Abstract
President Donald Trump has often drawn parallels between himself and Andrew Jackson. Both ran as populist outsiders to the political establishment who said they would represent forgotten Americans whose concerns had been ignored by a corrupt Washington elite. In this chapter we examine the Jacksonian tradition in America and explore whether Trump and Jackson enjoyed similar geographic bases of support. We find that they did. The relationship between county-level voting in 1828 and 2016 was stronger than in all but one election up until the Sixth Party System began in 1968. Knowing how a county voted in 1828 also better predicts how it voted in 2016 than does knowing how it voted in 1976. We illustrate the connection between voting in 1828 and 2016 by examining a consummate Jackson-Trump county (Pike County, Kentucky) and a prototypical Adams-Clinton county (Hampshire County, Massachusetts).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-statements/remarks-president-250th-anniversary-birth-president-andrew-jackson/, retrieved on December 23, 2017.
- 2.
https://www.cnn.com/election/2016/results/exit-polls, accessed March 15, 2018.
- 3.
https://visithampshirecounty.com/explore/culture/the-five-colleges, accessed on March 3, 2018.
- 4.
https://visithampshirecounty.com/, accessed on March 3, 2018.
- 5.
https://factfinder.census.gov/faces/tableservices/jsf/pages/productview.xhtml?src=CF, accessed on March 3, 2018.
References
Ban, C. (2014). County innovations and solutions. National Association of Counties. http://www.naco.org/articles/county-innovations-and-solutions-6. Retrieved on March 2, 2018.
Bilal, U., Knapp, E. A., & Cooper, R. S. (2018). Swing voting in the 2016 presidential election in counties where midlife mortality has been rising in white non-Hispanic americans. Social Science & Medicine, 197, 33–38.
Bor, J. (2017). Diverging life expectancies and voting patterns in the 2016 US presidential election. American Journal of Public Health, 107, 1560–1562.
Bracic, A., Israel-Trummel, M., & Shortle, A. (2018) Is sexism for white people? Gender stereotypes, race, and the 2016 presidential election. Political Behavior
Choma, B. L., & Hanoch, Y. (2017). Cognitive ability and authoritarianism: Understanding support for Trump and Clinton. Personality and Individual Differences, 106, 287–291.
Cowen, T. (2015). It’s not the inequality; it’s the immobility. New York Times Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/05/upshot/its-not-the-inequality-its-the-immobility.html. Accessed March 4, 2018.
Cox, D., Lienesch, R., & Jones, R. P. (2017). Beyond economics: Fears of cultural displacement pushed the white working class to Trump. https://www.prri.org/research/white-working-class-attitudes-economy-trade-immigration-election-donald-trump/. Accessed December 26, 2017.
Cramer, K. J. (2016). The politics of resentment: Rural consciousness in Wisconsin and the rise of Scott Walker. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Donovan, T., & Redlawsk, D. (2018). Donald Trump and right-wing populists in comparative perspective. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 28(2), 190–207.
Exit Polls. https://www.cnn.com/election/2016/results/exit-polls. Accessed March 15, 2018.
Federico, C. M., & Golec de Zavala, A. (2018). Collective narcissism and the 2016 US presidential vote. Public Opinion Quarterly, 82, 110–121. Available online first. Accessed February 25, 2018.
Guisinger, A. (2017). American opinion on trade: Preferences without politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Identity Politics. (2018). Dictionary.com Unabridged. Random House. http://www.dictionary.com/browse/identity-politics
Luttig, M. D., Federico, C. M., & Lavine, H. (2017). Supporters and opponents of Donald Trump respond differently to racial cues: An experimental analysis. Research and Politics, 4. October–December, 1–8.
Major, B., Blodorn, A., & Major Blascovich, G. (2016). The threat of increasing diversity: Why many white Americans support Trump in the 2016 presidential election. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 21, 1–10. Available online first. Accessed March 1, 2018.
Manza, J., & Crowley, N. (2017). Working class hero? Interrogating the social bases of the rise of Donald Trump. The Forum, 15(1), 3–28.
Mead, W. R. (1999/2000). The Jacksonian tradition and american foreign policy. The National Interest, 58: 5–29.
Mead, W. R. (2016). Andrew Jackson, revenant. The American Interest. Accessed on March 20, 2018.
Ratliff, K. A., Redford, L., Conway, J., & Smith, C. T. (2017). Engendering support: Hostile sexism predicts voting for Donald Trump over Hillary Clinton in the 2016 U.S. presidential election. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 1–16.
Remarks by the president on 250th anniversary of the birth of President Andrew Jackson. https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-statements/remarks-president-250th-anniversary-birth-president-andrew-jackson/. Retrieved on December 23, 2017.
Rothwell, J., & Diego-Rosell, P. (2016). Explaining nationalist political views: The case of Donald Trump. Manuscript.
Sides, J., Tesler M., & Vavreck, L. (2016). The electoral landscape of 2016. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 667, 50–71.
Sides, J., Tesler M., & Vavreck, L. (2018). Hunting where the duck are: Activating support for Donald Trump in the 2016 Republican primary. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 28(2), 135–156.
Tolbert, C. J., Redlawsk, D. P., & Gracey, K. J. (2018). Racial attitudes and emotional responses to the 2016 Republican candidates. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 28(2), 245–262.
Turney, S., Levy, F., Citrin, J., & O’Brian, N. (2017). Waiting for Trump: The move to the right of white working-class men 1968–2016. California Journal of Politics & Policy. Berkeley: Institute of Governmental Studies. Retrieved from https://escholarship.org/uc/item/1cq9k81z on March 15, 2018.
Wright, W. (2018). This Kentucky school district just voted to let teachers carry concealed guns. Lexington Herald-Leader. Available online at: http://www.kentucky.com/news/state/article202341909.html. Accessed March 3, 2018.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Darmofal, D., Strickler, R. (2019). Clinton vs. Trump: Back to the Future?. In: Demography, Politics, and Partisan Polarization in the United States, 1828–2016. Spatial Demography Book Series, vol 2. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04001-7_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04001-7_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-03999-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-04001-7
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)