Skip to main content

Introduction and Prior Research Review

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Interdisciplinary Design of Game-based Learning Platforms

Part of the book series: Advances in Game-Based Learning ((AGBL))

  • 1123 Accesses

Abstract

Games are not just a vehicle to enhance learning but a new way of understanding and organizing learning. The starting point of an optimal integration of learning and play in the game setting is to identify the salient elements of learning itself and the inherent learning processes in gameplay. In this introductory chapter, we discuss relevant theoretical perspectives on the nature of knowledge and learning that guide the exploration of playful elements in learning and consequently the opportunities for learning that games offer. We then provide a conceptual review of prior research of game design and discuss the challenges and the interdisciplinary nature of educational game development. In the end, we introduce the overall goal, structure, and chapters of this book.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abt, C. C. (1975). Serious games. New York: Viking Compass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adams, E. (2014). Fundamentals of game design. New York: Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adams, E., & Dormans, J. (2012). Game mechanics: Advanced game design. Berkeley, CA: New Riders.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amory, A. (2007). Game object model version II: A theoretical framework for educational game development. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55(1), 51–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, E., Liu, Y. E., Snider, R., Szeto, R., Cooper, S., & Popović, Z. (2011, June). On the harmfulness of secondary game objectives. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Foundations of Digital Games (pp. 30–37). New York: ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Annetta, L. A. (2010). The “I's” have it: A framework for serious educational game design. Review of General Psychology, 14(2), 105–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, K. (2008). The invention of good games: Understanding learning design in commercial video games (Doctoral dissertation, University of Calgary).

    Google Scholar 

  • Björk, S., & Holopainen, J. (2005). Patterns in game design. Boston, MA: Charles River Media.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breuer, J., & Bente, G. (2010). Why so serious? On the relation of serious games and learning. Journal for Computer Game Culture, 4(1), 7–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, E., Andersen, E., Smith, A. M., Gulwani, S., & Popović, Z. (2015, April). Automatic game progression design through analysis of solution features. In Proceedings of the 33rd annual ACM conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 2407–2416). New York: ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calvillo-Gámez, E. H., Cairns, P., & Cox, A. L. (2015). Assessing the core elements of the gaming experience. In Game user experience evaluation (pp. 37–62). New York: Springer, Cham.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Charsky, D. (2010). From edutainment to serious games: A change in the use of game characteristics. Games and culture, 5(2), 177–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1997). Finding flow: The psychology of engagement with everyday life. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Springer Science & Business Media.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • De Freitas, S., & Oliver, M. (2006). How can exploratory learning with games and simulations within the curriculum be most effectively evaluated? Computers & Education, 46(3), 249–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denis, G., & Jouvelot, P. (2005, June). Motivation-driven educational game design: Applying best practices to music education. In Proceedings of the 2005 ACM SIGCHI International Conference on Advances in computer entertainment technology (pp. 462–465). New York: ACM.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Deterding, S., Dixon, D., Khaled, R., & Nacke, L. (2011, September). From game design elements to gamefulness: Defining gamification. In Proceedings of the 15th international academic MindTrek conference: Envisioning future media environments (pp. 9–15). New York: ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1910). Science as subject-matter and as method. Science, 31, 121–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1929). The quest of certainty: A study of the relation of knowledge and action. New York: G.P. Putnam’s Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickey, M. D. (2007). Game design and learning: A conjectural analysis of how massively multiple online role-playing games (MMORPGs) foster intrinsic motivation. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55(3), 253–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eriksson, I., & Lindberg, V. (2016). Enriching ‘learning activity’ with ‘epistemic practices’–enhancing students’ epistemic agency and authority. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, 2016(1), 32432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gee, J. P. (2003). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. Computers in Entertainment (CIE), 1(1), 20–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hiebert, J., Carpenter, T. P., Fennema, E., Fuson, K., Human, P., Murray, H., et al. (1996). Problem solving as a basis for reform in curriculum and instruction: The case of mathematics. Educational Researcher, 25(4), 12–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunicke, R., LeBlanc, M., & Zubek, R. (2004, July). MDA: A formal approach to game design and game research. In Proceedings of the AAAI workshop on challenges in game AI (Vol. 4(1), p. 1722–1726).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, H. (2004). Game design as narrative architecture. In P. Harrington & N. Frup-Waldrop (Eds.), First person (pp. 44–53). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kafai, Y. B. (2012). Minds in play: Computer game design as a context for children’s learning. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ke, F. (2016). Designing and integrating purposeful learning in game play: A systematic review. Educational Technology, Research and Development, 64(2), 219–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiili, K. (2005). Digital game-based learning: Towards an experiential gaming model. The Internet and Higher Education, 8(1), 13–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, S., Song, K., Lockee, B., & Burton, J. (2018). Engagement and fun. In Gamification in Learning and Education (pp. 7–14). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Klopfer, E., Osterweil, S., & Salen, K. (2009). Moving learning games forward. Cambridge, MA: The Education Arcade.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koster, R. (2013). Theory of fun for game design. Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly Media.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malone, T. W., & Lepper, M. R. (1987). Making learning fun: A taxonomy of intrinsic motivations for learning. In R. E. Snow & M. J. Farr (Eds.), Aptitude, learning, and instruction volume 3: Conative and affective process analyses (pp. 223–253). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitgutsch, K. (2009). Passionate digital play-based Learning, (re)Learning in computer games like Shadow of the Colossus. Eludamos, 3(1), 9–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitgutsch, K., & Alvarado, N. (2012, May). Purposeful by design?: A serious game design assessment framework. In Proceedings of the International Conference on the foundations of digital games (pp. 121–128). New York: ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Rourke, E., Andersen, E., Gulwani, S., & Popović, Z. (2015, April). A framework for automatically generating interactive instructional scaffolding. In Proceedings of the 33rd annual ACM conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 1545–1554). New York: ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Rourke, E., Haimovitz, K., Ballweber, C., Dweck, C., & Popović, Z. (2014, April). Brain points: A growth mindset incentive structure boosts persistence in an educational game. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 3339–3348). New York: ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinelle, D., Wong, N., & Stach, T. (2008, April). Heuristic evaluation for games: Usability principles for video game design. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 1453–1462). New York: ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rieber, L. P. (1996). Seriously considering play: Designing interactive learning environments based on the blending of microworlds, simulations, and games. Educational Technology Research & Development, 44(2), 43–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, J., & Howells, C. (2008). Computer game design: Opportunities for successful learning. Computers & Education, 50(2), 559–578.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez, H. (2006). The playful and the serious: An approximation to Huizinga’s Homo Ludens. Game Studies, 6(1), 1604–7982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salen, K., Tekinbaş, K. S., & Zimmerman, E. (2004). Rules of play: Game design fundamentals. Boston: MIT press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salen, K., & Zimmerman, E. (2005). Game design and meaningful play. In J. Raessens & J. Goldstein (Eds.), Handbook of computer game studies (pp. 59–79). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sawyer, B. (2003) Serious games: Improving public policy through game-based learning and simulation. Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars. Retrieved from http://wwics.si.edu/foresight/index.htm.

  • Schell, J. (2014). The art of game design: A book of lenses. New York: AK Peters/CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shute, V. J., & Ke, F. (2012). Games, learning, and assessment. In D. Ifenthaler, D. Eseryel, & X. Ge (Eds.), Assessment in game-based learning: Foundations, innovations, and perspectives (pp. 43–58). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Suits, B. H. (1978). The grasshopper: Games, life and utopia. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Susi, T., Johannesson, M., & Backlund, P. (2007). Serious games: An overview. Retrieved from: https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:2416/FULLTEXT01.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Torbeyns, J., Lehtinen, E., & Elen, J. (2015). Describing and studying domain-specific serious games. Switzerland, Cham: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Van Staalduinen, J. P., & de Freitas, S. (2011). A game-based learning framework: Linking game design and learning. In M. S. Khine (Ed.), Learning to play: Exploring the future of education with video games (pp. 29–53). New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren, S. J., & Jones, G. (2017). Learning games: The science and art of development. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ke, F., Shute, V., Clark, K.M., Erlebacher, G. (2019). Introduction and Prior Research Review. In: Interdisciplinary Design of Game-based Learning Platforms. Advances in Game-Based Learning. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04339-1_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04339-1_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-04338-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-04339-1

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics