Skip to main content

Power Consumption Model for Electrolytic Preparation of Copper Powders Using Response Surface Methodology

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Materials Processing Fundamentals 2019

Part of the book series: The Minerals, Metals & Materials Series ((MMMS))

  • 1415 Accesses

Abstract

Electrolytic production of copper powders is a process with a high power consumption . This study establishes a power consumption model for copper powder electrolysis using the response surface methodology (RSM) under laboratory conditions, which provides the basis for reducing power consumption . First, seven process parameters were screened out using the Plackett–Burman design (PBD) experiments. The results show that the factors that have a significant effect on the power consumption of copper powder electrolysis are electrolyte temperature, Cu2+ concentration, H2SO4 concentration, inter-electrode spacing, and current density. A quadratic mathematical model of significant factors and power consumption was then developed using the Box–Behnken design (BBD) of RSM. Finally, the model was used to optimize the most energy-efficient process conditions. In addition, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analysis indicates that the morphologies of electrolytic copper powders deposited under the optimized conditions generally have dendritic structure and the agglomerated copper particles are almost globular.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Jin S, Yang B (2004) Research on influence factors of preparing copper powders by electrolysis. China Powder Sci Technol 11(3):21–23

    Google Scholar 

  2. Orhan G, Gezgin GG (2012) Effect of electrolysis parameters on the morphologies of copper powder obtained at high current densities. J Serb Chem Soc 77(5):651–665

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Owais A (2009) Effect of electrolyte characteristics on electrowinning of copper powder. J Appl Electrochem 39(9):1587–1595

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Maksimović VM, LjJ Pavlović, Pavlović MG, Tomić MV (2009) Characterization of copper powder particles obtained by electrodeposition as function of different current densities. J Appl Electrochem 39(12):2545–2552

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Nikolić ND, LjJ Pavlović, Pavlović MG, Popov KI (2008) Morphologies of electrochemically formed copper powder particles and their dependence on the quantity of evolved hydrogen. Powder Technol 185(3):195–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. He W, Duan X, Zhu L (2009) Characterization of ultrafine copper powder prepared by novel electrodeposition method. J Cent South Univ Technol 16:708–712

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Xue J, Wu Q, Wang Z, Yi S (2006) Function of additives in electrolytic preparation of copper powder. Hydrometallurgy 82(3–4):154–156

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Wang M, Wang Z, Guo Z (2010) Preparation of electrolytic copper powders with high current efficiency enhanced by super gravity field and its mechanism. Trans Nonferrous Met Soc China 20(6):1154–1160

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Guo X, Chen S, Liang Y, Tian Q (2011) Effect of process conditions on the preparation of copper powders by electrodeposition. J Univ Sci Technol 33(2):182–187

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Akbarzadeh E, Shakib SE (2011) Comparison of effective parameters for copper powder production via electrorefining and electrowinning cells and improvement using DOE methods. Int J Miner Metall Mater 18(6):731–740

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Hao X, Yu X, Liu Z, Wang B (2006) The application of response surface methodology in optimization of microbial media. Food Res Dev 27(1):38–41

    Google Scholar 

  12. Myers RH, Montgomery DC, Anderson-Cook CM (2016) Response surface methodology. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  13. Montgomery DC (2012) Design and analysis of experiments. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  14. Shanavas S, Dhas JER (2017) Parametric optimization of friction stir welding parameters of marine grade aluminium alloy using response surface methodology. Trans Nonferrous Met Soc China 27(11):2334–2344

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Singh J, Chauhan A (2017) Influence of reinforcement parameters and ageing time on mechanical behavior of novel Al2024/SiC/Red mud composites using response surface methodology. JOM 69(12):2471–2479

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Xu T, Zhao L, Li S (2017) Gold self-leaching optimization of neutral roasted products of gold concentrate by response surface methodology. China J Nonferrous Met 27(3):629–636

    Google Scholar 

  17. Moghaddam MY, Shafaei SZ, Noaparast M, Ardejani FD, Abdollahi H, Ranjbar M, Schaffie M, Manafi Z (2015) Empirical model for bio-extraction of copper from low grade ore using response surface methodology. Trans Nonferrous Met Soc China 25(12):4126–4143

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Kul M, Oskay KO, Şimşir M, Sübütay H, Kirgezen H (2015) Optimization of selective leaching of Zn from electric arc furnace steelmaking dust using response surface methodology. Trans Nonferrous Met Soc China 25(8):2753–2762

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Yang K, Ye X, Su J, Su H, Long Y, Lü X, Wen Y (2013) Response surface optimization of process parameters for reduction roasting of low-grade pyrolusite by bagasse. Trans Nonferrous Met Soc China 23(2):548–555

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Azizi D, Shafaei SZ, Noaparast M, Abdollahi H (2012) Modeling and optimization of low-grade Mn bearing ore leaching using response surface methodology and central composite rotatable design. Trans Nonferrous Met Soc China 22(9):2295–2305

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Awe SA, Khoshkhoo M, Kruger P, Sandström Å (2012) Modelling and process optimisation of antimony removal from a complex copper concentrate. Trans Nonferrous Met Soc China 22(3):675–685

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Boz M, Hasheminiasari M (2013) The effect of process parameters on copper powder particle size and shape produced by electrolysis method. Steel Compos Struct 15(2):151–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China [grant number 51674057], the Chongqing Research Program of Basic Research and Frontier Technology [grant numbers cstc2016jcyjA0142, cstc2017jcyjAX0236], the Scientific and Technological Research Program of Chongqing Municipal Education Commission [grant numbers KJ1601326, KJ1713343], the Research Foundation of Chongqing University of Science & Technology [grant number CK2016B19] is gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bingzhi Ren .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Ethics declarations

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Wang, H., Xia, W., Ren, B. (2019). Power Consumption Model for Electrolytic Preparation of Copper Powders Using Response Surface Methodology. In: Lambotte, G., Lee, J., Allanore, A., Wagstaff, S. (eds) Materials Processing Fundamentals 2019. The Minerals, Metals & Materials Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05728-2_24

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics