Skip to main content

Food and Agriculture Global Value Chains: New Evidence from Sub-Saharan Africa

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Governance for Structural Transformation in Africa

Abstract

In the past twenty years, production has been increasingly unbundled and shared across many countries at different levels of development. The common perception is that Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) has neither been able so far to intercept the main changes in trade patterns nor enter massively into global production networks. This chapter uses the EORA Input-Output Tables and it applies to this data the gross exports decomposition method provided by Wang et al. (2013). The Global Value Chain (GVC) participation and position of SSA countries is then analysed with a focus on agricultural and food sectors. Results show a light and shadow picture. On the one hand, despite low trade shares at the global level, SSA agricultural sector turns out to be deeply involved in GVC participation and the relevance of its international linkages is increasing over time. On the other hand, SSA involvement in GVC is still limited to upstream production stages of the chain and mainly driven by the European market. This suggests a need for a new multi-stakeholder agenda to foster the capacity of SSA to take advantage of GVCs as drivers for their structural transformation, going beyond the simple narrative of upgrading.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The use of EORA database is the only option to look at the issue for a comprehensive set of countries in Sub-Saharan Africa so far. None of the other similar efforts, such as the Asian IO tables (IDE‑Jetro), the GTAP project, the OECD-WTO TiVA initiative and the WIOD project has the same extension in terms of country coverage and the same level of detail for end-use categories in Sub-Saharan Africa. Notwithstanding the growing use of the EORA database to carry out GVC studies (see, among others Caliendo et al. 2016; Del Prete et al. 2018), we made additional sensitivity analysis by comparing EORA and WIOD for overlapping sectors and countries. This highlighted consistent trends and a slight upward bias from WIOD (both at the country level and at the world level) likely due to the fact that the latter includes an artificial ‘Rest of the World’ country whose I–O matrix has been derived through a proportionality assumption based on an ‘average’ world technology. As pointed by the UNCTAD (2013) this assumption could yield a downward bias in the computed world FVA, as the world average I–O includes by definition large, relatively close, countries, while most excluded countries in the ‘Rest of the World’ aggregate tend to be small, relatively more open, economies.

  2. 2.

    See among others Hummels et al. (2001), Johnson and Noguera (2012), OECD (2012), Timmer et al. (2015), Los et al. (2016).

  3. 3.

    The DVX component includes also the returned value added (RDV), that is the portion of domestic value added that is initially exported but ultimately returned home by being embedded in the imports from other countries and consumed at home.

  4. 4.

    Note that the reported measures tend to be inflated by intermediate flows between countries of the same region. This inserts a bias in favor of the EU relative to other large single countries or smaller regional groups (e.g. NAFTA).

  5. 5.

    In some cases, such as for Uganda, Zambia and Niger, the EU absorbs almost 80% of the DVX despite the main destination for their gross exports is Africa.

  6. 6.

    It is called “Rotterdam effect” the fact that trade in goods with the Netherlands is artificially inflated by those goods dispatched from or arriving in Rotterdam despite the ultimate destination or country of origin being located elsewhere.

References

  • African Development Bank, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, United Nations Development Programme. (2015). African Economic Outlook: Regional Development and Spatial Inclusion. Tunis, Paris, and New York: African Development Bank, Organisation for Economic Co-operation, and Development, United Nations Development Programme.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balié, J., Del Prete, D., & Magrini, E., et al. (2018, forthcoming). Does Trade Policy Impact Food and Agriculture Global Value Chain Participation of Sub-Saharan African Countries? American Journal of Agricultural Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, C. B., Bachke, M. E., Bellemare, M. F., et al. (2012). Smallholder Participation in Contract Farming: Comparative Evidence from Five Countries. World Development, 40(4), 715–730.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, C. B., Christiaensen, L., Sheahan, M., & Shimeles, A. (2017, August 1). On the Structural Transformation of Rural Africa. Journal of African Economies, 26(suppl_1), i11–i35. https://doi.org/10.1093/jae/ejx009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caliendo, L., Feenstra, R. C., Romalis, J., & Taylor, A. M. (2016). Tariff Reductions, Entry, and Welfare: Theory and Evidence for the Last Two Decades. National Bureau of Economic Research. Available via https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/85e5/57675e3528bee32ca68d3a56e2610f7bca12.pdf. Acessed 1 June 2017.

  • Cattaneo, O., & Miroudot, S. (2015). From Global Value Chains to Global Development Chains: An Analysis of Recent Changes in Trade Patterns and Development Paradigms. In E. Zedillo & B. Hoekman (Eds.), 21st Century Trade Policy: Back to the Past? Volume in Honor of Professor Patrick Messerlin. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Del Prete, D., Giovannetti, G., & Marvasi, E. (2017). Global Value Chains Participation and Productivity Gains for North African Firms. Review of World Economics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10290-017-0292-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Del Prete, D., Giovannetti, G., & Marvasi, E. (2018). Global Value Chains: New Evidence for North Africa. International Economics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inteco.2017.03.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foster-McGregor, N., Kaulich, F., & Stehrer, R. (2015). Global Value Chains in Africa. United Nations University—Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (UNU-MERIT). Available via https://www.merit.unu.edu/publications/working-papers/abstract/?id=5759. Accessed 31 Mar 2016.

  • Greenville, J., Beaujeu, R., & Kawasaki, K. (2017). Estimating GVC Participation in the Agriculture and Food Sectors. OECD Trade and Agriculture Directorate. Available via http://www.oecd.org/officialdocuments/publicdisplaydocumentpdf/?cote=TAD/TC/CA/WP(2016)1/PART1/FINAL&docLanguage=En. Accessed 1 July 2017.

  • Hummels, D., Ishii, J., & Yi, K.-M. (2001). The Nature and Growth of Vertical Specialization in World Trade. Journal of International Economics, 54, 75–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International Monetary Fund. (2015). Regional Economic Outlook. Sub-Saharan Africa. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, R. C., & Noguera, G. (2012). Accounting for Intermediates: Production Sharing and Trade in Value Added. Journal of International Economics, 86(2), 224–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koopman, R., Wang, Z., & Wei, S. J. (2011). Give Credit Where Credit Is Due: Tracing Value Added in Global Production Chains. National Bureau of Economic Research. Available via http://www.nber.org/papers/w16426.pdf. Accessed 15 July 2015.

  • Koopman, R., Wang, Z., & Wei, S. J. (2014). Tracing Value-Added and Double Counting in Gross Exports. American Economic Review, 104(2), 459–494. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.104.2.459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuijpers, R., & Swinnen, J. (2016). Value Chains and Technology Transfer to Agriculture in Developing and Emerging Economies. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 98(5), 1403–1418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J., Gereffi, G., & Beauvais, J. (2010). Global Value Chains and Agrifood Standards: Challenges and Possibilities for Smallholders in Developing Countries. PNAS 2012, 109(31), 12326–12331.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenzen, M., Kanemoto, K., Moran, D., & Geschke, A. (2012). Mapping the Structure of the World Economy. Environmental Science and Technology, 46(15), 8374–8381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lenzen, M., Moran, D., Kanemoto, K., & Geschke, A. (2013). Building Eora: A Global Multi-regional Input-Output Database at High Country and Sector Resolution. Economic Systems Research, 25(1), 20–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Los, B., Timmer, M. P., & de Vries, G. J. (2016). Tracing Value-Added and Double Counting in Gross Exports: Comment. American Economic Review, 106(7), 1958–1966.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maertens, M., & Swinnen, J. (2015). Agricultural Trade and Development: A Value Chain Perspective (No. ERSD-2015-04). World Trade Organization. Available via https://www.wto.org/english/res_e/reser_e/ersd201504_e.pdf. Accessed 23 Mar 2017.

  • Minten, B., Randrianarison, L., & Swinnen, J. F. (2009). Global Retail Chains and Poor Farmers: Evidence from Madagascar. World Development, 37(11), 1728–1741.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montalbano, P., Nenci, S., & Pietrobelli, C. (2016). International Linkages, Value-Added Trade, and Firm Productivity in Latin America and the Caribbean. Firm Innovation and Productivity in Latin America and the Caribbean (pp. 285–316). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Montalbano, P., Nenci, S., & Pietrobelli, C. (2018). Opening and Linking Up: Firms, GVCs and Productivity in Latin America. Small Business Economics, 50(4), 917–935.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development, World Trade Organization (OECD). (2012). Trade in Value-Added: Concepts, Methodologies, and Challenges. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Available via https://www.oecd.org/sti/ind/49894138.pdf. Accessed 15 May 2015.

  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2016). Evolving Agricultural Policies and Markets: Implications for Multilateral Trade Reform. Paris: OECD Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahman, J., & Zhao, T. (2013). Export Performance in Europe: What Do We Know from Supply Links? International Monetary Fund. Available via https://www.imf.org/~/media/Websites/IMF/imported-full-text-pdf/external/pubs/ft/wp/2013/_wp1362.ashx. Accessed 18 Jan 2016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reardon, T., & Timmer, P. (2007). Transformation of Markets for Agricultural Output in Developing Countries Since 1950: How Has Thinking Changed? In R. E. Evenson, P. Pingali, & T. P. Schultz (Eds.), Handbook of Agricultural Economics (Vol. 3). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reardon, T., Barrett, C. B., Berdegué, J. A., & Swinnen, J. F. M. (2009). Agrifood Industry Transformation and Small Farmers in Developing Countries World Development, 37(11), 1717–1727.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swinnen, J. F. (2014). Global Agricultural Value Chains, Standards, and Development. http://cadmus.eui.eu/bitstream/handle/1814/31334/RSCAS_2014_30.pdf. Accessed 7 Feb 2017.

  • Timmer, M. P., Dietzenbacher, E., Los, B., et al. (2015). An Illustrated User Guide to the World Input-Output Database: The Case of Global Automotive Production. Review of International Economics, 23(3), 575–605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. (2013). World Investment Report 2013. Geneva: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Z., Wei, S.-J., & Zhu, K. (2013). Quantifying International Production Sharing at the Bilateral and Sector Levels. National Bureau of Economic Research. Available via http://www.nber.org/papers/w19677.pdf. Accessed 20 Jan 2015.

  • World Bank. (2012). Africa Can Help Feed Africa. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Davide Del Prete .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix

Appendix

Table 8.A1 SSA agriculture gross exports (%), by regions of destination (2013)
Table 8.A2 SSA agriculture indirect value added DVX (%), by regions of destination (2013) (Source Balié et al. 2018)
Table 8.A3 SSA foreign value added FVA (%), by regions of destination (2013) (Source Balié et al. 2018)
Table 8.A4 SSA food gross exports (%), by regions of destination (2013)
Table 8.A5 SSA food indirect value added DVX (%), by Regions of destination (2013) (Source Balié et al. 2018)
Table 8.A6 SSA food foreign value added FVA (%), by Regions of destination (2013) (Source Balié et al. 2018)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Balié, J., Del Prete, D., Magrini, E., Montalbano, P., Nenci, S. (2019). Food and Agriculture Global Value Chains: New Evidence from Sub-Saharan Africa. In: Elhiraika, A., Ibrahim, G., Davis, W. (eds) Governance for Structural Transformation in Africa. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03964-6_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03964-6_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-03963-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-03964-6

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics