Skip to main content

How and Why Moral Hazard Has Distorted Financial Regulation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Failure of Financial Regulation

Part of the book series: International Political Economy Series ((IPES))

  • 777 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter argues that, since the 1980s, moral hazard has encouraged excessive indebtedness and contributed to greater leniency from regulators and financial gatekeepers towards systemic banks. Examining the rise of the “too big to fail” (TBTF) banking behemoths, we question how moral hazard came to dominate banking culture and how the developing financial innovation in and after the 1980s combined with that culture to accelerate the growth and pre-eminence of the mega-bank. We explore how financial gatekeepers—US regulators, credit rating agencies (CRAs), and the Federal Reserve—became “lenient partners” (or “sweeteners”) that enabled and accelerated the growth of the financial services sector. We propose various reforms dealing with TBTF banks, CRAs, US regulators, and the indebtedness of American citizens.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Disintermediation means bank customers directly engage in financial activities without the guidance and support of—and without paying fees to—intermediary financial institutions, such as banks and savings and loan associations.

  2. 2.

    Securitisation is the process of collecting and transforming individually illiquid assets into a pool of collateral supporting the issuance of senior and subordinated debt and equity interests. Common examples of securitisation include mortgage-backed securities (MBS), and asset-backed securities (ABS) secured by, for example, credit card account receivables.

  3. 3.

    Moral hazard occurs when one entity takes greater than proportionate risks because another entity bears or is made to bear the cost of those risks. In this chapter, moral hazard primarily refers to a specific situation, namely, that of US systemic banks, which take excessive risks because they are confident they will not be allowed to fail in case of severe financial distress. See Rowell and Connelly (2012) for a study of the term “moral hazard”.

  4. 4.

    Systemic risk is the possibility that an event at a bank or company level could trigger the collapse of the economy.

  5. 5.

    We focus exclusively on the US economic and financial system because consumer credit, structured finance products, excessive leverage, and the TBTF phenomenon emerged and developed dramatically in the US before spreading, to a lesser extent, to other developed countries.

  6. 6.

    Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC 1997, 248). The FDIC’s Annual Report for 1950 indicated that it was “the intent of the Corporation to use this authority sparingly”.

  7. 7.

    The consequence of hypergrowth strategies was the increasing concentration in the financial sector. This remains a major challenge of the re-globalization era. James Busumtwi-Sam provides a striking illustration in Chap. 5, showing that remittance flows are in the hands of a very small group of international money transfer operators.

  8. 8.

    See https://www.federalreservehistory.org/essays/failure_of_continental_illinois

  9. 9.

    The purchase of the ‘bad loans’ and the assumption of control represented a new response to a failing bank. Prior to the CINB crisis, the FDIC had three options: liquidate the bank and pay insured depositors (only), arrange for an acquiring bank to assume the liabilities (and thus protect uninsured depositors), or directly inject funds.

  10. 10.

    See https://www.federalreservehistory.org/essays/failure_of_continental_illinois and Carrington (1984).

  11. 11.

    See statement of Richard Michalek, US Senate, Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, Hearing on Wall Street and the Financial Crisis: The Role of Credit Rating Agencies , 23 April 2010, p. 44: Senator Levin: “OK. And then, what does [IBG-YBG] mean?” Richard Michalek: “IBG-YBG was explained to me to mean”, “I’ll be gone, you’ll be gone. So why are you making life difficult right now over this particular comment?” […] “When it was originally told to me, I did not realize how that thinking really was driving much of what was going on, actually”. Senator Levin: “Short-term thinking”. Mr. Michalek: “Short term, get this deal done, get this quarter closed, get this bonus booked, because I do not know whether or not my group is going to be here at the end of next quarter, so I have to think of this next bonus”.

  12. 12.

    For a scathing description of a battle for power exemplifying the then-current shift in cultures, see Auletta (1985).

  13. 13.

    It is worth noting that abundant liquidity on US capital markets was (and is still) partly driven by capital flows from China. See http://www.cnbc.com/2014/09/17/why-chinese-money-is-flooding-american-markets.html

  14. 14.

    Fee income of the largest US banks rose from 40% of total earnings in 1995 to 75% of total earnings in 2007 (Wilmarth 2009, 995). See also Greenwood and Scharfstein (2013, 5 et seq.).

  15. 15.

    The importance of a “third party risk assessor” grew in proportion with the development of securitisation. See below.

  16. 16.

    For a more exhaustive analysis of the role played by the main CRAs, namely, Fitch Ratings (Fitch), Moody’s Investors Service (Moody’s), and Standard & Poor’s (S&P), see below.

  17. 17.

    In July 2007, Chuck Prince (then CEO of Citigroup) said: “When the music stops, in terms of liquidity, things will be complicated. But as long as the music is playing, you’ve got to get up and dance. We’re still dancing”. See Nakamoto and Wighton (2007).

  18. 18.

    Here, our analysis is partly in line with Laurent Dobuzinskis’ chapter on regulatory failure.

  19. 19.

    Here, we briefly mention the FRB as regulator. Below, we will refer to it as monetary policy maker.

  20. 20.

    The “go along to get along” culture combines well with the “if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it” rubric in the developing “revolving door” environment, where mid-level regulators and “deal-level” employees at the CRAs were eager to maintain favour with potential future employers offering significantly greater financial rewards.

  21. 21.

    For a comprehensive overview of the byzantine US regulation and supervision of financial institutions, see Mason (2015).

  22. 22.

    Regulatory capture is an illustration of government failure that occurs when a regulatory body promotes the financial or political interests of the firms or groups it is charged with regulating. Nobel Prize winner George Stigler developed such arguments in various research works; for example, see Stigler (1964, 1971).

  23. 23.

    In the early 1990s, there was already a consensus that financial services spurred economic development. See King and Levine (1993).

  24. 24.

    SEC . 1992. Exclusion from the Definition of Investment Company for Structured Financings. Investment Company Act Release No. 19105. November 19 [57 FR 56248 (Nov. 27, 1992)].

  25. 25.

    Often used in determining regulatory capital and when posting collateral, such a deduction is referred to as a “haircut”.

  26. 26.

    In 1975, the SEC introduced the concept of NRSRO for the purpose of categorizing debt as investment grade (or not) when calculating broker-dealer capital.

  27. 27.

    SEC . 2001. Marketability of Asset-Backed Securities Issued by Special Purpose Vehicles. No-Action Letter. July 13.

  28. 28.

    Federal Register. Part II, Securities and Exchange Commission, 17 CFR Parts 210, 228, et al.—Asset-Backed Securities; Final Rule, Vol. 70 (5), January 7, 2005, Rules and Regulations, p. 1510.

  29. 29.

    For an overview of the Dodd-Frank Act and its capacity to prevent future financial crises, see Murdock (2011).

  30. 30.

    We have very reliable sources indicating that the SEC itself asked the Ford Motor Credit Company LLC to submit a request for a no-action letter on the day that Rule 436(g) was to have been suspended (i.e., the day after President Obama signed the Dodd-Frank Act). The rationale was that the Dodd-Frank provision was poorly thought out and would have caused enormous damage, so the SEC had to be proactive.

  31. 31.

    For additional post-crisis analysis of SFAS 140, see Barth and Landsman (2010).

  32. 32.

    Since 1991, federal banking regulators have been expected to take PCA to identify and address capital deficiencies at banks to minimize losses to the deposit insurance fund (DIF). PCA includes different types of penalties. A critically undercapitalized FDIC-regulated institution would be required to be taken into receivership by the FDIC.

  33. 33.

    As a refresher, when securities are traded through a recognized and sufficiently capitalized “exchange”, the counterparties are in fact each trading with the exchange, which then bears some of the risk of non-performance by the contracting parties. Exchange members typically pay fees and post margin (collateral) to the exchange to finance administration and to ensure sufficient capital is available to assume the relatively rare failures of the trading members.

  34. 34.

    Post-crisis, ISDA developed “Determination Committees” (“DCs”) to hear and determine transaction disputes from contracting counterparties. According to ISDA, the “DCs” consist of 15 member institutions, 10 of which are voting swap dealer members and 5 are voting non-dealer members. The majority of disputes involve whether or not a payment-triggering “credit event” has occurred under a credit default swap transaction. All participants using ISDA documentation contractually agree to adhere to the rulings of the DCs. But as with every other ISDA agreement, recourse for any member who disputes an outcome under the ISDA document is limited to judicial resolution in a court willing to take jurisdiction. ISDA itself has no power of enforcement. See ISDA (2012).

  35. 35.

    Credit ratings were first released by John Moody in 1909. The success of these credit risk indicators in the US enabled new entrants (Poor’s, Standard Statistics, and Fitch) to compete with Moody’s firm in the 1920s. Since Poor’s and Standard Statistics merged to form Standard & Poor’s (S&P) in 1941, the credit rating industry has been dominated by these three agencies. See Sinclair (2005) for an overview.

  36. 36.

    In 2013, in order to reduce the conflicts of interest inherent to the credit rating business, the European Commission “explored the appropriateness of, and ways to, support a European public credit rating agency”. However, this project has not materialized so far. See Regulation (EU) No. 462/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 May 2013 amending Regulation (EC) No. 1060/2009, para. 43.

  37. 37.

    The through-the-cycle methodology “places low weight on short-term credit shocks and thereby reduces rating volatility” (Moody’s 2003b).

  38. 38.

    Moody’s rated less than 5000 structured finance securities in 1994 vs. more than 86,000 in 2007 (Moody’s 2008, 2).

  39. 39.

    A rating affirmation letter is a letter that affirms the rating of the subject obligation as of such and such date is X. These letters may be requested in connection with a secondary market transaction or in connection with a change in control of a noteholder. A rating confirmation letter is akin to a “no-action” letter issued by a regulator and states that in light of some proposed action, such action “in and of itself” will not result in the reduction of the rating currently outstanding.

  40. 40.

    One possible answer: the CRAs are not selling their expertise, they are selling their ratings and buying market share from their competitors. See US Senate (2010).

  41. 41.

    https://www.federalreserve.gov/aboutthefed/mission.htm

  42. 42.

    Our critical view of the action performed by the Federal Reserve complements those developed by Laurent Dobuzinskis and Ted Cohn in this volume.

  43. 43.

    Alan Greenspan served as Chairman of the Federal Reserve from 1987 to 2006. He was succeeded by Ben Bernanke.

  44. 44.

    Core inflation is generally calculated using the consumer price index (CPI).

  45. 45.

    Even with respect to the core inflation standard, interest rates were too low. The federal funds rate minus inflation differential declined from 2.3 percentage points during 1986–1995 to 1.2 percentage points during 1996–2005 and 0.9 percentage point during 2006–2015.

  46. 46.

    Total assets of the Federal Reserve System soared from $900 billion in August 2008 (i.e., a few weeks prior to the collapse of Lehman Brothers) to $4.4 trillion in August 2014 (Federal Reserve data).

  47. 47.

    The FOMC (Federal Open Market Committee) is the branch of the Federal Reserve Board that determines the direction of monetary policy.

  48. 48.

    https://www.stlouisfed.org/from-the-president/video-appearances/2016/bullard-frankfurt-panel

  49. 49.

    This fear of jeopardizing one’s own short-term compensation (even when the action disproportionately threatens long-term returns) represents one critical facet of the culture steeped in moral hazard. The cognitive biases attending decisions involving immediate and future realized values, when combined with secondary incentives in the behaviour of sell-side analysts and traders operating in a “zero sum” trading environment, significantly contribute to less than economically optimal outcomes and amplify the swing of the regulate-deregulate pendulum.

  50. 50.

    A bail-in is an alternative to bailouts of failing banks where investors and in the extreme, depositors, take a loss rather than governments and taxpayers.

  51. 51.

    See https://www.warren.senate.gov/?p=press_release&id=1533

  52. 52.

    Pay As You Earn, or PAYE federal student loan repayment plans adjust the monthly amount due on the loan according to the income level of the borrower, adjusted for certain necessary expenditures. The term of the plan is typically 20 or 25 years, with the federal government paying to the private lender the unpaid interest and principal otherwise coming due on the loan. However, at the end of the 25 years, any remaining balance on the loan(s) is forgiven (but, subject to contrary subsequent legislation, the forgiven amount is recognized as taxable income to the borrower in the year of forgiveness). See Federal Register. 34 CFR Parts 685. 209 and 221.

  53. 53.

    IRR, or internal rate of return, is that implicit rate of return on investment from a stream of cashflows. The lender is effectively guaranteed a return of its capital at the 10-year treasury rate. The government’s cost of funds, assuming some payments are made by the student-borrower, is necessarily less than the 10-year treasury rate. The lender agreeing to forego the subsidy would effectively be sharing the risk of return on the student’s education.

References

  • Auletta, Ken. 1985. Power, Greed and Glory on Wall Street: The Fall of the Lehman Brothers. New York Times. February 17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bank for International Settlements (BIS). 2009. Stocktaking on the Use of Credit Ratings. Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, Joint Forum. June.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barth, Mary and Wayne Landsman. 2010. How Did Financial Reporting Contribute to the Financial Crisis? European Accounting Review. 19(3): 399–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Behr, Patrick, Darren J. Kisgen, and Jérôme P. Taillard. 2018. Did Government Regulations Lead to Inflated Credit Ratings? Management Science. 64(3): 1034–1054.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benmelech, Efraim and Nittai K. Bergman. 2012. Credit Traps, American Economic Review. 102(6): 3004–3032.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernanke, Ben S. and Frederic S. Mishkin. 1997. Inflation Targeting: A New Framework for Monetary Policy? Journal of Economic Perspectives. 11(2): 97–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernard, G. Wogan. 2009. Update on the Amendments to FAS 140 – Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets and Repurchase Financing Transactions, available at https://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/publications/rpte_ereport/2009/june/rp_g_wogan_bernard.authcheckdam.pdf

  • Bogle, John C. 2005. The Battle for the Soul of Capitalism. Yale: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bogle, John C. 2009. Enough: True Measures of Money, Business, and Life. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruce, R. Christian. 1998. Fed Approves Citicorp-Travelers Merger Creating World’s Largest Bank Company. BNA’s Banking Report. 71(449).

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrington, Tim. 1984. U.S. Won’t Let 11 Biggest Banks in Nation Fail. Wall Street Journal. September 20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cecchetti, Stephen G. and Enisse Kharroubi. 2015. Why Does Financial Sector Growth Crowd Out Real Economic Growth? BIS Working Paper No. 490.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cecchetti, Stephen G., Hans Genberg, John Lipsky, and Sushil Wadhwani. 2000. Asset Prices and Central Bank Policy. Geneva Reports on the World Economy 2. Center for Economic Policy Research, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cho, David. 2009. Banks ‘Too Big to Fail’ Have Grown Even Bigger. Washington Post. August 28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coffee Jr., John C. 2011. Ratings Reform: The Good, The Bad, and The Ugly, Harvard Business Law Review. 1(1): 795–847.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, Christopher. 2008. Chairman Cox Announces End of Consolidated Supervised Entities Program. September 26, available at https://www.sec.gov/news/press/2008/2008-230.htm

  • Department of the Treasury. 2008. The Department of the Treasury Blueprint for A Modernized Financial Regulatory Structure. Washington, D.C. March.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, William H. 2004. Speech by SEC Chairman: Opening Statement at April 28, 2004 Open Meeting. April 28, available at https://www.sec.gov/news/speech/spch042804whd.htm

  • Dowd, Kevin and Martin Hutchinson. 2010. Alchemists of Loss: How Modern Finance and Government Intervention Crashed the Financial System. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunsmuir, Lindsay and Ann Saphir. 2017. UPDATE 1 – Fed Chair Nominee Powell Sees No Too-Big-To-Fail Banks. Reuters. November 28, available at https://www.reuters.com/article/usa-fed-powell-banks/update-1-fed-chair-nominee-powell-sees-no-too-big-to-fail-banks-idUSL1N1NY1KY

  • Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC). 1997. History of the Eighties: Lessons for the Future, Washington, D.C.: FDIC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA). 2007. NASD and NYSE Member Regulation Combine to Form the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority – FINRA. News Release. July 30, available at http://www.finra.org/newsroom/2007/nasd-and-nyse-member-regulation-combine-form-financial-industry-regulatory-authority

  • Flores, Juan H. 2010. Competition in the Underwriting Markets of Sovereign Debt: The Baring Crisis Revisited. Law and Contemporary Problems. 73(4): 129–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaillard, Norbert J. 2011. A Century of Sovereign Ratings. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaillard, Norbert J. 2016. Coping with Reliance on Credit Ratings. Banking & Financial Services Policy Report. 35(7): 12–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaillard, Norbert J. 2017. Credible Sovereign Ratings: Beyond Statistics and Regulations. European Business Law Review. 28(1): 5–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaillard, Norbert J. and William J. Harrington. 2016. Efficient, Commonsense Actions to Foster Accurate Credit Ratings. Capital Markets Law Journal. 11(1): 38–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaillard, Norbert J. and Michael W. Waibel. 2018. The Icarus Syndrome: How Credit Rating Agencies Lost their Quasi-Immunity. Southern Methodist University Law Review. 71(4): 1077–1116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gay, Gerald D. and Joanne T. Medero. 1996. The Economics of Derivatives Documentation. Journal of Derivatives. 3(4): 78–89. Summer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, Robin and David Scharfstein. 2013. The Growth of Finance. Journal of Economic Perspectives. 27(2): 3–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hand, John R. M., Robert W. Holthausen, and Richard W. Leftwich. 1992. The Effect of Bond Rating Agency Announcements on Bond and Stock Prices. Journal of Finance. 47(2): 733–752.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harries, Brenton W. 1968. Standard & Poor’s Corporation New Policy on Rating Municipal Bonds. Financial Analysts Journal. 24(3): 68–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrington, William J. 2013. Letter to Mr. Abe Losice, Securities and Exchange Commission and Mr. Felix Flinterman, European Securities and Market Authority. September 11.

    Google Scholar 

  • He, Jie (Jack), Jun (QJ) Qian, and Philip E. Strahan. 2012 Are All Ratings Created Equal? The Impact of Issuer Size on The Pricing of Mortgage-Backed Securities. Journal of Finance. 67(6): 2097–2137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helleiner, Eric. 2014. The Status Quo Crisis: Global Financial Governance After the 2008 Financial Meltdown. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, Douglas R. 2014. Economy of Words: Communicative Imperatives in Central Banks. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horvitz, Paul M. 1975. Failures of Large Banks: Implications for Banking Supervision and Deposit Insurance. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis. 10(4): 589–601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Humphrey, Thomas M. 1975. The Classical Concept of the Lender of Last Resort. Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond Economic Review. 61: 2–9, January/February.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Monetary Fund (IMF). 2009. Global Financial Stability Report: Navigating the Financial Challenges Ahead. Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA). 2012. The ISDA Credit Derivatives Determinations Committees. May.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, John (Xuefeng), Mary Harris Stanford, and Yuan Xie. 2012. Does It Matter Who Pays for Bond Ratings? Historical Evidence. Journal of Financial Economics. 105(3): 607–621.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • JP Morgan. 1991. 1990 Annual Report.

    Google Scholar 

  • JP Morgan. 1992. 1991 Annual Report.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, Robert G. and Ross Levine. 1993. Finance and Growth: Schumpeter Might be Right. Quarterly Journal of Economics. 108(3): 717–737.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krippner, Greta R. 2007. The Making of US Monetary Policy: Central Bank Transparency and the Neoliberal Dilemma. Theory and Society. 36(6): 477–513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liscio, John. 1987. No Relationship: Top Bankers’ Pay Grows While Profits Lag. Barron’s National Business and Financial Weekly. June 29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, Joseph R. 2015. Overview and Structure of Financial Supervision and Regulation in the US. Policy Department A: Economic and Scientific Policy, Directorate General for Internal Policies. European Parliament. Brussels, available at http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2015/492470/IPOL_STU(2015)492470_EN.pdf

  • Mayer, Thomas. 1975. Should Large Banks Be Allowed to Fail? Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis. 10(4): 603–610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mendales, Richard E. 2009. Collateralized Explosive Devices: Why Securities Regulation Failed to Prevent the CDO Meltdown, and How to Fix It. University of Illinois Law Review. 2009(5): 1359–1415.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mezza, Alvaro and Kamila Sommer. 2015. A Trillion Dollar Question: What Predicts Student Loan Delinquency Risk? FEDS Notes. October 16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mian, Atif and Amir Sufi. 2014. House of Debt: How They (and You) Caused the Great Recession, and How We Can Prevent It from Happening Again. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Minsky, Hyman P. 1977. The Financial Instability Hypothesis: An Interpretation of Keynes and An Alternative to ‘Standard’ Theory. Nebraska Journal of Economics and Business. 16(1): 5–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moody’s Corporation. 2001. Annual Report 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moody’s Investors Service. 2003a. Structured Finance Rating Transitions: 1983–2002. January.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moody’s Investors Service. 2003b. Measuring the Performance of Corporate Bond Ratings. April.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moody’s Investors Service. 2007. Incorporation of Joint-Default Analysis into Moody’s Bank Rating Methodology. February.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moody’s Investors Service. 2008. Default & Loss Rates of Structured Finance Securities: 1993–2007. July.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgenson, Gretchen. 2009. The Cost of Saving These Whales. New York Times. October 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgenson, Gretchen and Joshua Rosner. 2011. Reckless Endangerment: How Outsized Ambition, Greed, and Corruption Led to Economic Armageddon. New York: Times Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murdock, Charles W. 2011. The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act: What Caused the Financial Crisis and Will Dodd-Frank Prevent Future Crises? Southern Methodist University Law Review. 64(4): 1243–1328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakamoto, Michiyo and David Wighton. 2007. Citigroup Chief Says Bullish on Buy-Outs. Financial Times. July 9.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neal, Michael K. 2000. Summary and Analysis of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act. Securities Regulation Law Journal. 28(2): 95–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oosterhuis, Paul W. 2005. Check-the-Box Planning in Cross-Border Transactions. Taxes – The Tax Magazine. March: 49–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Philippon, Thomas and Ariell Reshef. 2013. An International Look at the Growth of Modern Finance. Journal of Economic Perspectives. 27(2): 73–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poole, William. 2010. Ending Moral Hazard. Financial Analysts Journal. 66(3): 17–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowell, David and Luke B. Connelly. 2012. A History of the Term “Moral Hazard”. Journal of Risk and Insurance. 79(4): 1051–1075.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Securities and Exchange Commission. 2008. Summary Report of Issues Identified in the Commission Staff’s Examinations of Select Credit Rating Agencies. Washington, D.C. July 8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Securities and Exchange Commission. 2009. The SEC’s Role Regarding and Oversight of Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organizations (NRSROs). Report No. 458. Washington, D.C. August 27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Securities and Exchange Commission. 2013. Report to Congress – Credit Rating Agency Independence Study. Washington, D.C. November.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair, Timothy. 2005. The New Masters of Capital. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stigler, George J. 1964. Public Regulation of the Securities Markets. The Business Lawyer. 19(3): 721–753.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stigler, George J. 1971. The Theory of Economic Regulation. Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science. 2(1): 3–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, Joseph. 2010. Freefall: America, Free Markets, and the Sinking of the World Economy. New York and London: W. W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Summers, Larry. 2007. Beware Moral Hazard Fundamentalists. Financial Times. September 23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swary, Itzhak. 1986. Stock Market Reaction to Regulatory Action in the Continental Illinois Crisis. Journal of Business. 59(3): 451–473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tett, Gillian. 2009. Fool’s Gold: The Inside Story of J.P. Morgan and How Wall St. Greed Corrupted Its Bold Dream and Created a Financial Catastrophe. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Senate. 2009. Hearing Before the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs, Oversight on the Monetary Policy Report to Congress Pursuant to the Full Employment and Balanced Growth Act of 1978. Washington, D.C. February 24.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Senate, Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations. 2010. Exhibits – Hearing on Wall Street and the Financial Crisis: The Role of Credit Rating Agencies. Washington, D.C. April 23.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Senate, Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations. 2011. Wall Street and the Financial Crisis: Anatomy of a Financial Collapse. Washington, D.C. April 13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilmarth Jr., Arthur E. 2002. The Transformation of the U.S. Financial Services Industry, 1975–2000: Competition, Consolidation, and Increased Risks. University of Illinois Law Review. 2002(2): 215–476.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilmarth Jr., Arthur E. 2009. The Dark Side of Universal Banking: Financial Conglomerates and the Origins of the Subprime Financial Crisis. Connecticut Law Review. 41(4): 963–1050.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilmarth Jr., Arthur E. 2010. Reforming Financial Regulation to Address the Too-Big-to-Fail Problem. Brooklyn Journal of International Law. 35(3): 707–783.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yellen, Janet L. 2012. Revolution and Evolution in Central Bank Communications. Remarks by Janet L. Yellen, Vice Chair Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System at Haas School of Business, University of California, Berkeley, California. November 13.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Ted Cohn, Bill Harrington, and Anil Hira

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Norbert Gaillard .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Gaillard, N., Michalek, R.J. (2019). How and Why Moral Hazard Has Distorted Financial Regulation. In: Hira, A., Gaillard, N., Cohn, T. (eds) The Failure of Financial Regulation. International Political Economy Series. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05680-3_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics