Abstract
In this chapter, we provide recommendations about ways to reform China’s IP regime to make it more conducive to innovation. While many reforms could be suggested, we highlight reforms we believe are most important to addressing the issues discussed in Chaps. 2–7. These recommendations can serve as the basis for further discussions between academics and policymakers and other actors actively involved in China’s NIS.
The original version of the book was revised: Author’s belated correction has been incorporated. The correction to the book is available at https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-10404-7_11
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Change history
29 June 2019
In the original version of the book, the following belated corrections are to be incorporated.
Notes
- 1.
In order to avoid patent trolling due in large part to the design of the US legal system, we do not suggest that China copy US IP Civil Procedure verbatim. However, we do believe that awarding higher IP damages and introducing a moderate discovery procedure enabling collection of evidence by IP rights holders will improve IP enforcement in China without strongly encouraging patent trolling.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Prud’homme, D., Zhang, T. (2019). Implications for Policymakers. In: China’s Intellectual Property Regime for Innovation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-10404-7_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-10404-7_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-10403-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-10404-7
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)