of research on sociocultural stress, dealt with under different conceptual labels such as anomie, cultural trauma, social crisis or social stress. Only making reference to general sociology, we can mention, e.g. Durkheim 2014; Merton 1938; Pearlin 1989; Beck 1992; Aneshensel 1992.

  6. 6.

    Anticipatory Experiences approach was adopted for the social study of materials. See Caiati and Declich 2016.

  7. 7.

    See in this regard the important activities carried out by UNESCO Chair in Anticipatory Systems, included the present volume.

References

  • Aneshensel, C.S. 1992. Social stress: Theory and research. Annual review of sociology 18 (1): 15–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benford, R.D., and D.A. Snow. 2000. Framing processes and social movements: An overview and assessment. Annual review of sociology 26 (1): 611–639.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, U. 1992. Risk society: Towards a new modernity. Vol. 17. Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns, T.R. 2012. The sustainability revolution: A societal paradigm shift. Sustainability 4 (6): 1118–1134 ISO 690.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caiati, G., L. d’Andrea, and M. Montefalcone. 2010. Societal Dynamic of Energy Transition. Pathways for carbon transitions Project PACT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caiati, G., G. Quinti, et al. 2014. Report on comparative analysis. MILESECURE-2050 Project.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caiati, G., Quinti, G., et al. 2013. Report on integrated analysis of local anticipatory experiences in energy transition in Europe. MILESECURE-2050 Project

    Google Scholar 

  • Caiati, G., and A. Declich. 2016. The social nature of materials. A brief overview and two case studies concerning the Energy transition context. Matériaux & Techniques 104 (6-7): 603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • d’Andrea, L., and A. Declich. 2014. Materials, Technology and Society: contributions from a sociological perspective. Matériaux & Techniques 102 (5): 507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, E. 2014. The division of labor in society. Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. 2013. A 2030 framework for climate and energy policies. Green Paper. In COM(2013) 169 final.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jasper, J.M. 2008. The art of moral protest: Culture, biography, and creativity in social movements. University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meadows, D.H., D.L. Meadows, J. Randers, and W.W. Behrens. 1972. The limits to growth. Vol. 102, 27. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R.K. 1938. Social structure and anomie. American sociological review 3 (5): 672–682.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nadin, M. 2010. Anticipation and dynamics: Rosen’s anticipation in the perspective of time. International Journal of General Systems 39 (1): 3–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2016. Anticipation across disciplines. In Springer International Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearlin, L.I. 1989. The sociological study of stress. Journal of health and social behavior: 241–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poli, R. 2017. Introduction to anticipation studies. Vol. 1. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2014. Anticipation: a new thread for the human and social sciences? Cadmus 2 (3): 23.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2010. The many aspects of anticipation. Foresight 12 (3): 7–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quaranta G. 1982. L’associazione invisibile: giovani cattolici tra secolarizzazione e risveglio religioso. Sansoni

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinti, G., G. Caiati, M. Gruenig, B. O’Donnel, O. Amerighi, B. Baldissara, and B. Felici. 2016. European Distributed Renewable Energy Case Studies. Low-carbon Energy Security from a European Perspective. Elsevier AP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohracher, H. 2008. Energy systems in transition: contributions from social sciences. International Journal of Environmental Technology and Management 9 (2-3): 144–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, R. 1985. Anticipatory Systems. Oxford: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1991. Life itself: a comprehensive inquiry into the nature, origin, and fabrication of life. Columbia University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Stirling, A. 2014. Transforming power: Social science and the politics of energy choices. Energy Research & Social Science 1: 83–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teilhard de Chardin, P. 1962. L’énergie humaine. Éditions du Seuil

    Google Scholar 

  • Tesla, N. 2008. The Problem of Increasing Human Energy: With Special Reference to the Harnessing of the Sun’s Energy. Cosimo, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watts, C. 2011. Human energy concepts in the social sciences and how to model them. Working paper submitted for the Satellite Workshop on “Social Energy”, European Conference on Complex Systems, 2011, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, S., Mandel, A., Chabay, I., Jaeger, C., & Kondor, I. 2010. Social energy: a useful concept for analyzing complex social systems?

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giovanni Caiati .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Caiati, G., Quinti, G., d’Andrea, L. (2019). Energy Transition, Anticipation and Change: A Study on the Anticipatory Experiences of the Low Carbon Society. In: Poli, R., Valerio, M. (eds) Anticipation, Agency and Complexity. Anticipation Science, vol 4. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03623-2_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics