Skip to main content

Survey on Social Ego-Community Detection

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Complex Networks and Their Applications VII (COMPLEX NETWORKS 2018)

Part of the book series: Studies in Computational Intelligence ((SCI,volume 813))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Community detection is one of the main topics of social network analysis, which is attracting increasing attention from many researchers. In fact, the community detection can be done either from the global network (such is the case of global communities), or from some specific nodes: case of ego-communities. The early community detection works focused on network partitioning into several global communities. Over time, researchers have been interested in studying ego-communities to analyze the impact of interest nodes within network. Even if the global community survey is very well covered through works like that of Fortunato; that relating to ego-communities is not yet. The purpose of this paper is to propose a survey on ego-community detection approaches in order to reduce the survey lack while focusing on the strengths and weaknesses of existing solutions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The interest node is also called ego.

  2. 2.

    A graph is simple if it contains neither loops nor multiple edges.

  3. 3.

    These cliques are called \(\alpha \)-Optimal-Quasi-Cliques (\(\alpha \)-OQC).

  4. 4.

    An algorithm is said to be deterministic if it still detects the same communities by running it multiple times on the same dataset.

  5. 5.

    An algorithm is stable if it does not find strongly different communities on two topologically similar graphs.

References

  1. Bron, C., Kerbosch, J.: Algorithm 457: finding all cliques of an undirected graph. Commun. ACM 16(9), 575–577 (1973)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Clauset, A.: Finding local community structure in networks. Phys. Rev. E 72(2), 026,132 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Danisch, M.: Mesures de proximité appliquées à la détection de communautés dans les grands graphes de terrain. Ph.D. thesis, Paris 6 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Danisch, M., Guillaume, J.L., Le Grand, B.: Multi-ego-centered communities in practice. Soc. Netw. Anal. Min. 4(1), 1–10 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ding, X., Zhang, J., Yang, J.: A robust two-stage algorithm for local community detection. Knowl.-Based Syst. 152 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fagnan, J., Zaiane, O., Barbosa, D.: Using triads to identify local community structure in social networks. In: 2014 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM), pp. 108–112. IEEE (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Fanrong, M., Mu, Z., Yong, Z., Ranran, Z.: Local community detection in complex networks based on maximum cliques extension. Math. Probl. Eng. 2014 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Girvan, M., Newman, M.E.: Community structure in social and biological networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 99(12), 7821–7826 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Hamann, M., Röhrs, E., Wagner, D.: Local community detection based on small cliques. Algorithms 10(3), 90 (2017)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Huang, J., Sun, H., Liu, Y., Song, Q., Weninger, T.: Towards online multiresolution community detection in large-scale networks. PloS One 6(8), e23,829 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kaple, M., Kulkarni, K., Potika, K.: Viral marketing for smart cities: influencers in social network communities. In: 9th IEEE International Workshop on Big Data Appications in Smart City Development (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kloster, K., Gleich, D.F.: Heat kernel based community detection. In: Proceedings of the 20th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp. 1386–1395. ACM (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Liu, J., Wang, D., Zhao, W., Feng, S., Yifei, S.: A unified framework of lightweight local community detection for different node similarity measurement. In: Chinese National Conference on Social Media Processing, pp. 283–295. Springer (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lu, Z., Wen, Y., Cao, G.: Community detection in weighted networks: Algorithms and applications. In: 2013 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications (PerCom), pp. 179–184. IEEE (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Luo, F., Wang, J.Z., Promislow, E.: Exploring local community structures in large networks. Web Intell. Agent Syst. Int. J. 6(4), 387–400 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Moctar, A.O.M., Sarr, I.: Ego-centered community detection in directed and weighted networks. In: Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining 2017, ASONAM ’17, pp. 1201–1208. ACM, New York, NY, USA (2017). https://doi.org/10.1145/3110025.3121243

  17. Moctar, A.O.M., Sarr, I.: Building ego-community based on a non-closed neighborhood. In: 14th African Conference on Research in Computer Science and Applied Mathematics. Stellenbosch, South Africa (2018). To appear

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ngonmang, B., Tchuente, M., Viennet, E.: Local community identification in social networks. Parallel Process. Lett. 22(01), 1240,004 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ratnayake, R., Crowe, S.J., Jasperse, J., Privette, G., Stone, E., Miller, L., Hertz, D., Fu, C., Maenner, M.J., Jambai, A., et al.: Assessment of community event-based surveillance for ebola virus disease, sierra leone, 2015. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 22(8), 1431 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Tsourakakis, C., Bonchi, F., Gionis, A., Gullo, F., Tsiarli, M.: Denser than the densest subgraph: extracting optimal quasi-cliques with quality guarantees. In: Proceedings of the 19th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp. 104–112. ACM (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Wu, Y., Jin, R., Li, J., Zhang, X.: Robust local community detection: on free rider effect and its elimination. Proc. VLDB Endow. 8(7), 798–809 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Xiang, J., Hu, T., Zhang, Y., Hu, K., Li, J.M., Xu, X.K., Liu, C.C., Chen, S.: Local modularity for community detection in complex networks. Phys. A: Stat. Mech. Appl. 443, 451–459 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Zheng, W., Zhao, X., Kang, Z.: Analysis of associtivity and community structure in mobile social networks. Procedia Comput. Sci. 107, 630–635 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ahmed Ould Mohamed Moctar .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Ould Mohamed Moctar, A., Sarr, I. (2019). Survey on Social Ego-Community Detection. In: Aiello, L., Cherifi, C., Cherifi, H., Lambiotte, R., Lió, P., Rocha, L. (eds) Complex Networks and Their Applications VII. COMPLEX NETWORKS 2018. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol 813. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05414-4_31

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics