Skip to main content

MARIO Project: Validation in the Hospital Setting

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Ambient Assisted Living (ForItAAL 2018)

Abstract

In the EU funded MARIO project, specific technological tools are adopted for the patient with dementia (PWD). In the final stage of the project, two trials were completed as shown below: first trial was performed in September 2017, and second trial was performed in October 2017. The implemented and assessed applications (apps) are My Music app, My News app, My Games app, My Calendar app, My Family and Friends app, and Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) app. The aim of the present study was to assess the acceptability and efficacy of MARIO companion robot on clinical, cognitive, neuropsychiatric, affective and social aspects, resilience capacity, quality of life in PWD, and burden level of the caregivers. Twenty patients (M = 8; F = 12) were screened for eligibility and all were included. In Pre- and Post-MARIO interaction, the following tests were administered: Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Clock Drawing Test (CDT), Frontal Assessment Battery (FAB), Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI), Cornell Scale for Depression in Dementia (CSDD), Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS), 14-item Resilience Scale (RS-14), Quality of Life in Alzheimer’s Disease (QOL-AD), Caregiver Burden Inventory (CBI), Tinetti Balance Assessment (TBA), and Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) was carried out. A questionnaire based on the Almere Acceptance model was used to evaluate the acceptance of the MARIO robot. In Post-MARIO interaction, significant improvements were ob-served in the following parameters: MMSE (p = 0.023), NPI (p < 0.0001), CSDD (p = 0.010), RS-14 (p < 0.0001), QoL-AD patients (p = 0.040), CBI (p = 0.040), SPMSQ (p = 0.040), and MNA (p = 0.010). The Almere Model Questionnaire presented a higher acceptance level in first and second trial.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. KOMPAÏ Robotics (2017) KOMPAÏ robots help frail people and caregivers. https://kompai.com. Accessed 23 May 2018

  2. Cooke M, Moyle W, Shum D, Harrison S, Murfield J (2010) A randomized controlled trial exploring the effect of music on quality of life and depression in older people with dementia. JHP 15:765–776

    Google Scholar 

  3. Lin Y, Chu H, Yang CY, Chen CH, Chen SG, Chang HJ et al (2011) Effectiveness of group music intervention against agitated behavior in elderly persons with dementia. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 26:670–678

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. D’Onofrio G, Sancarlo D, Seripa D, Ricciardi F, Giuliani F, Panza F et al (2016) Non-pharmacological approaches in the treatment of dementia. In: Moretti DV (ed) Update on dementia. InTech, Rijeka, Croatia, pp 477–491

    Google Scholar 

  5. Baer RH, Morrison HJ. Microcomputer controlled game. US patent 4207087, Issued 10 June 1980

    Google Scholar 

  6. Pilotto A, Ferrucci L, Franceschi M, D’Ambrosio LP, Scarcelli C, Cascavilla L et al (2008) Development and validation of a multidimensional prognostic index for 1-year mortality from the comprehensive geriatric assessment in hospitalized older patients. Rejuvenation Res 11:151–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Heerink M (2010) Accessing acceptance of assistive social robots by aging adults. In: Faculteit der Natuurwetenschappen, Universiteit van Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  8. Heerink M, Krose B, Evers V, Wielinga B (2010) Assessing acceptance of assistive social agent technology by older adults: the Almere Model. Int J Soc Robot 2(4):361–375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Tapus A, Tapus C, Mataric M (2009) The role of physical embodiment of a therapist robot for individuals with cognitive impairments. In: RO-MAN 2009—the 18th IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication, pp 103–107

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cohen-Mansfield J, Thein K, Dakheel-Ali M, Rigier N, Marx M (2010) The value of social attributes of stimuli for promoting engagement in persons with dementia. J Nerv Ment Dis 198(8):586–592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. McKhann GM, Knopman DS, Chertkow H, Hyman BT, Jack CR Jr, Kawas CH et al (2011) The diagnosis of dementia due to Alzheimer’s disease: recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer’s Association workgroups on diagnostic guide-lines for Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement 7:263–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. American Psychiatric Association (2013) Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 5th edn. Washington, American Psychiatric Association

    Google Scholar 

  13. Folstein M, Folstein S, McHugh PR (1975) Mini-mental state: a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 12:189–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Rouleau I, Salmon DP, Butters N et al (1992) Quantitative and qualitative analyses of clock drawings in Alzheimer’s and Huntington’s disease. Brain Cogn 18:70–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Dubois B, Litvan I (2000) The FAB: a frontal assessment battery at bedside. Neurology 55:1621–1626

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Cummings JL, Mega M, Gray K, Rosenberg-Thompson S, Carusi DA, Gornbein J (1994) The neuropsychiatric inventory: comprehensive assessment of psychopathology in dementia. Neurology 44:2308–2314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Alexopoulos GS, Abrams RC, Young RC, Shamoian CA (1988) Cornell scale for depression in dementia. Biol Psychiatry 23(3):271–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Zimet GD, Dahlem NW, Zimet SG, Farley GK (1988) The multidimensional scale of perceived social support. J Pers Assess 52:30–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Callegari C, Bertù L, Lucano M, Ielmini M, Braggio E, Vender S (2016) Reliability and validity of the Italian version of the 14-item Resilience Scale. Psychol Res Behav Manag 9:277–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Logsdon RG, Gibbons LE, McCurry SM, Teri L (2002) Assessing quality of life in older adults with cognitive impairment. Psychosom Med 64:510–519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Novak M, Guest C (1989) Application of a multidimensional caregiver burden inventory. Gerontologist 29:798–803

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Katz S, Downs TD, Cash HR, Grotz RC (1970) Progress in the development of an index of ADL. Gerontologist 10:20–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Lawton MP, Brody EM (1969) Assessment of older people: self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. Gerontologist 9:179–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Pfeiffer E (1975) A short portable mental status questionnaire for the assessment of organic brain deficit in elderly patients. J Am Geriatr Soc 23:433–441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Parmelee PA, Thuras PD, Katz IR, Lawton MP (1995) Validation of the cumulative illness rating scale in a geriatric residential population. J Am Geriatr Soc 43:130–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Vellas B, Guigoz Y, Garry PJ, Nourhashemi F, Bennahum D et al (1999) The Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA) and its use in grading the nutritional state of elderly patients. Nutrition 15:116–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Bliss MR, McLaren R, Exton-Smith AN (1966) Mattresses for preventing pressure sores in geriatric patients. Mon Bull Minist Health Public Health Lab Serv 25:238–268

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The research leading to the results described in this article has received funding from the European Union Horizons 2020—the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation (2014–2020) under grant agreement 643808 Project MARIO ‘Managing active and healthy aging with use of caring service robots’.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Grazia D’Onofrio .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

D’Onofrio, G. et al. (2019). MARIO Project: Validation in the Hospital Setting. In: Leone, A., Caroppo, A., Rescio, G., Diraco, G., Siciliano, P. (eds) Ambient Assisted Living. ForItAAL 2018. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, vol 544. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05921-7_41

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05921-7_41

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-05920-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-05921-7

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics